Zaven Collins re-signs for two more years

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,739
Reaction score
23,887
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Zaven was decent at everything other than getting to the QB last year. Lorenzo Alexander talked about him during the off-season and was saying that from his film study, the Cardinals didn't really just unleash him as a pass rusher and that they needed to let him just go and do it.

I think with BJ's injury, the Cardinals are now kind of forced to use him as a pass rusher quite a bit more. They also have to consider using Mack Wilson at edge too.

White BJ didn't show much last year, the Cardinals were expecting a big jump, so it's a huge loss overall.
I agree with all of this, but we already had him under contract. No need to extend his deal. It just tells me Monti still doesn't plan to adequately address the Edge position, will sit on a ton of cap space yet again, and won't be aggressive at all at filling one of the most important position groups on the field.

Hooray insanely conservative GM.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
I agree with all of this, but we already had him under contract. No need to extend his deal. It just tells me Monti still doesn't plan to adequately address the Edge position, will sit on a ton of cap space yet again, and won't be aggressive at all at filling one of the most important position groups on the field.

Hooray insanely conservative GM.
I think it tells you that Collins is an interim plan. He's being paid like a mid-level edge free agent would be. VERY LITTLE downside to this and way more upside.

In the unlikely event that Collins becomes a very good starter, the Cardinals have him locked in at a very affordable rate, and if he doesn't, you still aren't paying him top money.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,739
Reaction score
23,887
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I think it tells you that Collins is an interim plan. He's being paid like a mid-level edge free agent would be. VERY LITTLE downside to this and way more upside.

In the unlikely event that Collins becomes a very good starter, the Cardinals have him locked in at a very affordable rate, and if he doesn't, you still aren't paying him top money.
For the board being mostly in the conservative build and save money camp, they're definitely loose with wasting money. Why pay extra for a JAG? Save the 3-4 mill per year and spend it wisely elsewhere. (I know, I don't have faith they would spend it, but still). Same with extending JC multiple years rather than just year at a time. It doesn't fit the mold people seem to want us to follow.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,062
Reaction score
1,745
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
This

He's a JAG and more in the $3-4 mil slot to me
Lavonte David and Jordan Hicks got contracts in the same range as Collins. Collins is much younger, rated higher in his first year in a new scheme and essentially position. I would take Collins any day over both of them considering where they are in their careers.
 
Last edited:

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,126
Reaction score
28,349
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
How many plays last year did we say wow look at that play Collins made?

He did his job but nothing spectacular, no big plays just doing what he's supposed to do. To me that's just another guy
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,445
Reaction score
7,401
Location
Chandler
For the board being mostly in the conservative build and save money camp, they're definitely loose with wasting money. Why pay extra for a JAG? Save the 3-4 mill per year and spend it wisely elsewhere. (I know, I don't have faith they would spend it, but still). Same with extending JC multiple years rather than just year at a time. It doesn't fit the mold people seem to want us to follow.
First you complain about keeping the powder dry, then when they do use it to extend a player they like, you bitch about that too. Which is it? Do you want them to keep the powder dry or do you want them to use it to extend players who they like & feel are contributors?
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,355
Reaction score
68,426
First you complain about keeping the powder dry, then when they do use it to extend a player they like, you bitch about that too. Which is it? Do you want them to keep the powder dry or do you want them to use it to extend players who they like & feel are contributors?

False choice. He wants them to extend players HE thinks are worthwhile contributors. He obviously doesn’t think Zaven is one of those. Presenting the idea that he speaking out of both sides of his mouth while projecting an argument on to Stout that he’s not making is lame.
 
Last edited:

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,171
Reaction score
16,243
Location
Modesto, California
For the board being mostly in the conservative build and save money camp, they're definitely loose with wasting money. Why pay extra for a JAG? Save the 3-4 mill per year and spend it wisely elsewhere. (I know, I don't have faith they would spend it, but still). Same with extending JC multiple years rather than just year at a time. It doesn't fit the mold people seem to want us to follow.
Question...
You do actually know that there is more to playing OLB than just rushing the passer....right?
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,445
Reaction score
7,401
Location
Chandler
False choice. He wants them to extend players HE thinks are worthwhile contributors. He obviously doesn’t think Zaven is one of those. Presenting the idea that he speaking out of both sides of his mouth while projecting an argument on to Stout that he’s not making is lame.
Okay?
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,171
Reaction score
16,243
Location
Modesto, California
How many plays last year did we say wow look at that play Collins made?

He did his job but nothing spectacular, no big plays just doing what he's supposed to do. To me that's just another guy
Except if he was just a JAG a lot of those unremarkable boring routine plays would have instead been bigger plays for the offense.
The absolute best players a team can have are guys who make the routine play consistently.
Like many, I would prefer Collins be a better pass rusher... but I also appreciate that while lacking in pass rush he has so far performed every other function of his position very well.
Considering he is relatively new at olb we may still see improvements in his pass rushing. But his contract is a fair deal even if we don't
 
Last edited:

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,739
Reaction score
23,887
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
First you complain about keeping the powder dry, then when they do use it to extend a player they like, you bitch about that too. Which is it? Do you want them to keep the powder dry or do you want them to use it to extend players who they like & feel are contributors?
So you're saying I should just be cool with the team wasting money? It's not like I'm Steve Keim. Also, I was commenting on other posters opinions on spending? But whatever.

Maybe they shouldn't burn money on JAGs (my opinion) or extending older RBs for multiple seasons but actually spend money on the edge room? I would like them to spend money on players I think are worth it without mortgaging the future and not sit on tons of cap space. That should be a very easy concept to understand.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,739
Reaction score
23,887
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
False choice. He wants them to extend players HE thinks are worthwhile contributors. He obviously doesn’t think Zaven is one of those. Presenting the idea that he speaking out of both sides of his mouth while projecting an argument on to Stout that he’s not making is lame.
Dang, my strategy of responding as I read is flawed, as I should have just left this post stand as response.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
For the board being mostly in the conservative build and save money camp, they're definitely loose with wasting money. Why pay extra for a JAG?
Because the Cardinals don't think Collins is a JAG? I don't think he's a JAG, I think he's a solid LB who played his first games at edge last year and didn't make the impact we want as a rusher but did everything else better than a "JAG".
Save the 3-4 mill per year and spend it wisely elsewhere. (I know, I don't have faith they would spend it, but still). Same with extending JC multiple years rather than just year at a time. It doesn't fit the mold people seem to want us to follow.
Im just going to LULZ hard at this statement. Which is it @Stout? Keep the powder dry or spend?

I appreciate your perspective overall and I agree that more can be done, but Zaven Collins is a better player than you are portraying.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,547
Posts
5,407,929
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top