- Joined
- Jul 22, 2002
- Posts
- 15,451
- Reaction score
- 14,743
They’ve spent three top 45 picks on linebackers, and only one played linebacker in college.
nothing Steve Keim likes more than a projection …..
They’ve spent three top 45 picks on linebackers, and only one played linebacker in college.
Very interesting article. They are actually simplifying the defense in some ways and it seems to me each player on defense has one and just one individual assignment based on the defensive alignment called. The other thing I get out of it is you wold probably use quicker leaner dlinemen since some of their responsibilities can be pass coverage.Thank you for linking to the article, Cardpa!
The other day I read an article that examines how defenses can counter the explosive offenses nowadays. It is based on statements and analyses from both defensive- and offensive minds at various levels. You can read it by clicking here.
The conclusion is that you need hybrid defenders.
Also, out of everyone on the Cards’ defense, Budda Baker might be the one who are being deployed at most different positions, and I don’t think he has been a disappointment to anyone.
It would literally never happen but nobody in the NFL is better at getting high production out of terrible players than Billhttps://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...dered-leaving-pats-as-recently-as-late-march/
Bill isn't NOT my favorite coach but you kinda have to think he might make a good GM? I dunno I'm just putting this out there.
Having a high pick, tons of cap room, tons of upside.... I don't know......
Very interesting article. They are actually simplifying the defense in some ways and it seems to me each player on defense has one and just one individual assignment based on the defensive alignment called.
I read it the same way, but I think the main point is that multiple different players can plays these simplified assignments which, in my opinion, correlates well with how Keim continuously has selected hybrid defenders in the draft. It’s probably a stretch to say that he has been ahead of the time, since several other general managers has done the same, but you could definitely say that he has been very up to date, if you agree with the points in the article.
The defenses in the NFL haven't caught up with the philosophy of the article yet. Some may be moving that way.
The real problem for the Cardinals is Wilks is oblivious to this kind of thinking and is stuck in a slowly yet surely archaic philosophy on defense. Quickness and speed are imperative to run a defense per the article.
That’s right, but I think one of the reasons is that what the coaches in the article suggest simply isn’t possible in the NFL. At least not with as much success as they have had. They are coaching at various youth levels.
I don’t think that is fair. Budda Baker is a safety who are often being deployed as a linebacker. Haason Reddick was a defensive lineman in college, and now he is alternately deployed as a defensive lineman, an off the ball linebacker and designated blitzer. Deone Bucannon was a linebacker in college yet is now deployed as a linebacker. Chandler Jones is a defensive lineman who often drops into coverage.
Also, Steve Wilks and Al Holcomb often deploys different players in different ways that makes them do things that are usually not expected at their primary position.
I don’t want to stigmatize, but is there any chance you are mad at Wilks, and thus criticize him for basically everything no matter if they are correct and fair or not?
I'm not mad at Wilks, more like disappointed that he has not been the coach we were sold on. I wasn't sure of him when he was hired but you have to give the guy a chance. What I never expected was for Wilks to fail as spectacularly as he has. Carolina had a pretty good defense in 2017, but now I wonder if Wilks was the main reason. Maybe all the negativity here about Wilks has shaded my view of him. Thanks for pointing that out. I still blame Keim for this mess more than anyone else.