Winning breeds disappointment

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,817
Reaction score
16,391
Location
Plainfield, Il.
It just does. Going into the season I would think that 90% of this board would have taken 7-7 with at least a tiny opportunity for a playoff spot in mid December.
But not now. We had a little taste of success. We were 6-4 on a 4 game winning streak albeit against mainly patsie opponents. But we didn’t care.

Then we lost. Okay. Then we lost again. Dang it. But then we lost again and just like that we were 6-7. The thought of playoff sugar plums dancing in our heads were suddenly dashed.

Would we be happier if we were 3-11? Of course not. But man, when we get a taste of winning the losses just rip your heart out.

Making strides once were looked at with content. But not now. Barring a miracle ending to this 2024 season we will be here debating who needs to be fired, who needs to go and just what we need to do to get to the playoffs.

Every fan goes through it except for one. Every year we as fans are let down. When you ane eliminated from the playoff hunt. When you lose that first playoff game. Even when your team loses the Super Bowl.

The more you win, the bigger the disappointment. It’s just the way it is.
 

Devilmaycare

King of Technicalities
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Posts
8,068
Reaction score
12,392
Location
Scottsdale
Would we be happier if we were 3-11? Of course not. But man, when we get a taste of winning the losses just rip your heart out.
I honestly think I would be. 3 wins would help to force a OC and QB change. Right now we're getting set up to be mired in a bunch of 7-8 win seasons and never getting real tractions going. Mikey B's always been fine treading water like that.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
16,084
Reaction score
8,082
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
I honestly think I would be. 3 wins would help to force a OC and QB change. Right now we're getting set up to be mired in a bunch of 7-8 win seasons and never getting real tractions going. Mikey B's always been fine treading water like that.
Maybe, but it could also force MO to try and build the defense into a great defense. They're playing above expectations so it's possible a few pieces could make it great.

Then our run first, field position, and time of possession game means K1 doesn't have to be great. Just like today he wasn't great but good enough to win.
 

cardcrazy

Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Posts
835
Reaction score
1,240
I’m pretty happy with 7-7 at this point of the season.
I would consider a 9-8 record in JGs second season a success (10-7 would be unexpectedly welcome, and a playoff game, I would be one proud Card fan!)
It’s an improvement over 4-13 and a….winning record.
We have seen the offense click and when they did it was pretty impressive.
The defense has played with intensity and heart and fairly consistently.
I’m an optimist and I think we can build on this season and with some more pieces, be a contender next year.
IMO KM and JG showed improvement and deserve not only another chance but our backing for next year!
Go Cards! Let’s get this thing going!
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,035
Reaction score
39,559
It's because for me, the Viking game we should have won and getting dominated twice by Seattle is hard to explain.

I watched a bunch of seattle and Green Bay today, the Packers are better than us we know that they handled us easily, but they just basically destroyed Seattle. Take away the one fumble and that game is a complete rout. Green Bay on offense didn't have near as much trouble with the Seahawks DL as we did, Love had time to throw and as a result guys open. Seattle's DL just completely destroyed our OL both times.

So that's kind of hard to look at and NOT think how far we are away from a team like the Packers
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,413
Reaction score
39,920
Location
Las Vegas
It's because for me, the Viking game we should have won and getting dominated twice by Seattle is hard to explain.

I watched a bunch of seattle and Green Bay today, the Packers are better than us we know that they handled us easily, but they just basically destroyed Seattle. Take away the one fumble and that game is a complete rout. Green Bay on offense didn't have near as much trouble with the Seahawks DL as we did, Love had time to throw and as a result guys open. Seattle's DL just completely destroyed our OL both times.

So that's kind of hard to look at and NOT think how far we are away from a team like the Packers
That would be great if that’s how the nfl worked… every game is different.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,035
Reaction score
39,559
That would be great if that’s how the nfl worked… every game is different.

Oh sure but the fundamental things in our 2 losses to Seattle were turnovers by Kyler, and that our OL couldn't block them. We couldn't run, and we couldn't run our offense because they destroyed us. Pressure, holding penalties, false starts it was a complete mismatch. in Seattle ok it's a noisy stadium, in Arizona, they still manhandled our OL.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,044
Reaction score
24,443
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I honestly think I would be. 3 wins would help to force a OC and QB change. Right now we're getting set up to be mired in a bunch of 7-8 win seasons and never getting real tractions going. Mikey B's always been fine treading water like that.
Someone compared it to the Jeff Fisher Rams. I think that's our high end if we keep rolling it back with Kyler and Monti keeps spurning to spend his FA dollars.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,229
Reaction score
23,671
Someone compared it to the Jeff Fisher Rams. I think that's our high end if we keep rolling it back with Kyler and Monti keeps spurning to spend his FA dollars.
Jeff Fisher Rams never finished with a winning record or even .500. It’s very possible we finish above that. I don’t think that’s a good comp at all.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,044
Reaction score
24,443
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Jeff Fisher Rams never finished with a winning record or even .500. It’s very possible we finish above that. I don’t think that’s a good comp at all.
The comp was referring to the team always hovering near .500, never breaking through, teasing a trip to the playoffs but never delivering. Perhaps we squeak into the playoffs a year for a first round loss, but that would be about it. If we upgrade on Kyler or Monti does finally fully try to build a team in an offseason, the comp could change for me. Until then, I think it's a good comp for the reasons I described.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,229
Reaction score
23,671
The comp was referring to the team always hovering near .500, never breaking through, teasing a trip to the playoffs but never delivering. Perhaps we squeak into the playoffs a year for a first round loss, but that would be about it. If we upgrade on Kyler or Monti does finally fully try to build a team in an offseason, the comp could change for me. Until then, I think it's a good comp for the reasons I described.
Except the Jeff Fisher Rams never did any of what you said.

They never were .500
They never teased a trip to the playoffs.
They were always undisciplined.
They underachieved relative to their talent level while it looks like we’ll overachieve to where our current talent level is at.


I’m sorry, but that comp is just an awful one. There has gotta be much better ones out there.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,246
Reaction score
26,787
Location
Orlando, FL
I started out expecting 8-9. The Robinson injury and other Dline injury losses hurt more than many realized. As the season progressed I thought the Cards were better than Seattle and 10 wins was possible. I was wrong. 2 losses prove Seattle was better. So much of success in the NFL is about individual matchups. The Seattle teams Dline tackle strength was too much for the Cards. So the Cards will end up about where I expected. I’m satisfied as I believe it’s plausible to achieve significant improvement this off season. I also think the vast majority of Ossenfort’s moves last season were successful. There has been criticism about unmade moves, but I think he wanted to see how the moves he made worked out before committing too much capital in that direction. That may be conservative, but seems logical. He’s new to the job. On the whole, the coaching staff has exceeded expectations. My main criticism of that staff would be WR development. Fundamental skills such as coming back or mirroring the direction of a scrambling QB have not been taught. If taught they are not being enforced. I realize the lack of overall speed condenses the receiving plane, hindering separation. Also Oline weakness has limited pocket time, again impacting deep routes and double moves. These are easily correctable. The Cards need a reliable speed receiver and also acquiring a developmental prospect would seem the needed direction. Still I want a new WR coach. On the whole the Cards seem on the correct path.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,044
Reaction score
24,443
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Except the Jeff Fisher Rams never did any of what you said.

They never were .500
They never teased a trip to the playoffs.
They were always undisciplined.
They underachieved relative to their talent level while it looks like we’ll overachieve to where our current talent level is at.


I’m sorry, but that comp is just an awful one. There has gotta be much better ones out there.
Way to misquote. I said hovered near .500, not WERE .500. Which is 100 percent accurate. You are wrong there.

Never teased a trip to the playoffs? They always seemed to be "in the hunt" but never got there while underachieving. How else do you tease a trip to the playoffs, pray tell? Do you have to be seconds away from securing the playoffs? Do you have a dictionary definition I am unaware of? LOL

I can agree with your other points. That's why it's a comp and not a direct correlation, especially given the sources of the underachievement. There are definite similarities. You don't personally like the comp so you declare it awful. Par for the course.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: urs

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,044
Reaction score
24,443
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Keep this doomer nonsense in the darksiders thread.

Lighten up Eor
Honestly, you gave me a laugh as I imagined you pouting and throwing a "Stout's ruining the message board!" tantrum behind your keyboard.

I mean, a guy obsessed with one player telling another poster exactly how to post. Another good laugh!
 

602 Native

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
1,994
Reaction score
4,006
Location
Gilbert
Honestly, you gave me a laugh as I imagined you pouting and throwing a "Stout's ruining the message board!" tantrum behind your keyboard.

I mean, a guy obsessed with one player telling another poster exactly how to post. Another good laugh!

I’m just a realist masquerading as an optimist.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,229
Reaction score
23,671
You don't personally like the comp so you declare it awful. Par for the course.
It’s not about me not liking it. It’s just an awful comp, Stout. I know you’re much better than that.
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,306
Reaction score
15,466
Location
Charlotte
Someone compared it to the Jeff Fisher Rams. I think that's our high end if we keep rolling it back with Kyler and Monti keeps spurning to spend his FA dollars.

We are in year 2 of MO/JG...looking at double the wins with a subpar roster.

Completely over performing based on 90% of Cardinal fans this year.

Comparing this to Jeff Fisher? C'mon man!
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,998
Reaction score
58,821
Location
SoCal
We are in year 2 of MO/JG...looking at double the wins with a subpar roster.

Completely over performing based on 90% of Cardinal fans this year.

Comparing this to Jeff Fisher? C'mon man!
90%? Is that what the preseason poll showed? I recall a lot of people thinking we’d win 7-10 games this season.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
555,502
Posts
5,427,770
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top