A Dilemma of Moore or Less

AZman5103

Hall of Famer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
1,673
Reaction score
1,767
Location
Idaho
He runs through scrubs in college. Wait until he meets the bigger, faster NFL guys who can actually tackle.

Maybe. I guess we will see. I would love to see Patrick Peterson try to tackle him one on one...and hes going to the HOF.
 

AZman5103

Hall of Famer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
1,673
Reaction score
1,767
Location
Idaho
I'm not sure we can use P2 as a barometer for NFL tackling

HAHA...I know. Im just saying...will he be able to run over everyone, of course not. Does he have the power and strength to run over an NFL guy who is a half hearted tackler....yes he sure does!

I like that trait. How about this quote from one of the A grades I read today:

"Over the past three seasons, Moore maintained or gained speed after contact on insides routes at the highest rate of any receiver in FBS. The ability to use Moore out of the backfield and in creative pre-snap alignments adds a great layer to the playbook."
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
It's officially 4.33 but he doesn't look that quick on film. He's not slow, but he's no burner.

Most concerning is Andy Isabella's college tape is full of him burning people downfield. I don't see any of that in Moore's film.

LOL who cares what it "looks" like. Rondale Moore was consistently clocked at 21 mph with gps devices. That's stupid fast.

He doubled up the rest of his team combined every game. He's fast.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,461
Reaction score
40,045
Location
Las Vegas
Grade
A
You must be registered for see images attach

Arizona Cardinals
Day 2 draft picks


Day 1 grade: A-


Analysis: I had Moore going to the Cardinals at No. 49 in my seven-round mock draft, adding some much-needed competition among the group of receivers (former second-rounders Christian Kirk, Andy Isabella) battling for targets opposite DeAndre Hopkins and A.J. Green. Moore will give the offense a boost if he can stay healthy. The Cardinals traded their third-round pick to the Raiders for center Rodney Hudson earlier this offseason. He’ll a big upgrade at that position.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
It's officially 4.33 but he doesn't look that quick on film. He's not slow, but he's no burner.

Most concerning is Andy Isabella's college tape is full of him burning people downfield. I don't see any of that in Moore's film.
Brit, were you the guy who said that RM was a body catcher and less athletic than AI?
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,795
Reaction score
41,642
Location
UK
Brit, were you the guy who said that RM was a body catcher and less athletic than AI?

Indeed, there's a lot of body catching on his tape. That may well be because he receives a lot of short balls, but never the less there's not a lot of film of him high pointing balls.

The athleticism thing I will withdrawn. That was a comment based on the NGS tweet someone posted that had Isabella 98 and Moore 92. Not sure how NGS worked that out as Moore beat Isabella in every test. By some distance.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,264
Reaction score
5,424
Location
Nashville TN.
Cardinals are hardly the only ones high on this guy. Read publications that said he could go in round 1. But, I don't see drafting a guy based in his play in 2018. Certainly not in round 2. Add to that he is short and now has a QB that misses high. I just don't understand this pick.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,136
Reaction score
39,722
Indeed, there's a lot of body catching on his tape. That may well be because he receives a lot of short balls, but never the less there's not a lot of film of him high pointing balls.

The athleticism thing I will withdrawn. That was a comment based on the NGS tweet someone posted that had Isabella 98 and Moore 92. Not sure how NGS worked that out as Moore beat Isabella in every test. By some distance.


Remember the tapes of Isabella beating guys in college were mostly guys who are nowhere near NFL rosters now. He had agreat game against Georgia and that's really what got Andy drafted so high, people said see that's an SEC team and he played great against them.

Moore was in the Big 10 so he was playing week after week against better talent. He had 12 for 170 and 2 TD's against TOSU as a freshman. The only SEC team they played was Auburn he had 11 for 93 no TD's in a loss. Soph year 13 for 220 against Vandy SEC but Vandy not Georgia or Bama of course.

If he's the Moore as a freshman we'll all be happy, if not we might not be but I'd be pretty surprised if he's inactive on game days when healthy like Andy has been several times over 2 years
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
When you are only 5'7" you don't have to move the bar very far. Normally the worlds best squatters are the shorter guys.
Sorry, not trying to be a jerk but what is your point? You can overdevelop muscles no matter how tall you are. My point is how does squatting 600 pounds make him better than squatting say 315 - 400 pounds. Look at Saquan Barkley, he's has numerous leg injuries despite his impressive leg strength. You want range of motion and flexibility with joints and muscles, lifting really heavy weight restricts that.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,795
Reaction score
41,642
Location
UK
Sorry, not trying to be a jerk but what is your point? You can overdevelop muscles no matter how tall you are. My point is how does squatting 600 pounds make him better than squatting say 315 - 400 pounds. Look at Saquan Barkley, he's has numerous leg injuries despite his impressive leg strength. You want range of motion and flexibility with joints and muscles, lifting really heavy weight restricts that.

My point is that squatting 600lbs when you are 6'4" is more impressive than when you're 5'7". It's impressive either way, just easier when you are short.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
An NFL Trainer can easily tone his legs down if need be. What is more concerning are the twitchy guys with stick legs that have hammy issues. Squatting 600 lbs at 180 is ridiculous. I was on the powerlifting competition circuit for 5-6 years & that’s a feat. I started in the 181 class, so I can appreciate that. I thickened up & had to move to 202. An old college baseball injury (severe groin pull) prevented me from ever trying 600. There were roided guys who did more, but I only competed in the steroid free events when you actually got tested beforehand. I can look at the pics of Moore and tell you he never did steroids.
I'm sure he isn't taking roids but his game is predicated on speed due to his lack of height, the leg injuries he's suffered if not corrected as you say by NFL trainers toning him down will continue to hamper him.

Like you, weightlifting is a justification for being able to lift that much weight but playing football requires you to be able to move fast especially if you're playing WR.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,096
Reaction score
59,052
Location
SoCal
It's officially 4.33 but he doesn't look that quick on film. He's not slow, but he's no burner.

Most concerning is Andy Isabella's college tape is full of him burning people downfield. I don't see any of that in Moore's film.
Don’t think he plays to his timed speed but he has more suddenness, balance, and strength to his game. Plenty of speed but likely not game SEE-YA! speed.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,096
Reaction score
59,052
Location
SoCal
Grade
A
You must be registered for see images attach

Arizona Cardinals
Day 2 draft picks


Day 1 grade: A-


Analysis: I had Moore going to the Cardinals at No. 49 in my seven-round mock draft, adding some much-needed competition among the group of receivers (former second-rounders Christian Kirk, Andy Isabella) battling for targets opposite DeAndre Hopkins and A.J. Green. Moore will give the offense a boost if he can stay healthy. The Cardinals traded their third-round pick to the Raiders for center Rodney Hudson earlier this offseason. He’ll a big upgrade at that position.
Did they blur out the logo to protect the identity of the innocent?
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,948
Reaction score
8,386
Location
North of the 49th.
Cardinals are hardly the only ones high on this guy. Read publications that said he could go in round 1. But, I don't see drafting a guy based in his play in 2018. Certainly not in round 2. Add to that he is short and now has a QB that misses high. I just don't understand this pick.

Not worried about KM hitting him given the number of times Isabella dropped balls that HIT him in the chest.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,136
Reaction score
39,722
If I wanted to nitpick the pick I'd point out other than screens most of the passes you see Moore catch and do damage with are passes where he's going over the middle, and that's where Kyler has struggled the most so far. But maybe that's the point, get a guy who can really do damage over the middle? I love Fitz too but when he catches the ball over the middle now he looks for someone to run into, goes down and then sprints over and hands the ball to the ref, he just doesn't have any twitch left to do anything after the catch.

We knew we needed a YAC receiver, Waddle was gone, Moore and Atwell were the most likely guys when we picked and Atwell makes Moore look huge.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,190
Reaction score
6,664
He runs through scrubs in college. Wait until he meets the bigger, faster NFL guys who can actually tackle.
You can say this about every player that has ever been drafted...

Every RB or WR ever had to eventually prove that his speed, quickness, elusiveness and tackle breaking will work against the bigger, stronger and more athletic NFL players.

The plus side for Moore over many other guys is that he showed an ability to beat tacklers in many different ways. Using strength, speed, quickness and elusiveness at different times to beat tacklers.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,096
Reaction score
59,052
Location
SoCal
You can say this about every player that has ever been drafted...

Every RB or WR ever had to eventually prove that his speed, quickness, elusiveness and tackle breaking will work against the bigger, stronger and more athletic NFL players.

The plus side for Moore over many other guys is that he showed an ability to beat tacklers in many different ways. Using strength, speed, quickness and elusiveness at different times to beat tacklers.
Good point. Not every skill position has that many tools.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,107
Posts
5,433,280
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top