2007-08 outlook: Who's improved thanks to offseason moves?

azirish

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Posts
3,876
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
This is from ESPN Insider, but is a "Free Preview"

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insi...age=offseasonwinners&univLogin02=stateChanged

2007-08 outlook: Who's improved thanks to offseason moves?

You must be registered for see images attach
By John Hollinger
ESPN Insider
(Archive)


• Coming Thursday: Hollinger's offseason losers
Improvement. That's the name of the game in the offseason, and it comes in all shapes and sizes. Teams can get better in a variety of ways -- through holdover players raising their games, through trimming dead wood from the previous season's roster, or by adding talent through the draft, trades or free agency. And sometimes, it doesn't even take any of that -- it just takes a different general on the sidelines pulling it all together.
But one thing remains constant: Standing pat is a formula for failure. In a business in which careers tend to be brief, it's imperative to constantly bring in new blood. Just ask the Miami Heat, who were so giddy about winning a championship in 2006 that they brought back the same roster last season -- and watched their aging crew fail to win a single playoff game in one of the weaker title defenses in league history.
Fortunately, half of the league's teams have made additions to their rosters that should prove quite helpful in the coming season, and that's the group I'll be discussing today. While not all of these moves were in the teams' best long-term interests ($24 million for Jason Kapono!?!?!?), what I want to do today is focus on how those maneuvers affect each team for this coming season in particular.
And if we're only looking at the upcoming season, even a fairly reckless move can have positive short-term effects.
With that as the background, here's a midsummer update showing the teams that have made themselves more formidable than they were a year ago and why:
(Major additions and subtractions are given in parentheses)


You must be registered for see images


1. Houston Rockets
(added Mike James, Luis Scola, Jackie Butler and Aaron Brooks; lost Juwan Howard and Vassilis Spanoulis; replaced Jeff Van Gundy with Rick Adelman)
While you're focusing on the San Antonio-Dallas-Phoenix triumvirate in the West, don't sleep on Houston. The Rockets have quietly put together a roster that could very well be the last team standing in that conference in 2008.
Start with the decision to replace Van Gundy with Adelman -- a change in direction that will likely make the team more up-tempo and offensive-minded. They'll miss Van Gundy's defensive genius, but given the offensive stagnation this club showed in 2006-07, it's not a bad trade.
Moreover, hiring Adelman was especially important in this case because it basically adds another player to the roster. Bonzi Wells bristled under Van Gundy after showing up out of shape, and hardly played last season. But he seems excited by being reunited with Adelman, who coached him to a strong campaign in Sacramento two years ago.
From there, add in two vastly underrated trades. The first one pilfered James from Minnesota for Howard, giving the Rockets a do-over on the disastrous James-for-Rafer Alston trade two years ago. The second nabbed Scola and Butler from San Antonio in return for Spanoulis.
Scola, a skilled Argentinian who has been one of the best players in Europe for the past half-decade, will make an immediate impact as a starting power forward. Butler, as a young center with strong scoring skills in the post, should energize a second unit that was bereft of offense last season.
In the big picture, the Rockets aggressively addressed their three main problems: stagant offense, point guard and power forward. Between the coaching change, the additions of James and first-round pick Aaron Brooks at the point, the pickups of Scola and Butler up front, and the de facto addition of Wells, this team suddenly looks loaded. At this point in the offseason, nobody has upgraded more than this club.



You must be registered for see images


2. Charlotte Bobcats
(added Jason Richardson and Jared Dudley; lost Brevin Knight; replaced Bernie Bickerstaff with Sam Vincent)</B>
While cynics will claim that frugal Bobcats owner Robert Johnson only signed off on the Richardson deal because he had to get over the minimum salary floor, there's no question that the deal addressed a huge weakness that has plagued the Cats throughout their existence.
Richardson is a reliable scorer and rebounder -- one that will help push rookie bust Adam Morrison out of the rotation if he struggles again -- and gives the Bobcats a much-needed go-to guy late in games. It also allows sharpshooter Matt Carroll to shift to a more suitable sixth man role, where his defensive shortcomings won't be so glaring. As a late first-rounder, Dudley could be surprisingly effective too -- don't be shocked if he's earning important minutes by season's end. Add it up and a playoff run doesn't seem far-fetched at all.



You must be registered for see images


3. Phoenix Suns
(added Grant Hill, Alando Tucker; lost James Jones)
The Suns sold one of their first-round draft picks (uh-gain) but they also used one to grab Tucker, a tweener who should be able to fill in a lot of the minutes played by Jones. But their big grab was Hill, who is as brittle as they come but still a star when he's healthy enough to go.
He should thrive in Phoenix's running game and take over Boris Diaw's role as the de facto point man when Steve Nash is out of the game. Plus, his willingness to sign on the cheap means the Suns might not be done maneuvering just yet. After four decades they're still looking for a title in the Valley of the Sun; Hill might be the guy to get them over the top.



You must be registered for see images


4. New York Knicks
(added Zach Randolph, Wilson Chandler, Dan Dickau and Fred Jones; lost Steve Francis and Channing Frye)
I'd rank this higher if I had any faith in the ability of Curry and Randolph to defend with even a smidgen of enthusiasm or competence, but I don't. The two will combine to give the Knicks the league's most defensively disinterested frontcourt, and that should put them in the bottom five or so in defensive efficiency.
But offensively, the Knicks might be good enough to play .500 ball anyway. Randolph is a beast in the post, and he can play the high post and float in his feathery left-handed jumper if he needs to clear the lane for Curry. Adding Chandler, Dickau and Jones also helps in the depth department, especially if it gives Isiah Thomas the stones to finally cut Jerome James.
However, the Randolph deal didn't help the Knicks nearly as much as it did the rest of the league, who now can rejoice in several more years of expected luxury tax payments from Zeke's spendthrift regime.



You must be registered for see images


5. Atlanta Hawks
(added Al Horford, Acie Law)
Throw in two more lottery picks to a cast that already includes rising stars Joe Johnson and Josh Smith, and suddenly the Hawks look a lot more like a real basketball team. Horford was one of the top talents in an extremely strong draft, and at his size he'll probably be able to play some center -- a spot where the Hawks have been badly undermanned in the past.
I'm less bullish on Law's prospects, but he can't be any worse than the gang that manned the point for Atlanta last season. As with Charlotte, it's possible this team's lottery days are coming to an end. Too bad nobody will be in the stands to see it.



You must be registered for see images


6. Boston Celtics
(added Ray Allen; lost Wally Szczerbiak and Delonte West)
Long-term, I have grave doubts about whether this was the right move for Boston; as I've mentioned before, unless they're about to use Gerald Green and Theo Ratliff's expiring contract as bait to bring in another star, I hardly see the point of acquiring Allen.
But in the short-term, Allen will be a big upgrade on the Wally/West combo that manned a lot of the shooting guard minutes for Boston last season, and that should be enough to pull the C's out of the cellar in the Atlantic.



You must be registered for see images


7. Memphis Grizzlies
(added Mike Conley, Darko Milicic; lost Chucky Atkins; replaced Tony Barone with Marc Iavaroni)
The Grizzlies added two coveted young talents in Conley and Milicic, with the latter being hugely important because of the lack of a dependable frontcourt sidekick for Pau Gasol. Conley also figures to make an impact, but given his youth, it may come more in future seasons than the present.
Besides, he's filling some big shoes: Unbeknownst to many, Atkins played out of his mind a year ago. Conley will be hard-pressed just to match those numbers this season, let alone exceed them. But with these two additions, Grizz fans at least can see some light at the end of the tunnel.



You must be registered for see images


8. Washington Wizards
(added Nick Young, Oleksiy Pecherov; likely to add Juan Carlos Navarro)
Can it be? Do the Wizards finally have a bench? Adding three young players to the mix (their last two first-round picks plus whomever they trade Navarro for) certainly makes last season's fatally feeble second unit seem much more imposing for this go-round.
As those who read my draft preview know, I'm hugely skeptical of Young. But if all he has to do is improve upon Roger Mason Jr., I'm guessing he can handle that. Similarly, Pecherov is something of a mystery meat, but he can't be any worse than Jarvis Hayes was last year. And Navarro will be a solid No. 3 guard wherever he ends up, though right now the Wizards seem intent on a trade.



You must be registered for see images


9. New Orleans Hornets
(added Morris Peterson, Julian Wright)
The Hornets filled their hole at the wings with free agent Peterson and first-rounder Wright, who should be a big upgrade on the Rasual Butler/Desmond Mason combo that filled the slot a year ago.

Peterson gives the team a legit perimeter threat, something it lacked a year ago once Peja Stojakovic went on the shelf, while Wright's all-around game should provide a nice complement off the bench. Between those two and Peja's return, the Hornets impotent offense of a year ago should be a thing of the past.

You must be registered for see images


10. Sacramento Kings
(added Spencer Hawes and Mikki Moore; replaced coach Eric Musselman with Reggie Theus)
I have no idea if Theus can coach or not, and I think Musselman could do a pretty good job in the right situation. But nobody doubts that the wheels were coming off by the end of last year and that a change would be for the better, so in this case the Mussleman-for-Theus swap should be for the better.
Moreover, the Kings addressed their horrid frontcourt by adding two centers in Hawes and Moore. Neither is going to be great, but right now the Kings will settle for "adequate," especially given the price they paid. These moves may not keep them out of the lottery, but it will at least help stop the bleeding.



You must be registered for see images


11. Los Angeles Lakers
(added Javaris Crittenton, Derek Fisher)
I'm not sure if this is enough to make Kobe rescind his trade demand, but it helps. The Lakers point guards were disastrous last season, so adding the veteran Fisher to take over for Smush Parker should pay immediate dividends (although the Lakers overpaid and will hate themselves for this two years from now, that's in the future -- remember, we're just looking at the impacts for 2007-08 today).
Crittenton was supposed to be a long-range pick, but he played well enough in summer league that folks may reconsider that position -- especially since at 6-foot-5, he has the size that Phil Jackson craves in the backcourt.



You must be registered for see images


12. Chicago Bulls
(added Joakim Noah and Joe Smith; lost P.J. Brown)
Maybe power forward isn't the weak spot on the roster anymore. Already possessing a promising stud at the position in Tyrus Thomas, the Bulls added the energy of Noah and the veteran smarts of Smith to their roster, shoring up a spot manned by a fading Brown last season. No, none of these guys can score in the post, which is where the Bulls really could use help, but they'll add another jolt of energy to the frontcourt. Plus, they give Chicago yet more assets to throw into a trade for the likes of Kevin Garnett or Pau Gasol.



You must be registered for see images


13. Toronto Raptors
(added Maceo Baston and Jason Kapono; lost Morris Peterson)
Kapono might not even be as good as Mo Pete, the man whose spot he takes at greater expense. But the big picture in Toronto is that they have three deadly shooters surrounding T.J. Ford and Chris Bosh, so defending the latter two on the pick-and-roll will be a pick-your-poison proposition. Additionally, the more important comparison was improving on Joey Graham -- who inexplicably became the starter last season after the team soured on Peterson -- and Kapono is more than up to that challenge.
In the meantime, don't sleep on Baston. The former Michigan star was a Euroleague stalwart for several years but didn't get a chance to show his goods in Indiana. That's likely to change in Toronto this year, where he'll provide an inexpensive source of frontcourt offense off the pine.



You must be registered for see images


14. Detroit Pistons
(added Rodney Stuckey and Arron Afflalo)
I'm not sold on Afflalo at all, but Stuckey looks like the real deal, and should give Detroit a second-unit guard who can actually score once in awhile. After watching Flip Murray and Lindsey Hunter hoist brick after brick the past two seasons, Pistons fans are going to think this guy is the second coming of Dave Bing.



You must be registered for see images

15. Philadelphia 76ers
(added Thaddeus Young and Jason Smith; lost Joe Smith)
The departed Joe Smith was one of the keys to the Sixers' strong second-half run last season, so losing him leaves a dent. On the other hand, they added two first-round picks in Young and Jason Smith, and my guess is the contributions of those two will offset what has been lost.
Not that you'll see much difference in the win column -- I suspect the Sixers will be terrible -- but these moves didn't make the news any worse. Given some of the previous offseason maneuvers by the Billy King regime, that's a victory in itself.
John Hollinger writes for ESPN Insider. To e-mail him, click here.
 

Bufalay

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
4,679
Reaction score
786
Hollinger is the same fool that had chuck hayes rated as one of the top players in the league before last season started.
 
OP
OP
azirish

azirish

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Posts
3,876
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Please the Rockets aren't a threat to any of the Suns, Spurs, Mavs...this clown is nuts!

I think it is mostly a case of overrating the impact of Adelman, but it does seem pretty far fetched.
 

thegrahamcrackr

Registered User
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
6,168
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Az
I think it is mostly a case of overrating the impact of Adelman, but it does seem pretty far fetched.

Why is it far fetched? Yao missed 34 games last season and McGrady missed 11. They still finished with the 4th best record and 52 wins.

If the Rockets stay healthy, they should compete in the west. I don't think they will win it all, but I wouldn't be surprised at all to see them in the conference finals.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,319
Reaction score
68,312
Why is it far fetched? Yao missed 34 games last season and McGrady missed 11. They still finished with the 4th best record and 52 wins.

If the Rockets stay healthy, they should compete in the west. I don't think they will win it all, but I wouldn't be surprised at all to see them in the conference finals.

totally agree - they're deeper than they were last year and Adelemen has created two different Western Powers in two completely different eras - there's no reason to think he won't have an impact here as well. I think Van Gundy being gone will be addition by subtraction. He's not the right fit for the talent on that team.
 

Rab

Angry Vedder
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Posts
1,539
Reaction score
225
Location
In My Tree
totally agree - they're deeper than they were last year and Adelemen has created two different Western Powers in two completely different eras - there's no reason to think he won't have an impact here as well. I think Van Gundy being gone will be addition by subtraction. He's not the right fit for the talent on that team.
Agreed, but I think the wildcard here is Bonzi Wells. He could add a completely different dimension to this team if he shapes up, and all indications are he will under his former coach. I still don't like their PG situation at all, and they have some questions at the 4, but this is going to be a good team. Yao keeps getting better, and if McGrady stays healthy, this will be his best team.
 
OP
OP
azirish

azirish

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Posts
3,876
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
I guess that I'm rating the Rockets by the team that played the Suns last season. The Rockets had a highly ranked defense, yet the Suns sliced them up.

The Suns averaged 105.5 ppg against a team that usually gave up 92.13 ppg; the Suns averaged 49.4% against a team that usually let teams shoot only 44.5% and shot 48.8% for three against a team that usually let teams shoot 35.1%.

In four games, the Suns won three and the Suns only loss was after the Suns had clinched. In the first three games (all wins), the Suns margin was 13.7 ppg and their only loss was by 3.

So maybe the Rockets are better than they looked against the Suns, but they seemed pretty slow.
 

Nasser22

Sec. 32: Go Devils!
Joined
May 5, 2006
Posts
4,134
Reaction score
0
Please the Rockets aren't a threat to any of the Suns, Spurs, Mavs...this clown is nuts!
If they ever get a good starting power forward they really will be. As of right now, no way. Oh, but not to us...I think they may beat one of the Texas teams if they get that power forward....MAYBE, but our style makes Yao useless most of the time so the Suns are a very tough match-up for them. It would take even more to beat us.

Suns did improve, but it was a small improvement.
 

fordronken

Registered User
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Posts
3,806
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles area
Why is it far fetched? Yao missed 34 games last season and McGrady missed 11. They still finished with the 4th best record and 52 wins.

If the Rockets stay healthy, they should compete in the west. I don't think they will win it all, but I wouldn't be surprised at all to see them in the conference finals.

If Yao Ming and Tracy McGrady are healthy next season, they'll have already run out of luck for the postseason. If they play 40 games together next year, I'll be extremely surprised.

Plus, Adelman is a terrible game coach and Yao can't play the Suns. So, unless the brackets match up extremely fortunately, I don't see them knocking anybody out. The only team I think they could beat is Dallas, but then they'd still either have to face Phoenix or San Antonio, who they can't beat.
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Why is it far fetched? Yao missed 34 games last season and McGrady missed 11. They still finished with the 4th best record and 52 wins.

If the Rockets stay healthy, they should compete in the west. I don't think they will win it all, but I wouldn't be surprised at all to see them in the conference finals.

That's a pretty big "if". Yao Ming has averaged about 50 games per season the last two years. Tracy McGrady did not miss that many games last year, but even when he's playing he's doing it injured half the time.

For some reason even if the Houston Rockets are healthy all year they just don't scare me like the San Antonio Spurs or even the Dallas Mavericks.

Joe
 

Treesquid PhD

Pardon my Engrish
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
4,844
Reaction score
105
Location
Gilbert
so the rockets are going to be a challanger based on Bonzi Wells and T-Mac? I can see Yao to a degree but Bonzi Wells and T-Mac haven't done crap in their careers in terms of winning. I don't even think T-Mac is all that personally, a tad over rated IMO. ZOMG T-mac scores 40 points on 67 shots!!!!!!!!!!! but he scored 15 in 8 seconds!!!!!
 
OP
OP
azirish

azirish

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Posts
3,876
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
T-Mac is a great talent, but he's not been healthy enough to know if he's able to carry a team in the playoffs.

IMHO, Yao is ill suited to play the Suns if Amare can hit short jumpers. His conditioning is not suited to running and he typically looks gassed after five or six minutes.
 
Top