Not hardly. Don't make me get into THAT discussion. You said you could kick my ass...you started it.Well you just hauled off and started fingernailing me without warning.. We werent in a discussion about marks.. You went Kujo on me..
Not hardly. Don't make me get into THAT discussion. You said you could kick my ass...you started it.Well you just hauled off and started fingernailing me without warning.. We werent in a discussion about marks.. You went Kujo on me..
ONE mark on your arm....ONE.Marks are not scars, intentional clawer.
Not until now...
Puhleeeeeze. It was four fingernails.
ONE mark on your arm....ONE.
Not hardly. Don't make me get into THAT discussion. You said you could kick my ass...you started it.
Yes, like your wife's. I believe she said, "Well, good for her." Is that incorrect?Yes, one mark. The leftover from a bleeding wound the likes of which almost required amputation.
When referencing this event in question, how about we rely on the person whose memory actually hasn't got any holes from the evening, shall we?
oooh:
:zing:
uch:
:yowza:
Oh, I was smiling, too. You said that I couldn't hurt you. Given the amount of complaining you have done since, I would say I proved you wrong. So there.Well I can.. And I was smiling.. Wasnt like a fight was ever gonna happen.. You just went Freddy Kruger on me for no reason..
You TOLD me to bring it, (warning given) and Donald was smoking like he wasn't supposed to be, (cause shown).So what Donald and me has proven in this thread is that Linder is a repeat offender with her nails.. She strikes without warning and no cause..
Case closed..
Yes, like your wife's. I believe she said, "Well, good for her." Is that incorrect?
Just because a good 15% of the night is completely obliterated from my memory does not mean that...
...well, I don't know what it means, but you're still being a total pansy!
Oh, I was smiling, too. You said that I couldn't hurt you. Given the amount of complaining you have done since, I would say I proved you wrong. So there.
You TOLD me to bring it, (warning given) and Donald was smoking like he wasn't supposed to be, (cause shown).
INNOCENT. Case REALLY closed.
I believe she said, "Well, good for her." Is that incorrect?
...well, I don't know what it means, but you're still totally awesome and completely right.
your memory is WHACKED.I never said for you to bring it.. Nope, I never did.. I was just standing there them you lundged at me and like a piranna, started chomping away at my arm..
well, I'll go with the totally awesome, but you're definitely wrong in some sort of fashion somehow. Maybe.
Thanks!
your memory is WHACKED.
big freakin' wuss punk.
well, I'll go with the totally awesome, but you're definitely wrong in some sort of fashion somehow. Maybe.
You'll notice my hesitation in calling Donald wrong. I've actually apologized repeatedly for that incident. My only defense there was I was pretty drunk at the time (hammered came a little bit later in the evening).I dont get it.. Its two against one here.. Two people with complete seperate incidents that before today had no prior knowledge of the others incident and we are both disputing your claims yet we are wrong? I dont think so..
You'll notice my hesitation in calling Donald wrong. I've actually apologized repeatedly for that incident. My only defense there was I was pretty drunk at the time (hammered came a little bit later in the evening).
YOUR incident--I was sober--YOU were drinking & apparently are suffering from alcohol-induced memory loss. So there. neener-neener.
I didn't say I wasn't drinking. I said I was sober. 2 beers does not equal even a buzz.You were drinking.. Dont lie.. I seem to recall your break out because of beer..
I didn't say I wasn't drinking. I said I was sober. 2 beers does not equal even a buzz.
:roll: You'd be the expert. I concede.Every drunk person thinks they are sober.. Once you drink an alchohilc beverage you judgement is skewed.. I rest my case..
:roll: You'd be the expert. I concede.