2007 Cardinals: LB & DB Analysis and Team Needs

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,959
Reaction score
4,136
Location
annapolis, md
watson:

my main point was that dansby isn't one of the best in the league and until he is his physical attributes dont mean squat---potential is a french word for not very good

i am assuming you guys live in az and probably know more about these guys than me, but from what i have noticed dansby needs to work harder on his mental approach and committment to the game. lemme know if i am wrong
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
i am assuming you guys live in az and probably know more about these guys than me, but from what i have noticed dansby needs to work harder on his mental approach and committment to the game. lemme know if i am wrong

I am right with you.

Until he puts in the effort in the offseason (that negative has been on him since his days in college) he will never make the pro bowl. Which is what is so frustrating about him as if he tried in the offseason he could be the best LB in the league or at the least a multiple pro bowler.
 

BigWatson

Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Posts
176
Reaction score
0
how about bart scott, adalius thomas, and ray lewis? you didnt comment on peterson, you are absolutely right about lavar and you should watch more of the chargers, cause merriman is an animal

and urlacher is faster than dansby check it out
he's not. he wasnt even 5 years ago when he was smaller and younger so how is he supposed to be faster than dansby right now with all the bulk he added? as for peterson: the 49ers let him go because he lost a step (knee injuries etc). bart scott is a beast but hes not 4.5 fast nor can he cover receivers man to man. ray lewis is old, slow and not as physical as he once was. adalius thomas is a freak though

btw i am watching the chargers, thats why i said merriman is like the worst cover LB in the nfl. he's absolutely worthless in coverage.
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,959
Reaction score
4,136
Location
annapolis, md
he's not. he wasnt even 5 years ago when he was smaller and younger so how is he supposed to be faster than dansby right now with all the bulk he added? as for peterson: the 49ers let him go because he lost a step (knee injuries etc). bart scott is a beast but hes not 4.5 fast nor can he cover receivers man to man. ray lewis is old, slow and not as physical as he once was. adalius thomas is a freak though

btw i am watching the chargers, thats why i said merriman is like the worst cover LB in the nfl. he's absolutely worthless in coverage.
according to the bears, urlacher has not put one pound on since he was drafted. When drafted he was 6'4 and 258 and ran a 4.59. dansby is 6'3, ran a 4.56 and has put weight on the frame that was only 230 when he was drafted. and peterson is a monster
 

BigWatson

Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Posts
176
Reaction score
0
You must be registered for see images


You must be registered for see images



yep you're right, he hasnt changed a bit.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,851
Posts
5,403,451
Members
6,315
Latest member
SewingChick65
Top