lol...
LT is DJ Humphries one way or another.
RT is a hole but one with options in both FA and the Draft
C - the Cardinals are more comfortable with Shipley than we are, but we still have Cole, Gaillard, FA and the draft. Similar to WR situation.
DE - Yes, but we have a pick in Allen that you don't want to invalidate on the roster and Gunter who we can re-sign. Another position that has options in FA and early in the draft.
ILB - a hole, but I don't think you need to spend big to fill it.
WR - Not a roster hole, but needs a #1 to upgrade the unit. Draft only.
OLB - Lots of mid range options in FA and rounds 2 - 4 in the draft can give depth.
###
My summary.
Needs - no roster options
RT
DE
OLB
ILB
S
Wants
#1 WR (draft only)
#1a CB (FA only)
C (better than Shipley/Cole/Gaillard)
LT - I don't agree with you about it being Humphries one way or the other. Too many factors. He could hold out if tagged, or if we don't tag him, decide to go elsewhere for a litany of reasons. Regardless of it being him or not him, we have to pay someone here, and it's a big chunk of our cap space.
RT - we agree on. Still gotta pay the guy. Chunk of cap space.
C - Shipley is not signed. We are actively working to extend him, according to reports, which means the ship has sailed on Mason Cole. Gaillard is a 6th round pick who should not be counted on. If either is the starter week one (barring an injury), I'll buy you a six pack of beer. Even if it's still Shipley, chunk of cap space.
DE - I'd be really amazed if day one we decided we're going to trot Kyle Allen out as a starter. In the rotation, yeah, but as the unquestioned starter? Nah. Or not sign anyone else but bringing back Gunter, essentially keeping this piss poor squad the same year over year. You have to admit we need to find players to play here. Either way, this represents... 1-2x, a chunk of cap space.
ILB - Again agreed, but... chunk of cap space.
WR - if we stand pat at this position, who do you think becomes the #2? Sure, we could draft Lamb or Jeudy, but counting on that as early as December seems odd. Even if it's done in the draft... chunk of cap space, and we won't be addressing the other positions listed.
OLB - we need way more than depth. No Suggs, no Cassius Marsh, absolutely no starting options. Chunk of cap space.
Which bring us to...
S - I am not arguing that competition or a veteran here is a bad idea, just that we have two young guys who have gotten a considerable amount of playing time and could be relied on to be starters. I don't see it as logical to go spend premiere money on a position where we actually have options, especially compared to the other openings, and at a position that each year shows veterans wildly available and struggling to sign anywhere. Paying a premium here really limits us elsewhere.