was it a fumble ?

Fiasco

Tyler Durden
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Posts
2,122
Reaction score
879
Location
St. Louis, MO
If your talking about Looker's catch before the field goal attempt, no it wasn't a fumble.
 

az1965

Love Games!
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
14,760
Reaction score
0
Location
Austin, TX
Originally posted by Fiasco
If your talking about Looker's catch before the field goal attempt, no it wasn't a fumble.
No, this thread was about the fumble caused by Adrian Wilson and picked up by Renaldo Hill but was ruled an incomplete pass.
 

OKCardFan

Registered
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Posts
292
Reaction score
52
Location
OKC, OK
No, this was the I. Bruce catch and fumble that wasn't reviewed because of the whistle! Another bad break for the Cards. :mad:
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
8,492
Reaction score
10,120
Location
Home of the Thunder
The officiating didn't cost us this game.

Passive play calling on defense cost us this game.

WHEN we blitzed, we sacked bluger and forced interceptions.

But when we rushed three or four, we got killed. Plain and simple.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
The thread is about the Wilson tackle that caused the fumble that was called incomplete. It was very, very clear that the reciever caught the ball went three steps and the ball was cleanly knocked out before he was down and absoulutly should have been a fumble recovery and Cardinals first down deep in Lambs back yard. THe official blew the whistle and called the play and because of that which I don't get we were not allowed to challange the obviuos horid call by the ref. That cost us at least three points and in retrospect maybe the game. That being said, 4 and 7 no stop and the two most horrible thrown ball by a qb in a long time Blake!

GBR
 

green machine

I rule at posting
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Posts
6,126
Reaction score
11
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by seesred
The thread is about the Wilson tackle that caused the fumble that was called incomplete. It was very, very clear that the reciever caught the ball went three steps and the ball was cleanly knocked out before he was down and absoulutly should have been a fumble recovery and Cardinals first down deep in Lambs back yard. THe official blew the whistle and called the play and because of that which I don't get we were not allowed to challange the obviuos horid call by the ref. That cost us at least three points and in retrospect maybe the game. That being said, 4 and 7 no stop and the two most horrible thrown ball by a qb in a long time Blake!

GBR

I actually thought that play could have been an incomplete pass. After watching the replay over and over, it looked like the ball was slipping out , and just caught when Wilson hit him. The ball then popped loose. It looked like he did not have full control when Wilson hit him.

adam
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
I saw it the other way, in fact the fans in my section countred the steps after the catch which in my eyes looked to be in his possesion as three. When it was replayed on the scoreboard. Three steps he wasn't down the ball was not called a fumble because the whistle was blown by a anxious official.

GBR
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,906
Reaction score
15,040
Location
Chandler, Az
It was clearly a fumble but as soon as I saw the Ref talking with Mac I knew he was telling him that he couldn't review the play because it was blown dead.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,550
Reaction score
40,359
Originally posted by MadCardDisease
It was clearly a fumble but as soon as I saw the Ref talking with Mac I knew he was telling him that he couldn't review the play because it was blown dead.

Agreed, you could see the look on Mac's face was like "oh man let me guess the whistle blew right?"
 

CardsRep03

Registered
Joined
Apr 5, 2003
Posts
454
Reaction score
0
Location
granite city
The tight end was Brandon Manumaleuna. It was clearly a fumble and the refs didn't call it. How in the world do you NOT call that a fumble? If that were a Cards player they would have called that a fumble. We then would have challenged, chewed our fingernails for a few minutes, then have to listen to, "The ruling on the field stands. The receiver had possession but then lost the ball on the hit. Arizona is charged a time out. Rams ball on the 47. First down."
The Rams did have to punt but we got the ball on the 20 or something. Field position made a difference when we got the ball. That play was a kill shot on the Rams. And we get so few of them that it really hurt not to get it when we finally get one and deserved one. Oh well, I'm just venting here. I think that would have been the beginning of the end for the Rams that day.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,102
Posts
5,452,512
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top