FJM23
Newbie
Is no one else outraged at the rules set for the tiebreaker and the play-in game? They are potentially ridiculous.
First off, if 2 teams tie for the 8th spot with identical records, the 9-seed still has to beat the 8 seed twice? What sense does that make? Basically the NBA was too short-sighted (stupid) to think that 2 teams could possibly tie. If the Suns win, Memphis wins and Portland loses, why in the world should the Suns have to beat the Grizzles twice in a row? It’s insane. Or even if a team is a half game behind, a one play-in game is more fair to decide it, not 2.
Secondly, if a team is a half game behind the last playoff spot, that should not count against them. Portland has an extra game played, and the Spurs played 2 less. With the imbalanced schedule, the league should have anticipated that and factored in the half game as a tolerance.
Thirdly, what if there is a 3 way tie? Fans will have to watch 2 teams play a best of 2 series while the other team sits at home? Dumb.
Today, if you’re Adam Silver, you make an announcement that any teams within a half game of the 8th spot are in the play-in round. If all 4 teams (Suns, Blazers, Grizzlies, Spurs) qualify then you go 1 v 4 and 2 v 3 and then winners next day. If 3 teams qualify you go 2 v 3 then winner v 1. It will take the same amount of days. And if only 2 teams are exactly tied then only a one game play-in game is necessary.
Who would be opposed to that? Wouldn’t a 4 team mini-tournament add a lot more juice to the playoffs?
Oh, you can’t change rules this late? Why not. This is not a normal season, all bets are off. MLB started playing 7 inning games mid-season for gods sake.
First off, if 2 teams tie for the 8th spot with identical records, the 9-seed still has to beat the 8 seed twice? What sense does that make? Basically the NBA was too short-sighted (stupid) to think that 2 teams could possibly tie. If the Suns win, Memphis wins and Portland loses, why in the world should the Suns have to beat the Grizzles twice in a row? It’s insane. Or even if a team is a half game behind, a one play-in game is more fair to decide it, not 2.
Secondly, if a team is a half game behind the last playoff spot, that should not count against them. Portland has an extra game played, and the Spurs played 2 less. With the imbalanced schedule, the league should have anticipated that and factored in the half game as a tolerance.
Thirdly, what if there is a 3 way tie? Fans will have to watch 2 teams play a best of 2 series while the other team sits at home? Dumb.
Today, if you’re Adam Silver, you make an announcement that any teams within a half game of the 8th spot are in the play-in round. If all 4 teams (Suns, Blazers, Grizzlies, Spurs) qualify then you go 1 v 4 and 2 v 3 and then winners next day. If 3 teams qualify you go 2 v 3 then winner v 1. It will take the same amount of days. And if only 2 teams are exactly tied then only a one game play-in game is necessary.
Who would be opposed to that? Wouldn’t a 4 team mini-tournament add a lot more juice to the playoffs?
Oh, you can’t change rules this late? Why not. This is not a normal season, all bets are off. MLB started playing 7 inning games mid-season for gods sake.