red desert
ASFN Addict
is...
The Chosen One.
Just want to go on the record with that thought.
The Chosen One.
Just want to go on the record with that thought.
is...
The Chosen One.
Just want to go on the record with that thought.
There are plenty of better running back prospects. Reggie Bush last year was better, and Darren McFadden next year will be better too. It's not as if he's a once in a decade player.
I don't know. AD was a beast in both high school and college. you might as well throw out h.s. because he was men amongst boys. In college he was very impressive as well. I think he is a better rb than bush is. I like mcfadden, but would like to see more of him. I'd rather have j.j. arrington than hart.I totally agree. Peterson will not duplicate his college and HS success with our O-line. Heck his HS line is probably better than our O-line last year. We have to upgrade our line, so if Thomas is there you take him if not trade down and pick either Levi Brown or Joe Staley not Patrick Willis or Derelle Revis. We can get a LB in the 2nd, DE in the 3rd and add O-line and secondary depth with 4, 5 , and 7 we will be set.
Next year we have McFadden, Hart, Forsett, Slaton, and James Davis coming out and I would be happy with any of those 5.
The year after that PJ Hill, Jonathan Stewart, CJ Gable, and CJ Spiller.
I agree 100%. I would rather trade up and get McFadden next year anyhow. I feel he is way better than Peterson.There are plenty of better running back prospects. Reggie Bush last year was better, and Darren McFadden next year will be better too. It's not as if he's a once in a decade player.
we'll see who's better. I don't see why the cards would feel that they have to have AD. I don't know that i've seen enough from mcfadden to say that he is way better......much less better. But waiting another year and trading up doesn't make sense for the cards. unless they have another high pick.I agree 100%. I would rather trade up and get McFadden next year anyhow. I feel he is way better than Peterson.
is...
The Chosen One.
Just want to go on the record with that thought.
Red Desert: What is your mock draft for the Cardinals? Looking forward to it, man.
I totally agree. Peterson will not duplicate his college and HS success with our O-line. Heck his HS line is probably better than our O-line last year. We have to upgrade our line, so if Thomas is there you take him if not trade down and pick either Levi Brown or Joe Staley not Patrick Willis or Derelle Revis. We can get a LB in the 2nd, DE in the 3rd and add O-line and secondary depth with 4, 5 , and 7 we will be set.
Next year we have McFadden, Hart, Forsett, Slaton, and James Davis coming out and I would be happy with any of those 5.
The year after that PJ Hill, Jonathan Stewart, CJ Gable, and CJ Spiller.
First four selections of a mock I'm involved in were Russell, C Johnson, Joe Thomas and Gaines Adams.
Still on my Board: Peterson, Quinn, L Brown, Willis, Nelson, Landry, Ginn, Revis. I couldn't find anyone willing to trade up with us.
So OK - Given that hand we've been dealt, what would you personally do?
My guess is that most of you reading this thread would leap all over Peterson. I didn't. Reason - I'm nervous about his injury history. His upright running style makes him a big target to take too many major league hits. And if we didn't draft him, we wouldn't die.
Instead, I bit the bullet and drafted Levi Brown. My rationale: The other aforementioned guys still on our Board (including Brown) are all fairly equal in talent (although some may rank slightly higher than others, for all intents & purposes, they're all close to dead-even as prospects).
And, although Thomas represents a safer "more ready" pick than Brown, I think Brown is physically more talented and also a better run blocker than Thomas and, therefore, a better fit for us over on Leinart's non blind side at LT.
As I've stated in earlier threads, I believe the Cardinals painted themselves in a corner by not addressing weakness and lack of depth on their O-line before the draft and now must do so with a selection in either Round One or Two. If we were to pass on Brown, we'd have to hope and pray that Staley or Blalock would be there when we picked at #38 and that would be a huge "if." If we were to fail here, I believe our entire 2007 season would be in jeopardy.
Therefore - assuming that's how the draft were to fall - if I were to stack my board in terms of "Player Who Can Help Us Most", Levi Brown would be my guy at #5 if we had to stand pat.
I remember the same thing said about a running back coming out of SMU in the late 70's. He's now in the Hall of Fame. (Eric Dickerson)
My thinking is clouded by optimism. I am thinking we won't be drafting top 10 next year. As an Arkie, I love McFadden. But, he is also a top 5 guy. I hope we are not in a postion to draft him. AP, hopefully, is our last chance to draft a franchise (top 5 pick) RB.There are plenty of better running back prospects. Reggie Bush last year was better, and Darren McFadden next year will be better too. It's not as if he's a once in a decade player.
good thinking.My thinking is clouded by optimism. I am thinking we won't be drafting top 10 next year. As an Arkie, I love McFadden. But, he is also a top 5 guy. I hope we are not in a postion to draft him. AP, hopefully, is our last chance to draft a franchise (top 5 pick) RB.
sometimes you just have to believe your eyes. People always overthink the draft......at least the fans and media. probly the coaches and gm's as well. all of the great backs were great in h.s. and college as well. For some reason when guys go up to get drafted, people start saying they are too small, too tall, too strong, not strong enough, too dumb, not dumb enough, ect. why did chris weinke when the heisman that year? because LT played at TCU. LT went to a small school in texas, but the guy was like m.j. playing against kids. Marshall Faulk went to SD state....not exactly OU or USC type competition. Emmitt was too small and slow, but 18,000 yards later........ Adrian Peterson was a freak in small palestine, texas. He went straight to OU and never missed a beat. sometimes you just have to believe your eyes. Did he get hurt? Yeah. OU also used him like he was the only rb in their arsenal so he did hold up in games where he got a lot of carries. One thing to point out is that he also seemed to get stronger as games went on. This day and age in the nfl.....with the speed and size of the avg defense.....AD will not have to carry the ball 30 times a game anyway. so maybe that will help him.That's right.
I understand why folks have concerns over AP's durability, to a degree.
I also understood why folks had concerns about Bush's durability, to a degree.
And why some had concerns about Barry Sanders durability, to a degree.
Likewise, I understood why folks had concerns about Thurman Thomas durability - to a degree.
There were similar concerns about Marshall Faulk. And why did LT drop to the number five pick? As I recall it was mostly because of the level of his competition, but there were also concerns about his durability.
Bottom line: AP will is going to Canton.
My thinking is clouded by optimism. I am thinking we won't be drafting top 10 next year. As an Arkie, I love McFadden. But, he is also a top 5 guy. I hope we are not in a postion to draft him. AP, hopefully, is our last chance to draft a franchise (top 5 pick) RB.
what about TD? you could also draft a marion barber type in the 5th round. what's the verdict with jj arrington. Are the cards done with him?We can create franchise backs with a good offensive line though. Whis did it last year with Willie Parker (UDFA), and plenty of teams have gotten by without top five running backs. Guys like Joseph Addai, Lawrence Maroney, Maurice Jones-Drew, etc. all proved themselves as quality backs and were drafted late in round one or round two.