Why “should” we? Why can’t he remain stagnant or even regress? Hollywood is probably better than Kirk, but I’m not even confident that the gap is that big.
Either way, it's not worse is it? Even if Moore is the same and Brown is equal to Kirk (which he isn't) it is at worse equal too. And even that's unlikely.
Added a really bad player & banking on two late Day 3 guys. Yippee
Let's say Hernandez is bad, as you say. Well so was Garcia. The starts he got last year were his 1st since 4 he had in 2018.
Losing Garcia and adding Hernandez, Hayes and Smith while getting Murray back from injury is not a net loss in anyone's head but yours.
A 34 year old who vastly outperformed expectations for a 1st round pick who had an awful lone year.
We talking about the same Alford you have used to criticize Keim for signing because of his injury issues and which you have repeatedly abused here over the past few years? That Alford? Robert Alford?
Dude, you have been criticizing the FO repeatedly for signing Alford, and then Malcolm Butler and any QB north of 30. So he signs a late 1st round pick that's 24 on a cheap deal and you're still not happy.
CB room is not worse. Take the L.
Why should I be sure? Cause he’s a first round pick? It’s a good thing we have a great track record with first round picks under this regime.
Let's see.
On potential cuts "Jordan
Hicks is a liability, especially OCs with actual smart minds. Lets not overthink this."
"Literally everybody on the front 4 is either limited or just old.
Hicks is pretty much both."
On Vance "Yea his adjustments have been incredible but I’m tired of seeing
Hicks over Zaven out there"
Now you get to see what you was calling for last year.