Apr 7, 2005 #1 D Djaughe ___________________ Supporting Member Joined Dec 29, 2003 Posts 27,756 Reaction score 9 why B. Webb can't win 18 games minimum this season... *donsflameretardentsuit*
Apr 13, 2005 #2 OP OP D Djaughe ___________________ Supporting Member Joined Dec 29, 2003 Posts 27,756 Reaction score 9 2 - 0! Woohoo!
Apr 13, 2005 #3 thirty-two boglehead Supporting Member Joined Jun 5, 2003 Posts 26,992 Reaction score 3,990 Djaughe said: 2 - 0! Woohoo! Click to expand...
Apr 13, 2005 #4 OP OP D Djaughe ___________________ Supporting Member Joined Dec 29, 2003 Posts 27,756 Reaction score 9
Apr 13, 2005 #5 BC867 Long time Phoenician! Joined Sep 16, 2002 Posts 17,827 Reaction score 1,709 Location NE Phoenix Djaughe said: There's no reason why B. Webb can't win 18 games minimum this season. Click to expand... For that to happen, we're going to have to leave the Clayton/Counsell double-play combination in place most of the time. If an inferior fielding (but better hitting) SS bumps Royce, Webb will be afraid to the throw the ball in the strike zone, as he was last year. Luckily, Clayton had 3 hits last night and drove in the winning run, which makes the concept easier to take.
Djaughe said: There's no reason why B. Webb can't win 18 games minimum this season. Click to expand... For that to happen, we're going to have to leave the Clayton/Counsell double-play combination in place most of the time. If an inferior fielding (but better hitting) SS bumps Royce, Webb will be afraid to the throw the ball in the strike zone, as he was last year. Luckily, Clayton had 3 hits last night and drove in the winning run, which makes the concept easier to take.