2007 Cardinals: Press Conference Impressions

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
1. I have no problem with extending Rod Graves. The guy has class...he has done a very good job helping to build the talent base and sign the young core of the team to long-term contract extensions.

I was particularly impressed that when Michael Bidwill was singing Graves' praises, Graves almost interrupted MB to say that the credit deserves to be shared by the whole management team, including Dennis Green. That's class, my friends...and this kind of humbleness and modesty speaks volumes to Graves' character.

I was also very impressed with how Graves handled the question of "didn't you wish there could have been a stronger voice from management in approaching Green about his and the team's shortcomings?" Graves said something to the effect of..."there was a strong voice" and "there were plenty of disagreements"...but that management agreed to argue the points but then support each other in the decisions.

Interesting note: MB never referred to RG as the GM...or referred to any title...just that he was re-signed to remain on the team management staff...perhaps MB was not intending to be vague, but it's interesting that even when a reporter asked MB point blank about RG's role, MB remained vague.

As for the draft and free agency strategies, it was interesting to hear how RG, the scouts, DG and the coaches worked together to structure the draft board and the Top 100...and hear from RG that "it all worked out"...implying that the players high on their boards were there when the Cardinals were picking.

Also...interestingly...since their board was the Top 100...it's no stretch to say that the Cardinals have drafted much better on day ones than day twos...hopefully this year they will expand their list to the Top 200.

2. I think it's great that MB and RG are already working their search AND announcing the candidated they are interested in. Jaws and Ditka on ESPN News scoffed at the list saying that "it just shows the Cardinals don't know who they want"...but I totally disagree. There's no way the Cardinals can single out one candidate at this point because it's not a given they will be able to hire him.

The fact that RG and MB are being this aggressive and forthright so soon is a great sign, IMO.

3. The philosophy of hiring the candidate with the BEST PLAN...is very appealing. Obviously RG and MB are going to listen very carefully to what the candidates' plans are...in other words, these candidates better come to town prepared, with a knowledge of the personnel and the strengths and weaknesses of the recent coaching schemes and policies (why they did or didn't work).

4. As for the candidates...I like the list a lot. Riviera is appealing because of the mindset he would bring to the organization...he's a charismatic coach who has the passion and toughness to bring the best out of the Cardinal players. Messers Chow, Sherman and Caldwell are offensive gurus who can optimize the Cards' prodigious offensive talent...Sherman has HC experience too...and has had HCing success...the problem with him is that he's not a very popular coach...he's a disciplinarian and a fastidious attendant to detail...the Cards need discipline and attention to detail...the question is can they get it from a more player friendly coach?

The Wild Card here may be Jim Caldwell. Imagine our offense becoming Indy Southwest?! And Caldwell is certainly no stranger to Edgerrin James, whom I imagined put in a good word for Caldwell...just as Matt Leinart must have put in a good word for Norm Chow.

I think RG and MB may already have a top candidate in mind...and may have already spoken informally to that candidate, which is why they were able to announce the retention of several Cardinal assistant coaches (perhaps the leading candidate has already approved of keeping those coaches)...just a guess...because otherwise, as Russ pointed out, an intention to keep current assistants in place may be a serious deterrent for some or many of the candidates, who normally would want to bring in their own people.

However, one thing to note...just because the assistants were retained doesn't mean they necessarily would be retained in their current roles. Mike Kruczek may be switched back to QB coach, for example, if the new candidate has his own OC in mind.

The fact that most of the assistant coaches retained are defensive coaches...it makes me think that Norm Chow or Jim Caldwell is the leading candidate. I may be reading too much into that...but it would make sense for Chow and Caldwell seeing as neither of them have ever had to hire an NFL coaching staff.

And I think it's great that Steve Loney and Mike Kruczek are both on board...I think they turned in the best coaching performances on the staff this year.

All in all...I am very impressed with what transpired today.

It should be a very interesting few weeks.
 
Last edited:

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,982
Reaction score
26,487
You had me at "hello"...

You must be registered for see images
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
Mitch, Well put! I would be happy with any on the list. IMO they might add Carrol after todays game.

GBR
40
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,982
Reaction score
26,487
Mitch, I certainly hope you are right that they already have a coach lined up and that they already got his input on the assistants. I wouldn't bet on it, but I hope you are right. I said what I really wanted to see when they fired Green was an aggressive plan to replace him with a sure upgrade.
 

MrY

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Posts
476
Reaction score
0
You had me at "hello"...

You must be registered for see images

Aj, for some odd reason I seem to be enjoying your bitterness today. It seems as though you have captured my feelings about the whole mgt buffoonery and keystone cop routine perfectly
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Interesting note: MB never referred to RG as the GM...or referred to any title...just that he was re-signed to remain on the team management staff...perhaps MB was not intending to be vague, but it's interesting that even when a reporter asked MB point blank about RG's role, MB remained vague.

I dont think he was vague at all.

Mike stated, "he will have the final say on all football personnel decisions". That is the opposite of vague.

As someone in another thread stated, no matter what his title "Sounds like a GM to me!".
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,982
Reaction score
26,487
Aj, for some odd reason I seem to be enjoying your bitterness today. It seems as though you have captured my feelings about the whole mgt buffoonery and keystone cop routine perfectly

Being a sarcastic SOB is a character flaw of mine. But, the Cardinals give me an outlet to unload on besides my family. That's why I'll be a diehard fan until the end. No matter no how long it takes them to win the Super Bowl. (Which, I pretty much know when that will happen-- one year after my death.)
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
4,924
Reaction score
2,536
I dont think he was vague at all.

Mike stated, "he will have the final say on all football personnel decisions". That is the opposite of vague.

As someone in another thread stated, no matter what his title "Sounds like a GM to me!".

Seriously, is this any different to the decision making structure we have experinced in the last three years?
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
I think RG and MB may already have a top candidate in mind...and may have already spoken informally to that candidate, which is why they were able to announce the retention of several Cardinal assistant coaches (perhaps the leading candidate has already approved of keeping those coaches)...just a guess...

You might be right but I think it may be a big leap. There are coach hiring procedures that must be followed, including minoirty interviews. The poeple taht watch this process are watch dogs and see everything and you will be punished if one does not follow these hiring rules correctly. Detriot found out the hard way.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,982
Reaction score
26,487
Seriously, is this any different to the decision making structure we have experinced in the last three years?

Nobody thought Graves had the final say on personnel when Green was here. If he did, it was the best kept secret ever.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
I dont think he was vague at all.

Mike stated, "he will have the final say on all football personnel decisions". That is the opposite of vague.

As someone in another thread stated, no matter what his title "Sounds like a GM to me!".

OK, Joe...so is RG the Director of Player Personnel?
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
4,924
Reaction score
2,536
Nobody thought Graves had the final say on personnel when Green was here. If he did, it was the best kept secret ever.

So, it was Green then? That's what I'm trying to figure out here. I was always under the impression that the decisions were based on input from Green, Graves, Mike B etc and not one person.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
OK, Joe...so is RG the Director of Player Personnel?

Titles are just semantics. Graves is a GM or player personnel what ever you want to call it, same thing.

And what Mike stated, "he will have the final say on all football personnel decisions" is the exact definition of a GM.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
You might be right but I think it may be a big leap. There are coach hiring procedures that must be followed, including minoirty interviews. The poeple taht watch this process are watch dogs and see everything and you will be punished if one does not follow these hiring rules correctly. Detriot found out the hard way.

Joe...I don't think the Cardinals will have any problems with the minority issue...having just employed Dennis Green for three years and having just re-signed Rod Graves.

Also wouldn't Ron Riviera and Norm Chow be considered minority candidates? Certainly, Jim Caldwell, would be.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Titles are just semantics. Graves is a GM or player personnel what ever you want to call it, same thing.

And what Mike stated, "he will have the final say on all football personnel decisions" is the exact definition of a GM.

You just proved my point, Joe. You don't know RG's specific title...just his role.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,982
Reaction score
26,487
You just proved my point, Joe. You don't know RG's specific title...just his role.

What's more important --- the label on the bottle or what's in the bottle?

I don't care if they title him "Grand High Poobah", I'm concerned about what he's actually going to do.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
Joe...I don't think the Cardinals will have any problems with the minority issue...having just employed Dennis Green for three years and having just re-signed Rod Graves.

Also wouldn't Ron Riviera and Norm Chow be considered minority candidates?

I agree with the first part but you do have to formal interviews regardless.

Remember though the group that watches this stuff are detialed oriented watch dogs with eyes everywhere. Just becuase the Cards have a good reputation doesnt mean they will cut them slack. Those watch dogs are vicious trust me.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
You just proved my point, Joe. You don't know RG's specific title...just his role.

Whats your point? who cares what his title is, he is playing the role of the GM, period.

Once again it doesnt matter what his title is, he has the exact responsiblities that a GM is to have. Mike was not vague on that.

GM, player personell, howdy doody, its all the same in this management group.
 

ItsInTheCards

Bomb2Quan
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Posts
715
Reaction score
0
Location
Lake Mary, Florida
Joe...I don't think the Cardinals will have any problems with the minority issue...having just employed Dennis Green for three years and having just re-signed Rod Graves.

Also wouldn't Ron Riviera and Norm Chow be considered minority candidates?

Chow is chinese, Rivera is Puerto Rican, so they both satisfy the Rooney rule
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,278
Reaction score
5,441
Location
Nashville TN.
Seriously, is this any different to the decision making structure we have experinced in the last three years?

No, it really isn't and that is what scares me. I was laughing when Graves tried to share the credit for the personnel added here. For crying out loud we have been awful for how long. Only Detroit has more consecutive seasons with double digit losses.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
I agree with the first part but you do have to formal interviews regardless.

Remember though the group that watches this stuff are detialed oriented watch dogs with eyes everywhere. Just becuase the Cards have a good reputation doesnt mean they will cut them slack. Those watch dogs are vicious trust me.

You're right, Joe. The Cards will go through the process even if they have a great idea who their #1 candidate is.
 

Redsz

We do this together
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Posts
4,924
Reaction score
2,536
No, it really isn't and that is what scares me. I was laughing when Graves tried to share the credit for the personnel added here. For crying out loud we have been awful for how long. Only Detroit has more consecutive seasons with double digit losses.

That's what I'm really getting at here, though.

The decision making has somewhat remained the same (although I would argue that Mike and Rod have changed the way the Cardinals do business for the better).

Have the Cardinals record over the last three years been on Rod or the coaching staff? I would say the latter. And that's really what I'm more concerned about.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,537
Posts
5,436,590
Members
6,330
Latest member
Trainwreck20
Top