scotsman13:
marbury's contract was signed before he ever came to the suns and it is the standard for a top flight player.
I'm referring to his gaudy extension, which he signed this summer after having been with the Suns for two years.
marion is a great player who has earned his max contract by being a great person and a 20 and 10 player at the small forward spot.
Unfortunately, overpaying players for being "great people" is not the way you build a champion.
so yes i can hold him to the fact that he broke his team and that he has never gone past the first round of the playoffs.
Yes, you can. But both he and his ball club have learned from their previous mistake. Garnett took a (relatively) modest extension, and starting next season, the Wolves will benefit.
George O'Brien:
If you let a player go, then the question is whether that player can be replaced in the free agent market THAT YEAR.
The Suns overpaid Marbury and Marion long before they had any chance of leaving through free agency.
I would prefer that he did not gamble so much on two players, but I am also sure the Suns would be even worse off if they left.
There's an enormous middle ground that you are overlooking.
The Suns could have waited another year for Marion to be a restricted free agent, then matched whatever the going rate was. The Clippers did that with Brand and Maggette, and so far it seems to have worked out just fine.
With Marbury, due to CBA rules, no team in the league could have offered him as much as the Suns did -- not even a team under the cap. They could have offered him an extension more in line with what another team could theoretically pay.