Aldridge: Nash 6yrs/66M$

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
1st 8.8M$
2nd 9.68M$
3rd 10.56M$
4th 11.44M$
5th 12.32M$
6th 13.2M$

= 6yrs/66.0M$

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1833603

If you add that to our to our payroll according to hoopshype we should be at 36,801,083$ now with the cap expected to be at 45-46M$ we should have about 9M$ left minus caphold penalties.

Maybe enough to sign Richardson to a rich offer sheet, Ostertag of Foyle for about 2M$ and McDyess hopefully for the veteran minimum for this season.

McDyess strongest options were Houston and New Jersey. New Jersey is in salary cut mode and Houston is shopping their MLE of Brent Barry or Derek Fisher it looks like.

McDyess/Ostertag/Voshkul
Amare/Lampe
Marion/Zarko
Johnson/Richardson/Jacobsen
Nash/Barbosa

IR: Eisley, Vroman
 
Last edited:

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
24,075
Reaction score
13,743
Location
Laveen, AZ
That makes me feel a little better about the contract issue with Nash. I aam not so worried about the back end of his contract due to recent history on point gurads with this team and their short tenures! :) I was more concerned he was eating up ALL our cap space this season, thus not being able to upgrade the center position.
 
OP
OP
slinslin

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Maybe Brent Barry and Folye or Ostertag would be more realistic since Barry is UFA and the market price has been set already by the Rockets and Barry.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,904
Reaction score
10,582
Location
L.A. area
:thumbup: I hope those numbers are right. Of course, since it's Aldridge, they're just as likely to be wrong, but I'll stay optimistic for now.

Other guesses at the contract started at $10 or even $10.8 million. The extra million or two might make a big difference before the summer is out. I'm much happier about the signing now.

(Note to the administrators: We need a "whew" smiley!)

Now let's go get Etan Thomas or Foyle!
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,539
Reaction score
2,403
Location
ASFN
much better than first thought...


I would much rather get Berry that Richardson.

Add Dice, and any one of the three centers above(Ostertag,Thomas,Foyle). And this off season was a major success!
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,539
Reaction score
2,403
Location
ASFN
I have also heared the 6th year is a TEAM option... But I dont know is that is a fact or not...
 

Chris_Sanders

Arizona Sports Simp
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
41,211
Reaction score
33,825
Location
Scottsdale, Az
BEERZ said:
I have also heared the 6th year is a TEAM option... But I dont know is that is a fact or not...

Yeah it has a big buyout.

This contract actually makes Nash a great pickup. My one complaint just vanished.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,539
Reaction score
2,403
Location
ASFN
Chris_Sanders said:
Yeah it has a big buyout.

This contract actually makes Nash a great pickup. My one complaint just vanished.
Although I was willing to bite the bullet of overpaying him, because he is the perfect PG for this team. I was worried about how big the contract looked.

This seems to be much more friendly. :thumbup:
 

sly fly

Devil Me This
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
2,469
Reaction score
0
Location
N. Phx
Wow. Talk about everyone jumping the gun.

Everyone's panties were in such a tither. :p
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,904
Reaction score
10,582
Location
L.A. area
Wow. Talk about everyone jumping the gun.

Everyone's panties were in such a tither.


Hey, all we can do is react to the information we have. :shrug:
 

sly fly

Devil Me This
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
2,469
Reaction score
0
Location
N. Phx
elindholm said:
Wow. Talk about everyone jumping the gun.

Everyone's panties were in such a tither.


Hey, all we can do is react to the information we have. :shrug:

Still, funny. :D
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
It's only a difference of about $5m from the previous assumption of $10/$11/$12/$13/$14/$5m, but for some reason it seems more manageable. :)


If the Suns think they have $7.5m in cap space left, that suggests that they expect the cap to be slightly more than $44m.


If Aldridge is right, I'm now surprised a little that Ginobili cancelled his visit with the Suns. He must be awfully confident that his demands will be met elsewhere...
 

sly fly

Devil Me This
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
2,469
Reaction score
0
Location
N. Phx
I guess that's why I tend to judge on the player instead of the money issues.

Never been one to care for that side of the game.

Get the best players you can. Hope they have chemistry. And, let the owner worry about the money.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,904
Reaction score
10,582
Location
L.A. area
I guess that's why I tend to judge on the player instead of the money issues.

Come on, sly fly, it is a personnel issue. The amount they spend on Nash determines how much they have left, which determines how much additional talent they can bring in. It's all about fielding the best possible team.

If the salary-cap implications for the rest of this summer weren't so critical, I wouldn't care whether it was $8.8 or $10 million.
 

sly fly

Devil Me This
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
2,469
Reaction score
0
Location
N. Phx
elindholm said:
I guess that's why I tend to judge on the player instead of the money issues.

Come on, sly fly, it is a personnel issue. The amount they spend on Nash determines how much they have left, which determines how much additional talent they can bring in. It's all about fielding the best possible team.

If the salary-cap implications for the rest of this summer weren't so critical, I wouldn't care whether it was $8.8 or $10 million.

I understand that. But, I still react differently when a player I like gets signed. I don't get into the money issues, because:

- I don't know what's going on within the organization. No one here does. I put my trust in them to try and make the best decisions.

It always doesn't turn out that way, but we're lucky we have a team that tries to improve when they have the flexibility to do so.

A perfect example of this is Steve Nash. I liked the signing from Day 1. Heck, I liked him when he was playing for Santa Clara and crushing the UofA on national TV.

Nash being signed for $8.8 or $10.8 mil is not going to change my mind about having him on this team.

If it adversely affects their payroll, oh well. I guess we have to live with the ramifications down the road. But, at least we know that by him being on this team now ... it takes us one step back to being a powerhouse in the Western Conference.

I'll leave the # crunching to all of you capmeisters. :D :p ;) :)
 

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
I think you can forget about the suns signing another guard, p or 2g.

They have Nash, JJ, CJ, Barbosa, Eisley, with Nash & JJ getting major minutes.

They have Marion, CJ, JJ, & Zarko, to play sf, so why would they want Richardson?

They will try to sign a big man or save the money and make a trade with another team, (to go big) or get in on a 3 team trade to get someone where they can take back some salary to make the deal work.

:)
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,904
Reaction score
10,582
Location
L.A. area
I understand that. But, I still react differently when a player I like gets signed. I don't get into the money issues, because:

- I don't know what's going on within the organization. No one here does.


True, and in general I'd agree with your stance. In this case, nearly all of us are assuming that the Suns will use basically all of their cap space, one way or another, before the season starts. We know that can't spend anything more than that, except for minimum contracts.

Our guess may prove to be wrong: the Suns may not add anyone else, or they might add a lesser player and leave some money left over. In that case, the difference between $8.8 and $10.8 million isn't a big deal.

However, that is the approximate amount of cap space that was saved in the trade of the #7 pick. In other words, even though it's a small amount, it obviously wasn't small to the Suns, since they gave up a pick for it.
 
OP
OP
slinslin

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Eric ( Ann Arbor): any news on rasheed and the pistons

David Aldridge: I've been told Rasheed probably won't make a decision until after the Fourth. He wants to spend the holiday with his family and hash out all the scenarios.

:thumbup:
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,131
Reaction score
6,564
Wow. I certainly hope DA is more right about these #s than he was about Amare.

Here is what I believe. I believe the Suns have already worked out a deal to move Eisley. But it is contingent upon a free agent's decision.

If they move Eisley, you can add his $6.x salary to the 7.5 they have left. That would give them max money ($14 plus).
 

The Commish

youknowhatimsayin?
Joined
Jun 16, 2004
Posts
2,201
Reaction score
11
Location
San Francisco
I could possibly see that. But moving Eisley's contract would still require some picks or at least a decent player. Max contracts scare me because you are tied up in them for so long (ie Googs and Penny).

If this were the case though, I would love to add Rasheed Wallace. I know he can be firey and get into trouble at times, but if the Suns want to get guy thats big and intimidating then Rasheed is the man...Just think of a lineup of:

Nash
JJ
Marion
Amare
'Sheed

That team would just be nasty!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
562,782
Posts
5,488,274
Members
6,340
Latest member
Beers
Top