Stout said:I haven't watched Hustle and Flow (and I never will), so take this with a grain of salt. It does not appear to me to be anything near worthy of a nomination, though.
Rent it - its actually quite a good movie.
Stout said:I haven't watched Hustle and Flow (and I never will), so take this with a grain of salt. It does not appear to me to be anything near worthy of a nomination, though.
Chaplin said:I haven't seen it either, but I haven't heard one bad thing about it, and especially about Terence Howard.
Djaughe said:Rent it - its actually quite a good movie.
Stout said:But just because it's not bad, doesn't make it Oscar-worthy, right?
Chaplin said:I don't know, how can either of us make that call having not seen it? It's not like it's Wedding Crashers or anything... I AM curious as to why you won't see it, or why you don't think it's Oscar-worthy.
Stout said:Well, I really can't say it's not Oscar-worthy, having never seen it. I'm letting my bias get the best of me there. Why won't I see it? Doesn't sound interesting, isn't my kind of culture, and is, in fact, the kind of movie I usually despise. I feel no need to use my limited time to see it.
Djaughe said:Yer call - I was pretty skeptical myself when it was brought home.
But it turned out to be quite a nice surprise.
Shane H said:PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Philip Seymour Hoffman - CAPOTE
Terrence Howard - HUSTLE & FLOW SEEN IT
Heath Ledger - BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN
Joaquin Phoenix - WALK THE LINE SEEN IT
David Strathairn - GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK SEEN IT
WHile I agree with Phoenix. I can certainly say that Howard and Strathairn are not better choices than Crowe. I would really like to Capote.
Chaplin said:Because Wedding Crashers and Batman Begins weren't nominated for Best Picture.![]()
Shane H said:I agree it was a pretty good movie. I dont conside rit Oscar worthy though.
Chaplin said:It's not the movie that needs to be "Oscar worthy", it's the performance. Tombstone had an Oscar-worthy performance by Val Kilmer, but the film most definitely was not Oscar-worthy. So there is a difference.
The nomination of Howard isn't surprising when taking into consideration the hype it generated last summer. But it is surprising when taking into consideration the kind of film--which is Stout's beef with it, I suppose. Too much 8 Mile and Boyz N the Hood I suppose.
Chaplin said:It's not the movie that needs to be "Oscar worthy", it's the performance. Tombstone had an Oscar-worthy performance by Val Kilmer, but the film most definitely was not Oscar-worthy. So there is a difference.
The nomination of Howard isn't surprising when taking into consideration the hype it generated last summer. But it is surprising when taking into consideration the kind of film--which is Stout's beef with it, I suppose. Too much 8 Mile and Boyz N the Hood I suppose.
Shane H said:They may be. But teh fact that the ones I have mentioned and seen got the nod over Crowe stupifies me.
Linderbee said:I believe that Crowe's reputation as a jerk is definitely why he didn't get the nomination...which sucks if it is--I wish they could all leave personal feelings aside...
Chaplin said:To be fair, he shouldn't be such a jerk like he was that night. That's not good for anyone.
Pariah said:Cinderella Man is getting jobbed. IMO, that oughta be up for best picture.
Chaplin said:Now there's a reason to watch the Oscars...![]()
Dback Jon said:Brokeback was robbed - even supposedly "liberal" Hollywood is a bunch of frickin Homophobes who aren't comfortable with the two men in love.
Chaplin said:That is simply not true. It's the Academy--which is still populated by the "old guard", the same men who ran the industry back in the McCarthy era. They're still not used to that kind of subject matter.
Also, you have to admit, there is a certain chance that Brokeback was overhyped. I mean, that's all we've seen for the last 4 months.