1st overall pick, who do we take?

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,979
Reaction score
1,059
Location
In The End Zone
Just kidding.

Well, no. I'm not. Ugh. That was One Heartbeat. Gross. Barf.

Is it Rosentime yet?
 

AZ Shocker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Posts
1,271
Reaction score
71
Location
E. Valley
Who do we take???

A freaking monster of a linebacker that can crack skulls at the line of scrimmage preventing a 3rd and short becoming a 1st down.

Wait....
there is no one. There is no type of player anymore. Well wait. Maybe there is one we can grab from Stanford or maybe Cal-Berkely maybe. Let's ask the NFL.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,509
Reaction score
7,771
Dwayne Haskins. He throws the best ball I have seen in a LONG time. Big, quick release, and an absolute hose for an arm. Oh yeah, extremely accurate too.

How OSU could start JT Barret over this guy is amazing. Watch him Saturday night vs. TCU.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,123
Reaction score
39,694
Right now I'd lean to Ed Oliver if we actually get that pick but it's way too early you have to hope some LB prospects emerge as well since that's probably our biggest need, along with WR.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,256
Reaction score
23,762
Dwayne Haskins. He throws the best ball I have seen in a LONG time. Big, quick release, and an absolute hose for an arm. Oh yeah, extremely accurate too.

How OSU could start JT Barret over this guy is amazing. Watch him Saturday night vs. TCU.
Do you like mean....for another team?
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,441
Reaction score
16,671
Location
Modesto, California
Oliver....right now it looks like dline will help us more than lb as crazy as that sounds.
Then lb with the first pick in the second....either wr or ot in the third
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
You have to start with the front seven, unless a premiere CB is there.

Cards should have been putting a premium on drafting front seven even when they were winning and the D was an elite unit as a whole. Keim didn't go there enough IMO.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,066
Reaction score
13,839
You have to start with the front seven, unless a premiere CB is there.

Cards should have been putting a premium on drafting front seven even when they were winning and the D was an elite unit as a whole. Keim didn't go there enough IMO.

3 of the last 4 first round picks have been front 7 defensive platers
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
3 of the last 4 first round picks have been front 7 defensive platers
I'm talking about as far back as the 2013 season, and the early rounds, 1-3

Not nearly enough high impact players at DE or LB. It wasn't a big deal when your DLine was elite at the time...

The 2017 draft was a real head scratcher for me, taking only one front seven guy. Especially following Arians' departure.

My point is even when you're currently having success with your front seven personnel you should always be drafting as though you aren't good enough and need more talent there...always. It's too important.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,047
Reaction score
58,936
Location
SoCal
You have to start with the front seven, unless a premiere CB is there.

Cards should have been putting a premium on drafting front seven even when they were winning and the D was an elite unit as a whole. Keim didn't go there enough IMO.
Three of his first round selections went to the front seven (nkemdiche, buc, and Reddick). They just either suck or haven’t shown much.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,047
Reaction score
58,936
Location
SoCal
I'm talking about as far back as the 2013 season, and the early rounds, 1-3

Not nearly enough high impact players at DE or LB. It wasn't a big deal when your DLine was elite at the time...

The 2017 draft was a real head scratcher for me, taking only one front seven guy. Especially following Arians' departure.

My point is even when you're currently having success with your front seven personnel you should always be drafting as though you aren't good enough and need more talent there...always. It's too important.
I don’t disagree with you there. Or at least keep acquiring front seven help, doesn’t have to be via the draft. Look at the Seahawks.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,066
Reaction score
13,839
I'm talking about as far back as the 2013 season, and the early rounds, 1-3

Not nearly enough high impact players at DE or LB. It wasn't a big deal when your DLine was elite at the time...

The 2017 draft was a real head scratcher for me, taking only one front seven guy. Especially following Arians' departure.

My point is even when you're currently having success with your front seven personnel you should always be drafting as though you aren't good enough and need more talent there...always. It's too important.

You have to remember your building a TEAM, it's not that easy to try and balance it out and if your strong up front on defense and your offensive line is trash then you should probably draft an O-lineman not spend a high pick on a guy that's going to be a backup and depth pick.

2017 so that was LB, WR, multiple OL men. All positions of need. This team isn't good enough to start spending picks at depth we have to many holes to fill
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Trade the pick for a bunch of mediocre later rounders.

I'm especially fond of meh receivers who run in the low 4.6's.
 
Top