He runs through scrubs in college. Wait until he meets the bigger, faster NFL guys who can actually tackle.
Maybe. I guess we will see. I would love to see Patrick Peterson try to tackle him one on one...and hes going to the HOF.
He runs through scrubs in college. Wait until he meets the bigger, faster NFL guys who can actually tackle.
Maybe. I guess we will see. I would love to see Patrick Peterson try to tackle him one on one...and hes going to the HOF.
He played in the Big 10. It’s not like he played at UMass.He runs through scrubs in college. Wait until he meets the bigger, faster NFL guys who can actually tackle.
I'm not sure we can use P2 as a barometer for NFL tackling
It's officially 4.33 but he doesn't look that quick on film. He's not slow, but he's no burner.
Most concerning is Andy Isabella's college tape is full of him burning people downfield. I don't see any of that in Moore's film.
Brit, were you the guy who said that RM was a body catcher and less athletic than AI?It's officially 4.33 but he doesn't look that quick on film. He's not slow, but he's no burner.
Most concerning is Andy Isabella's college tape is full of him burning people downfield. I don't see any of that in Moore's film.
Brit, were you the guy who said that RM was a body catcher and less athletic than AI?
Indeed, there's a lot of body catching on his tape. That may well be because he receives a lot of short balls, but never the less there's not a lot of film of him high pointing balls.
The athleticism thing I will withdrawn. That was a comment based on the NGS tweet someone posted that had Isabella 98 and Moore 92. Not sure how NGS worked that out as Moore beat Isabella in every test. By some distance.
Sorry, not trying to be a jerk but what is your point? You can overdevelop muscles no matter how tall you are. My point is how does squatting 600 pounds make him better than squatting say 315 - 400 pounds. Look at Saquan Barkley, he's has numerous leg injuries despite his impressive leg strength. You want range of motion and flexibility with joints and muscles, lifting really heavy weight restricts that.When you are only 5'7" you don't have to move the bar very far. Normally the worlds best squatters are the shorter guys.
Sorry, not trying to be a jerk but what is your point? You can overdevelop muscles no matter how tall you are. My point is how does squatting 600 pounds make him better than squatting say 315 - 400 pounds. Look at Saquan Barkley, he's has numerous leg injuries despite his impressive leg strength. You want range of motion and flexibility with joints and muscles, lifting really heavy weight restricts that.
He ran through Ohio state for 194 all purpose yards. Those guys are nfl players...He runs through scrubs in college. Wait until he meets the bigger, faster NFL guys who can actually tackle.
I'm sure he isn't taking roids but his game is predicated on speed due to his lack of height, the leg injuries he's suffered if not corrected as you say by NFL trainers toning him down will continue to hamper him.An NFL Trainer can easily tone his legs down if need be. What is more concerning are the twitchy guys with stick legs that have hammy issues. Squatting 600 lbs at 180 is ridiculous. I was on the powerlifting competition circuit for 5-6 years & that’s a feat. I started in the 181 class, so I can appreciate that. I thickened up & had to move to 202. An old college baseball injury (severe groin pull) prevented me from ever trying 600. There were roided guys who did more, but I only competed in the steroid free events when you actually got tested beforehand. I can look at the pics of Moore and tell you he never did steroids.
Don’t think he plays to his timed speed but he has more suddenness, balance, and strength to his game. Plenty of speed but likely not game SEE-YA! speed.It's officially 4.33 but he doesn't look that quick on film. He's not slow, but he's no burner.
Most concerning is Andy Isabella's college tape is full of him burning people downfield. I don't see any of that in Moore's film.
Like Patrick Peterson?He runs through scrubs in college. Wait until he meets the bigger, faster NFL guys who can actually tackle.
Lol. Beat me to it!Maybe. I guess we will see. I would love to see Patrick Peterson try to tackle him one on one...and hes going to the HOF.
Did they blur out the logo to protect the identity of the innocent?Grade
A
You must be registered for see images attach
Arizona Cardinals
Day 2 draft picks
- Purdue WR Rondale Moore (No. 49 overall)
Day 1 grade: A-
Analysis: I had Moore going to the Cardinals at No. 49 in my seven-round mock draft, adding some much-needed competition among the group of receivers (former second-rounders Christian Kirk, Andy Isabella) battling for targets opposite DeAndre Hopkins and A.J. Green. Moore will give the offense a boost if he can stay healthy. The Cardinals traded their third-round pick to the Raiders for center Rodney Hudson earlier this offseason. He’ll a big upgrade at that position.
Did they blur out the logo to protect the identity of the innocent?
Cardinals are hardly the only ones high on this guy. Read publications that said he could go in round 1. But, I don't see drafting a guy based in his play in 2018. Certainly not in round 2. Add to that he is short and now has a QB that misses high. I just don't understand this pick.
You can say this about every player that has ever been drafted...He runs through scrubs in college. Wait until he meets the bigger, faster NFL guys who can actually tackle.
Good point. Not every skill position has that many tools.You can say this about every player that has ever been drafted...
Every RB or WR ever had to eventually prove that his speed, quickness, elusiveness and tackle breaking will work against the bigger, stronger and more athletic NFL players.
The plus side for Moore over many other guys is that he showed an ability to beat tacklers in many different ways. Using strength, speed, quickness and elusiveness at different times to beat tacklers.