This could be the worst cardinals hat i have ever seen

[AzWins23]

The title says it all

 

[SeattleCard]

nah... i've seen worse.

 

[WisconsinCard]

Its right up there....

 

[Scott MS]

It's bad (why blue?).

But I would rather wear that hat than this circus show.

You must be registered for see images

 

[RobbleRobble]

At first glance, it looks like the worst Giants hat I've ever seen.

 

[Cody]

At first glance, it looks like the worst Giants hat I've ever seen.

lol same here

 

[TruColor]

Thank goodness that Blue isn't a Cardinals' color anymore.

(now if we could just get rid of the Gray...)

 

[Cody]

You must be registered for see images

 

[arthurracoon]

You must be registered for see images

Isn't that a ProBowl jersey?

 

[Cody]

No....I used to see them for plummer and fitz

 

[TruColor]

You must be registered for see images

Fashion jersey...never intended to be worn on the field...

 

[Cody]

Fashion jersey...never intended to be worn on the field...

ya i know.....but who would waste $70 dollars on that

 

[Ryanwb]

Fashion jersey...never intended to be worn on the field...

Sort of like Chris Griesen jerseys?

 

[Scott MS]

You must be registered for see images

Here's a hot one -- blue and a player no longer with the team.

 

[bratwurst]

They'll never top the zubas stuff. (or whatever they called that striped crap)

 

[RugbyMuffin]

I like the blue.......but aren't we Red, and Black.

Peace

 

[CardsRep03]

It's bad (why blue?).

But I would rather wear that hat than this circus show.

You must be registered for see images

When I first saw this hat I thought that the designers had a difficult chore to put the logo on such a small unusual shaped area and to have to put one logo on two different planes of the hat. After seeing the Cardinals' hat first, and being horrified at the buctchering, I figured some of the other hats have to be horrendous.( I like the new Cardinals logo so I figured some of the other ones have to be mutated horribly.) I was shocked and angered; they were really good, surprisingly. They were able to do the logos and represent them very well on the two planes of the hats. For some reason, they butchered the Cardinals' new logo. They acutally altered how the logo looks. The eye looks wrong. And the beak looks wrong--hence the daffy duck comment from one of you. The white border that outlines the logo is two different thicknesses! Last time I checked the border doesn't fluctuate thicknesses.

I was particularly interested in seeing how they did on the bird logos of other teams. Maybe birds are hard to duplicate. Apparently so, because I didn't care much for what they did to the Seahawks hat. It's not horrible but it's the second worst. I did like the Ravens bird, though, and thought they did a good job of getting it on the hat and having it not only look like the original, but acutally look great say, compared to the Cardinal logo.

Fear not fellow Cards fans, I've come up with a solution. The designers should be locked in a room with three mean, hungry pit bulls on a chain and kept within ten feet of the designers.(We'll nickname them "Meat") Outside the room would be a team of 6 Cardinal fans from this board having been forced to each buy one of these hats at full retail price and been forced to wear in public for a week--in Phoenix. Three of the Cardinal fans would be holding the chained pit bulls, the other three would be the redesign judges. These judges would be given a strict diet of gun powder and vinegar. The designers would be given 3 chances of redesigning the hat logo. Each redesign that fails to please the judges would require the holders of the pit bulls to slacken the chain three feet. If the first release of the chain didn't happen to catch the attention of the designers I can almost guarantee the second one would! To steal a baseball quote, "three strikes and the designers would be out". Wherin now, they'd be called, "Lunch".

 

[Cody]

I liek the hat. Are they fitted?

You must be registered for see images

 

[Scott MS]

There are some decent hats now at Sports Authority, including the 2 below. You don't have to settle for the sideline hat. Both the ones below were nice.

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

 

[phillycard]

When I first saw this hat I thought that the designers had a difficult chore to put the logo on such a small unusual shaped area and to have to put one logo on two different planes of the hat. After seeing the Cardinals' hat first, and being horrified at the buctchering, I figured some of the other hats have to be horrendous.( I like the new Cardinals logo so I figured some of the other ones have to be mutated horribly.) I was shocked and angered; they were really good, surprisingly. They were able to do the logos and represent them very well on the two planes of the hats. For some reason, they butchered the Cardinals' new logo. They acutally altered how the logo looks. The eye looks wrong. And the beak looks wrong--hence the daffy duck comment from one of you. The white border that outlines the logo is two different thicknesses! Last time I checked the border doesn't fluctuate thicknesses.

I was particularly interested in seeing how they did on the bird logos of other teams. Maybe birds are hard to duplicate. Apparently so, because I didn't care much for what they did to the Seahawks hat. It's not horrible but it's the second worst. I did like the Ravens bird, though, and thought they did a good job of getting it on the hat and having it not only look like the original, but acutally look great say, compared to the Cardinal logo.

Fear not fellow Cards fans, I've come up with a solution. The designers should be locked in a room with three mean, hungry pit bulls on a chain and kept within ten feet of the designers.(We'll nickname them "Meat") Outside the room would be a team of 6 Cardinal fans from this board having been forced to each buy one of these hats at full retail price and been forced to wear in public for a week--in Phoenix. Three of the Cardinal fans would be holding the chained pit bulls, the other three would be the redesign judges. These judges would be given a strict diet of gun powder and vinegar. The designers would be given 3 chances of redesigning the hat logo. Each redesign that fails to please the judges would require the holders of the pit bulls to slacken the chain three feet. If the first release of the chain didn't happen to catch the attention of the designers I can almost guarantee the second one would! To steal a baseball quote, "three strikes and the designers would be out". Wherin now, they'd be called, "Lunch".

 

[100%CardsFan]

The blue is not a "Fashion Jersey" it is an alt jersey and the Cards do have the option to wear it if they like. just like the Bears bright orange jersey. BTW was the first blue hat a flexfit or is a velcro? I only wear flexfits now.

 

[TruColor]

The blue is not a "Fashion Jersey" it is an alt jersey and the Cards do have the option to wear it if they like. just like the Bears bright orange jersey. BTW was the first blue hat a flexfit or is a velcro? I only wear flexfits now.

No, it is a fashion jersey. And, the Orange Bears jersey (I think) you're referring to is also a fashion jersey. However, the Bears are supposed to be unveiling an alternate Orange jersey this coming season or the next.

I know that one of the NFL video games had a bunch of these fashion jerseys as alternates, but they're not legitimate alts.

I've got all of the NFL Style Guide graphics from the last few seasons - they've got all of the official alternate artwork in them as well - and there is NO Blue Cardinals alt.

 

[bratwurst]

The worst alt going is the red giants jersey. They all look like quarterbacks in training camp running around on the field. ridiculousness.

 

[TruColor]

The worst alt going is the red giants jersey. They all look like quarterbacks in training camp running around on the field. ridiculousness.

Uh...how are they any worse than the now-old Cardinals' Red jerseys?

(but I agree - those Giants alts suck!)

 

[bratwurst]

because the Cardinals basically had red and white uniforms. The Giants normally wear blue and grey, and with the blue helmets and grey pants with the stripe, the red looked out of place. I don't think they flow. If someone had never watched the Giants before, then maybe it would look normal to them. But I think the red jerseys look out of place in conjunction with the rest of their uniform, like a practice red "don't hit me" uni.