They one fair and square .Well, won't be watching this Super Bowl. Just as I didn't watch last year's. I hope Philly wins but it feels like the NFL wants their new Golden Boy to get the 3-peat and I don't want to watch that.
What's a ...premier...league?unless its Americans rooting for premier league teams.
AZJ…exactly. I skipped last year’s SB and hardly watched the previous year’s game. The NFL really doesn’t have nearly the appeal to me that it did years ago. I won’t be watching again this year.Well, won't be watching this Super Bowl. Just as I didn't watch last year's. I hope Philly wins but it feels like the NFL wants their new Golden Boy to get the 3-peat and I don't want to watch that.
when the play was live it looked like a prayer. but damn on the replay he was open and should have comeback to make the catch. would have been a tougher catch than Andrews had to make, but one that kids made on the playground all the time. in fact a lot of DB's make int's like that all the time.Kincaid will sleep as well as Andrews did last week.
they really need to use technology to determine forward progress. I thought he got it, but it was close and difficult to overturn. what is odd is neither ref agreed with the spot.
I'm not sure about the Kenyan Drake play. But I think you made a good point about what Romo and Nance pointed out about the refs. the ref on one side was spotting it short. he was the one who Allen had his back turned on. the ref on the other side looked like he was spotting the ball farther forward but gave way to the other ref. my question is what did that ref see that the other one did not and why didn't he speak up. it makes them look incompetent and definitely fuels debates.I hate to agree with Romo but as he said if you watch the ref where he lined up was a first, then he walked over and spotted the ball short of the first. It was hard to be exact because Allen's back was turned much of the play but I thought he had it.
There was a play for us years ago forget the RB but they called him short of the endzone. The replay you could see his feet, his torso etc and his head, but you couldn't see the ball. Based on simply knowing how tall he was it was obvious the ball had crossed for a TD, but the refs said they couldn't overturn it because they couldn't see the ball. It was like the only way the ball didn't cross is if it was between his legs and it wasn't. I think it was Kenyan Drake?
I don't disagree with this take at all. I already said that I thought it was an interception. Having said that, if 'tie' goes to the offensive team, and they called it a catch for the offense, there is little to overturn it.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Adam Schein said it was "Bring your ref to work day" in KC
Except that the ball hit the ground, but the ball didn't move at all as part of hitting the ground. The ball is allowed to hit the ground if they believe possession was achieved beforehand, which I think it was...On the Worthy "catch" I'm watching it on my laptop. 2 of the people who work for Lucy's mom are there, both Filipinas that have never really watched American football. One of them asked what was going on and I explained they were reviewing if the ball was caught or not and she said "can it hit the ground?" I mean someone who's never even watched the game immediately grasped why it wasn't a catch, he used the ground to get control.
the way these NFL players are flopping these days IDK...What's a ...premier...league?
Americans would never root for something like that
Except that the ball hit the ground, but the ball didn't move at all as part of hitting the ground. The ball is allowed to hit the ground if they believe possession was achieved beforehand, which I think it was...
Whether it was or it wasn’t, it was very poorly handled by the zebras. And this, yet again, damages the league’s credibility. Especially in an era when the NFL essentially promotes wagering on its games.You must be registered for see images attachYou must be registered for see images attach