I really don't understand why you give them credit for striking out to bad pitches, which is what the KD deal was, rather than waiting to swing on a decent throw. A decent throw was inevitable, BTW. We had a ton of assets we could have used in a way that made more sense for the team we had.
2024-2025 Around the NBA Thread
- Thread starter Chaplin
- Start date
I really don't understand why you give them credit for striking out to bad pitches, which is what the KD deal was, rather than waiting to swing on a decent throw. A decent throw was inevitable, BTW. We had a ton of assets we could have used in a way that made more sense for the team we had.
I don't get why you don't understand that if you don't swing there is no shot at a home run. Just like in real life you won't always get the perfect lob over the plate.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Looks like he was showing signs 2 seasons ago and then fell off the map last season.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,166
- Reaction score
- 58,466
AJ Griffin is only a youngster. He should have a solid NBA career ahead of him.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,166
- Reaction score
- 58,466
Here are the best remaining free agents. The Suns do have an open roster spot should they choose to use it.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I acknowledged that. You seem to be neglecting the fact there is more ways to drive in a run than smashing a homer. You can't muscle bad pitches that are high and outside out of the park either.
Phrazbit
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Posts
- 20,318
- Reaction score
- 11,397
It is far more nuanced than that. I generally think the entire analogy is silly.
If a trade has an overwhelming chance of being a complete disaster... don't do it.
It wasn't even like it had this HUGE chance to increase our chances for a title, we were already a really good team, the increase in odds was marginal and the risk of failure was to a level of extreme that there is little precedence.
Phrazbit
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Posts
- 20,318
- Reaction score
- 11,397
Not sure where he lies on the chart of "Malcontent/Diva/Cancer", but he certainly shows up.
Getting coaches fired, sometimes openly campaigning for it, trashing teammates using burner accounts online... not a good look.
Phrazbit
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Posts
- 20,318
- Reaction score
- 11,397
After reading how much moving Little saved them in tax, I don't see them using that last spot until they have an obvious need.
It makes sense anyway, none of those guys would sniff the court unless we had an injury, but you don't know where the injury will fall... so wait until you see where you have the need.
OP
OP
Chaplin
Better off silent
He said he was a cancer. I'm not making that up.
Without talking about Brooklyn or OKC, tell me one instance where he's been on the Suns where he was a cancer.
If his past is that big of a problem for you and others, don't forget to throw Grayson Allen into that same bucket as well.
Last edited:
Driving in runs or watching pitches go by is what the Suns have been doing for 56 years. We are not the Lakers who get a ton of lobs over home plate. If you want to hit a home run we have to take more chances than a team like that.
I don't disagree about the analogy. However, hindsight is always 20/20. Most analyst across the league thought the trade had huge potential. We had a team that was headed in the wrong direction and with all the moves other teams had we were getting further away and not closer. We are not the Lakers or some team that players like Lebron are going to run to. So, we likely have to take risks other teams don't. 56 years. 56 years of of what we have been doing has not worked.
We acquired a known cancer and you're ignoring that simply because he wears a Suns jersey. How many seasons has he been here and how many coaches have we had? Of course he has nothing to do with that right?
This. Past behavior is definitely a risk. However, it's not a factor until he starts doing that crap here. Having said that? If he ever decides he wants out? I have no doubt (just like I did at the time of the trade) that he could definitely turn that crap on in a flash. However, I am not going to use that to bolster an argument that is what was wrong with the Suns last year.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,760
- Reaction score
- 16,531
Wow.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,166
- Reaction score
- 58,466
None of the current available free agents excite me either, but the Suns have to do better than adding a player like Isaiah Thomas late in the season and they wasted a roster spot on an injured Damion Lee as well.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,166
- Reaction score
- 58,466
It's as simple as the Suns made a bad trade in acquiring Durant. They gave up too much.
Now leave Mikal Bridges out of the equation and we are very close to being on the same page. Trading Mikal Bridges was a dealbreaker for me.
Trading Mikal and Cam was a dealbreaker for me. 1 young talent? Ok, 2 and every pick we could legally deal? Why not throw in Crowder, whose value was low at that point because of JJ's idiocy. Brooklyn immediately turned him into 5 2nd round picks, IIRC. There wasn't a single concession made by Brooklyn. The final deal was worse than the rumored deals during the off-season. Brooklyn had much less leverage than the Suns as well. JJ was taken to school but I really don't think he learned from it.
We have been down the same roads over over (building through the draft, fielding fun teams, making team barely competitive, trying to build around one star etc. etc. etc.) for the last 56 years and still have zero titles. It's that simple for me.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,166
- Reaction score
- 58,466
I had Mikal Bridges entering the star phase. So the Suns already had two stars in Booker and Bridges and in position to improve the team without breaking the bank asset wise.
Look at what the Nets received in trade for Bridges, which demonstrates his value.
Knicks acquire Mikal Bridges from Nets for haul of picks, Bojan Bogdanovic | NBA.com
New York will send five 1st-round picks to Brooklyn, among other assets, in exchange for veteran forward Mikal Bridges.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,166
- Reaction score
- 58,466
I think the Suns had to give up something (Cam Johnson) to get something, but I wouldn't have included Mikal Bridges.
The Nets could have wanted him in the trade all they wanted, but my answer would have always been no.
We agree, the Suns were taken to school in the Durant trade.
Mikael Bridges fell back down to earth. A 2 star team of Booker/Bridges isn't going to get it done.I had Mikal Bridges entering the star phase. So the Suns already had two stars in Booker and Bridges and in position to improve the team without breaking the bank asset wise.
Look at what the Nets received in trade for Bridges, which demonstrates his value.
Knicks acquire Mikal Bridges from Nets for haul of picks, Bojan Bogdanovic | NBA.com
New York will send five 1st-round picks to Brooklyn, among other assets, in exchange for veteran forward Mikal Bridges.www.nba.com
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 118,166
- Reaction score
- 58,466
However, the Suns had all their draft picks and assets to trade if they hadn't locked onto a one-sided trade.
Kevin Durant wasn't the only fish in the sea.
Of his caliber? Who else was clamoring to come here? What other Superstar was there for us to trade for where the other ownership side was willing as well? Plugging Superstars into trade machines doesn't make it feasible.
