Chase Field

Ronin

Captain obvious
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
147,664
Reaction score
69,374
Location
Crowley, TX

Alex Weiner

@alexjweiner
·
32m

New Maricopa County Board Chairman Thomas Galvin on the D-backs:"I can assure you the Board will work very hard with the Diamondbacks on addressing the future of Chase Field. I see my role in this as looking out for the tax payers best interest, that's my line in the sand."
 

Lorenzo

Registered User
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Posts
10,845
Reaction score
5,763
Location
Vegas
I hope Phoenix figure out a way to keep them downtown. As an outsider I loved my experience at Chase Field. and phoenix have definitely improved their freeway system with the 303 and 202 sections. In texas or California those would be tolls, I almost felt guilty driving on it without paying. save for the small 22 mile stretch of IH 40, driving from Vegas to Phoenix is one of my favorite drives. As someone that grew up near Dallas and lived in Arlington, I hate that Arlington has the cowboys and rangers.
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
83,650
Reaction score
43,798
Location
South Scottsdale
No tax payer money to sports teams any longer. If they can't afford it then sell the team. Subsidizing billionaires
This is the same funding mechanism for the Cardinals Stadium

D-backs CEO and president Derrick Hall told the Arizona Republic that the team has pitched a plan that would take 5% of the 5.6% of sales taxes that already exist at Chase Field to send to a fund (0.6% will continue to fund education). The bill’s primary author, Republican Rep. Jeff Weninger of Chandler, and Hall emphasized to the newspaper that the bill introduced does not add any taxes but redistributes them...
The Diamondbacks project the bill as proposed would provide $15 million to $20 million each year, according to the Republic.

HB2704 says the money recaptured by sales and income taxes would cover “reconstructing, equipping, repairing, maintaining or improving the major league baseball facility owned and operated by the district.”
 

jf-08

chohan
Administrator
Super Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,242
Reaction score
24,391
Location
Eye in the Sky
This is the same funding mechanism for the Cardinals Stadium

D-backs CEO and president Derrick Hall told the Arizona Republic that the team has pitched a plan that would take 5% of the 5.6% of sales taxes that already exist at Chase Field to send to a fund (0.6% will continue to fund education). The bill’s primary author, Republican Rep. Jeff Weninger of Chandler, and Hall emphasized to the newspaper that the bill introduced does not add any taxes but redistributes them...
The Diamondbacks project the bill as proposed would provide $15 million to $20 million each year, according to the Republic.

HB2704 says the money recaptured by sales and income taxes would cover “reconstructing, equipping, repairing, maintaining or improving the major league baseball facility owned and operated by the district.”
Sounds reasonable to me.
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
15,015
Reaction score
7,392
Location
Mesa, AZ
This is the same funding mechanism for the Cardinals Stadium

D-backs CEO and president Derrick Hall told the Arizona Republic that the team has pitched a plan that would take 5% of the 5.6% of sales taxes that already exist at Chase Field to send to a fund (0.6% will continue to fund education). The bill’s primary author, Republican Rep. Jeff Weninger of Chandler, and Hall emphasized to the newspaper that the bill introduced does not add any taxes but redistributes them...
The Diamondbacks project the bill as proposed would provide $15 million to $20 million each year, according to the Republic.

HB2704 says the money recaptured by sales and income taxes would cover “reconstructing, equipping, repairing, maintaining or improving the major league baseball facility owned and operated by the district.”
I read the article and do not care. Makes no mistake I don’t want them to leave but I am fully against subsidizing sports when other uses for that money are maybe…possibly…more important than a professional sports team whose owner is sitting on a mountain of money. The days of supporting that nonsense are over for me
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,488
Reaction score
8,649
Location
Scottsdale
I read the article and do not care. Makes no mistake I don’t want them to leave but I am fully against subsidizing sports when other uses for that money are maybe…possibly…more important than a professional sports team whose owner is sitting on a mountain of money. The days of supporting that nonsense are over for me
Keep in mind the stadium us often used for non Diamondback purposes. Maricopa County owns the building and as the owner of a structure that is used for other purposes beyond Dback games, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the owner to find a way to contribute toward the upkeep and renovation of their own structure...
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
15,015
Reaction score
7,392
Location
Mesa, AZ
Keep in mind the stadium us often used for non Diamondback purposes. Maricopa County owns the building and as the owner of a structure that is used for other purposes beyond Dback games, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the owner to find a way to contribute toward the upkeep and renovation of their own structure...
I understand that.
 

AZ Native

Living is Easy with Eyes Closed
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Posts
16,147
Reaction score
8,740
Location
Cave Creek
Keep in mind the stadium us often used for non Diamondback purposes. Maricopa County owns the building and as the owner of a structure that is used for other purposes beyond Dback games, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the owner to find a way to contribute toward the upkeep and renovation of their own structure...
Damn the facts 82.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
559,427
Posts
5,463,995
Members
6,337
Latest member
rattle
Top