Agreed. However, our coaches were given a 21-point, late 3rd quarter advantage and could not determine how to put what limited talent we have in place to finish. Moreover, it seems that loser franchises have these signature moments enough that when things seem to begin unraveling, they indeed quickly do. Yet another all around embarrassing disaster for this organization.
2-0 against the spread!
- Thread starter slanidrac16
- Start date
CardNots
ASFN Addict
As a bettor no way I put money down on the Cardinals for either of those games. Now the next two, I’d easily fork over funds giving up the points
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2002
- Posts
- 15,453
- Reaction score
- 14,745
DVOA says the Cards are better than 0-2
so there is that
the team looks exactly like a high effort, well coached team that doesnt have enough talent
they can hang with teams for 3 quarters and then the coaching advantage wrinkles get figured out and fatigue takes the "try harder" edge off
so there is that
the team looks exactly like a high effort, well coached team that doesnt have enough talent
they can hang with teams for 3 quarters and then the coaching advantage wrinkles get figured out and fatigue takes the "try harder" edge off
Stout
Hold onto the ball, Murray!
I would agree for 6 of the 8 quarters. The second half of that game, bar the scoring drive, the coaching was atrocious. Not figured out, just purposefully turtling. Otherwise I agree and have been pleasantly surprised.
kerouac9
Klowned by Keim
How do you see the “well-coached” part? We’re near the top of the league in penalties.
Still really early on DVOA; the one-score nature of these losses will push us closer to .500 because one play here or there changes the outcome.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2005
- Posts
- 46,411
- Reaction score
- 12,131
I wouldn't go as far as to say well coached, but I would say coached better than expected.
