The new CBA

Griffin

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Posts
3,726
Reaction score
1
Location
EU
Here's a link to a summary of key provisions in the new CBA. This does not include any of the B-list issues still to be resolved.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/sam_amick/11/26/tentative.deal/index.html

I have tried to pick out the most important differences between the new and old CBA's and summarized them here:

  • 50%/50% (49-51 band) BRI split = around 12% overall decrease in player salaries
    - down from 57% in favor of players

    - minimum and rookie scale not affected right away
  • $5M annual mid-level exception only for non-taxpayers (4 year max contract length)
    - a bit lower than before, contracts shorter by one year, not available to tax-payers
  • $3M annual mid-level exception for taxpayers (4 year max contract length)
    - over $2M less than what tax-payers could use before
  • $2.5 annual mid-level exception for teams under the cap
    - not available before, allows teams to exceed cap even if they started off with cap room
  • $1.9 bi-annual exception for non-taxpayers only
    - previously was available to all teams
  • traded player exception increased to 150% of traded player salaries or $5M extra (whichever is less)
    - used to be 125%, taxpayers still restricted to 125%
  • minimum team salary: 85% in year 1 and 2, 90% thereafter
    - up from 75%
  • increased tax rate for taxpayers with incremental levels starting in year 3
    - used to be $1-for-$1
  • 50% of tax payments go to non-taxpayers
    - was 100%
  • maximum contract length for Bird players: 5 years
    - was 6 years

    [*]maximum contract length for non-Bird players: 4 years
    - was 5 years

    [*]maximum rookie extensions: 4 years, Designated Player rookie: 5 years
    - was 6 years
    - Designated Player is a new concept, each team can select only one
  • maximum non-rookie extensions: 4 years (3 years for extend-and-trades)
    - was 6 years for all
  • maxium annual raises: 7.5% for Bird/early-Bird, 4.5% for others
    - was 10.5%, 8% respectively
  • maximum salary: same as before except that 5th year players can receive 30% of cap if certain criteria met
    - 30% cap max not available in sign-and-trades (new restriction)
  • waived players' salaries can be stretched for duration of twice remaining contract years plus one
    - new rule, only applicable to new contracts, streched salaries also apply to salary cap
  • sign-and-trades prohibited if team salary post-trade would leave it $4M above LT (starting in year 3)
    - new restriction
  • sign-and-trades restricted to max 4-year contracts and 4.5% raises
    - previously sign-and-trades were treated like any other free agent signings
  • teams get 3 days to match offer sheets for RFA's
    - was 7 days
    - qualifying offers higher for players that meet certain criteria
  • lower cap holds for first-round picks and Bird players
  • extend-and-trades limited to 3-year extensions (2 new years if in last year of old contract) with 4.5% raises
    - no such restrictions before
    - players who sign extensions for more years/higher amount than above can't be traded for 6 months
    - players who were traded cannot sign extensions for more years/higher than above for six months
  • max $3M cash can be received in all trades per team annually
    - new restriction
  • traded players who are waived cannot re-sign with the team that traded them for 1 year
    - was 30 days
  • amnesty rule: each team can waive 1 current player prior to any season of the CBA
    - 100% of player's salary removed from salary cap although team still pays his salary
    - teams under the cap can submit competing bids to claim the player off waivers without assuming all of that player's salary
 

asudevil83

Registered User
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Posts
2,061
Reaction score
1
traded players who are waived cannot re-sign with the team that traded them for 1 year
- was 30 days

HUGE right there...i was waiting for this to happen
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
OK, does this deal

a. help the Suns
b. hurt the Suns
c. just put more money in $arvers pocket
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
OK, does this deal

a. help the Suns
b. hurt the Suns
c. just put more money in $arvers pocket

Remember that Sarver isn't about being frugal, he is about having to make stupid cost cutting moves because of previously stupid spending moves. This helps because it protects owners from some of the consequences of their own stupidity. Bad signings are not as destructive anymore. It also helps because teams over the LT will have huge limitations.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
A much more thorough comparison of the new and old CBA's from Larry Coon:

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/page/CBA-111128/how-new-nba-deal-compares-last-one

Wow. The waived player exception is a big one. It allows a team to stretch out the remaining pay of a waived player over twice the remaining years on the contract plus one.

Say you have a player owed $30 million over the next 3 years. You can waive him and reduce the annual cap hit from $10 million a year for 3 years to $4.3 million a year for 7 years. As long as a team does not overuse this option, it could a huge factor in signing free agents or getting under the LT.
 

Mr. Boldin

Mel Kiper's Daddy
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
1,634
Reaction score
284
The 30% of the cap extensions and only 1 5 year contract are really going to limit "super teams"
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Wow. The waived player exception is a big one. It allows a team to stretch out the remaining pay of a waived player over twice the remaining years on the contract plus one.

Say you have a player owed $30 million over the next 3 years. You can waive him and reduce the annual cap hit from $10 million a year for 3 years to $4.3 million a year for 7 years. As long as a team does not overuse this option, it could a huge factor in signing free agents or getting under the LT.

Yep waiving Childress and amnesty on Warrick is not that bad of an idea to be honest in 2012 if they can't trade one of them somehow.

Childress at that point has 3 years at 21M$ remaining on his contract. Waiving him would stretch that to 7 years at 21M$.

Effecitvely clearing $4M capspace in 2012,2013,2014 while taking up $3M in 2015,2016,2017, 2018

If the Suns did this and renounce the rights to Lopez, Pietrus, Nash in 2012 and not make any other roster changes this year that effect 2012 the roster would stand:

Gortat 7.2
Frye 6.0
Dudley 4.2
Morris 2.0
2012 1st round pick 2.0-4.0
2012 2nd round pick 1.0
caphold from waiving Childress 3.0

committed salaries ~23 projected cap at around 58 that makes 35.000.000 caproom.
 
Last edited:

asudevil83

Registered User
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Posts
2,061
Reaction score
1
Yep waiving Childress and amnesty on Warrick is not that bad of an idea to be honest in 2012 if they can't trade one of them somehow.

Childress at that point has 3 years at 21M$ remaining on his contract. Waiving him would stretch that to 7 years at 21M$.

Effecitvely clearing $4M capspace in 2012,2013,2014 while taking up $3M in 2015,2016,2017, 2018

If the Suns did this and renounce the rights to Lopez, Pietrus, Nash in 2012 and not make any other roster changes this year that effect 2012 the roster would stand:

Gortat 7.2
Frye 6.0
Dudley 4.2
Morris 2.0
2012 1st round pick 2.0-4.0
2012 2nd round pick 1.0
caphold from waiving Childress 3.0

committed salaries ~23 projected cap at around 58 that makes 35.000.000 caproom.

but to go after who? there isnt much star power unrestricted. Howard and Paul is pretty much it in the youth group.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
but to go after who? there isnt much star power unrestricted. Howard and Paul is pretty much it in the youth group.

yep. Clearing cap space has no value if you cannot sign players that are better than the ones you dumped to clear the space.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
There are some other FAs that are better than Childress and Warrick such as Anthony Randolph.
Not all teams will match a sizable offer for these restricted players outside of Rose, Westbrook and Love and such that are going to get the max from their teams.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
There are some other FAs that are better than Childress and Warrick such as Anthony Randolph.
Not all teams will match a sizable offer for these restricted players outside of Rose, Westbrook and Love and such that are going to get the max from their teams.

I just have no confidence that Sarver and crew will be able to draw top level talent or pay appropriately for the talent that they do draw.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,778
Posts
5,411,319
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top