2015 Cap Situation

iRobot

Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2013
Posts
489
Reaction score
64
Location
Nashville, TN
With projected salary cap $144,250,620 per overthecap.com -- the Cardinals appear to sit at a -$6,847,875 OVER the cap projection.

How that can be fixed:

1) Larry Fitzgerald -- if he is designated a June 1st cut (unlikely since they wouldnt be able to use those dollars until after June 1st) -- the Cards are then $9M under the cap. More likely, he is given a new deal or trade/cut. If traded/cut -- the team is $2.3M under the cap.

2) Darnell Dockett -- He is a leader, unquestioned. However, his production even before injury had fallen a bit. He's been good against the run but his pass rushing productivity has been lacking. It would be nice if he took less money, but he may not. I wont speculate what his deal could be if he restructured or took less money, but if he's traded or cut... team saves $6.8M and is now $9.1M under the cap with the Fitz option above.

3) Daryl Washington -- A lot of commotion about what the team will do with DWash. Cutting or trading him would hit the cap for -$2M. Not likely with such little cap $ projected if any.. I think he stays.

4) Ted Ginn -- scheduled to make $4M ... he's a candidate to get cut. Cutting Ginn saves $2.5M and would put us at $11.6M under the cap.

5) Misc. savings -- there could be more. You save give or take $1M or so for making decisions on people like Lorenzo Alexander, Ted Larsen, John Carlson... so there could be more moves to help the situation.

Anyone who wants to play GM can do so, which is quite fun actually restructuring deals lol -- http://overthecap.com/calculator/arizona-cardinals/
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,612
Reaction score
30,325
Location
Gilbert, AZ
iRobot, as I understand it, the Cards can't avoid paying Fitzgerald the $8M roster bonus if they designate him a June 1 cut. They'd also have to carry the $24M cap number through June 1, when they'd suddenly open up $8M or more in cap room.
 
OP
OP
I

iRobot

Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2013
Posts
489
Reaction score
64
Location
Nashville, TN
iRobot, as I understand it, the Cards can't avoid paying Fitzgerald the $8M roster bonus if they designate him a June 1 cut. They'd also have to carry the $24M cap number through June 1, when they'd suddenly open up $8M or more in cap room.

Yea, that's 100% true. I didn't think of that aspect and I don't know if OverTheCap reflects that.

I wonder if making the decision to cut him before the roster bonus is due would allow them to not pay him the $8M roster bonus though as long as the decision is made regardless of June 1 or not.

I can see why it wouldn't since technically he doesn't come off the books until after June 1st.

The scenario I give for his $ though is with trade/cut.
 

BillsCarnage

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
5,827
Reaction score
1,197
Location
The Flip Side
iRobot, as I understand it, the Cards can't avoid paying Fitzgerald the $8M roster bonus if they designate him a June 1 cut. They'd also have to carry the $24M cap number through June 1, when they'd suddenly open up $8M or more in cap room.
Which is why, if he's going to get cut, it'll happen March 15th, I believe - the 5th day of the league new year. They need to decide by then if he's going to be on the roster and get the roster bonus.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,612
Reaction score
30,325
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Yea, that's 100% true. I didn't think of that aspect and I don't know if OverTheCap reflects that.

I wonder if making the decision to cut him before the roster bonus is due would allow them to not pay him the $8M roster bonus though as long as the decision is made regardless of June 1 or not.

I can see why it wouldn't since technically he doesn't come off the books until after June 1st.

The scenario I give for his $ though is with trade/cut.

The intention of the June 1 cut designation is to allow a team to get a player off the roster while still maintaining the cap flexibility that the June 1 designation carries. Conceptually and from a payment perspective, the contract remains in effect until June 1, when the cap accounting changes.

If the contract is in effect after the 5th day of the league year, you have to pay him the bonus and account for it. If you cut him before then, you don't have to pay the bonus, but you can't spread the remaining cap charge over 2 years.
 

BillsCarnage

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
5,827
Reaction score
1,197
Location
The Flip Side
I really believe Dockett will restructure and stay a few (2-3) more years.

DWash - I think he'll stay too. There's a lot of talk about the possible suspension for the DV case. But, that all occurred prior to the new policies and if Goodell tries to suspend him for more than 6gms the union will have a field day. I think he'll get 4gms, but don't be surprised if he manages to scoot by w/o a suspension with union support.

Ginn - I don't see any scenario he's back. Honestly, if he is I'll question the mental capacity of the FO.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
I really believe Dockett will restructure and stay a few (2-3) more years.

DWash - I think he'll stay too. There's a lot of talk about the possible suspension for the DV case. But, that all occurred prior to the new policies and if Goodell tries to suspend him for more than 6gms the union will have a field day. I think he'll get 4gms, but don't be surprised if he manages to scoot by w/o a suspension with union support.

Ginn - I don't see any scenario he's back. Honestly, if he is I'll question the mental capacity of the FO.

I think Dwash gets the new 6 game, appeals it and it goes down to 2-4 games.

Also think Dwash does a new deal full of escalators so he can make tons of money if he plays but doesnt get to steal money anymore.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,612
Reaction score
30,325
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I think Dwash gets the new 6 game, appeals it and it goes down to 2-4 games.

Also think Dwash does a new deal full of escalators so he can make tons of money if he plays but doesnt get to steal money anymore.

Why in the world would he do this? Because he's a good guy? I think our last two years' experience aptly illustrates that Daryl Washington is not a good guy.

The reality is that Washington's already gotten most of the money that he was going to get when the Cards paid his option bonus last March. His base salaries the next three years are relatively small.
 
OP
OP
I

iRobot

Veteran
Joined
May 28, 2013
Posts
489
Reaction score
64
Location
Nashville, TN
Why in the world would he do this? Because he's a good guy? I think our last two years' experience aptly illustrates that Daryl Washington is not a good guy.

The reality is that Washington's already gotten most of the money that he was going to get when the Cards paid his option bonus last March. His base salaries the next three years are relatively small.

This.. this.. this.

DWash will not be given any new deal until he shows good years with no issues. Even then, he's hurt any future deals he may get from this team at least.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,126
Reaction score
21,404
Location
South Bay
I really believe Dockett will restructure and stay a few (2-3) more years.

DWash - I think he'll stay too. There's a lot of talk about the possible suspension for the DV case. But, that all occurred prior to the new policies and if Goodell tries to suspend him for more than 6gms the union will have a field day. I think he'll get 4gms, but don't be surprised if he manages to scoot by w/o a suspension with union support.

Ginn - I don't see any scenario he's back. Honestly, if he is I'll question the mental capacity of the FO.

I HIGHLY doubt with the public scrutiny that Washington gets out of the DV suspension. I do, however, think he has a chance to get only 4 games based on the old DV policy, if the NFLPA successfully argues that his crime occurred during the old rules/regulations for personal conduct.
 

Ohcrap75

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Posts
1,270
Reaction score
723
Is there any money from 2014 cap that can be rolled over to this years?
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,612
Reaction score
30,325
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I'm trying to find out via twitter whether Stanton hit his $4M playing time incentive. If that's the case, it's going to go on his 2015 cap number, raising it to a little over $7.8M.

I don't know if they have to deal with Fitzgerald's contract before the start of the league year or not--that's when you have to be under the cap. It's possible that you can wait until you actually have to pay that bonus, which would give them a little bit of additional time. For all the good feelings about Fitzgerald's conversations with the Cards, they haven't started talking about money yet. We'll see where that ends up.

Another real key is to do something with Jerraud Powers. He has one year left on his deal at $4.25M in salary ($5.25M against the cap). He's only 27 years old, and he can play in this league. I wonder if the Cards might extend him as well, guaranteeing maybe $5M and reducing his cap number and locking him up for the long term.

The only other sources of relief are Ted Ginn, Jr. and Dockett. Fitz has the Cards' balls in a vise for another season. Good grief.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,824
Reaction score
14,840
Location
Chandler, Az
Another real key is to do something with Jerraud Powers. He has one year left on his deal at $4.25M in salary ($5.25M against the cap). He's only 27 years old, and he can play in this league. I wonder if the Cards might extend him as well, guaranteeing maybe $5M and reducing his cap number and locking him up for the long term.

Yeah Mitch brought this up in another thread and I hadn't thought about it. Extending Powers seems like a no brainer as he has performed well and is still in his prime. That move could easily free up a couple million this year. Plus it would keep an important piece of the defensive backfield on the team for a few more years.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,612
Reaction score
30,325
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Yeah Mitch brought this up in another thread and I hadn't thought about it. Extending Powers seems like a no brainer as he has performed well and is still in his prime. That move could easily free up a couple million this year. Plus it would keep an important piece of the defensive backfield on the team for a few more years.

Yeah. Powers is a great hedge against not finding a better corner in free agency at a discount. I know that Chopper doesn't think much of him, but I'm comfortable having him as a #2 because I think it gives Matheiu more opportunities to play his natural position in nickel packages.
 

jeeperaz

Rookie
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Posts
82
Reaction score
0
So what I take from all of this is we won't have the money to sign Tamba Hali.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,508
Reaction score
2,344
Location
ASFN
I am all for extending powers to reduce cap hit. He is solid.
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
3,571
Reaction score
7,411
Location
Orange County, CA
For all the good feelings about Fitzgerald's conversations with the Cards, they haven't started talking about money yet

Wait, what?! What the heck have they been discussing that led Jurecki to report that "There has been positive movement in BOTH parties regarding the @LarryFitzgerald situation."?

...dbs

Edit: Here's a reference to Somers saying just that: "No new deal is imminent, as the sides have not even discussed money."

Sheesh, that takes a lot of steam out of Jurecki's optimistic tweet.
 
Last edited:
Top