Sorry, but this is nothing short of trolling. Opposing fans only come here for 2 reasons: either to intelligently talk football and learn more about who their team is playing that week or to just talk **** and bask in their ignorance. Luckily for you, this weeks game should instill a modicum of caution and decency in you for the future as far as boasting about your team's invincibility.
Your O-line has given up the most sacks in the league---twice as many as ours has. Our D has sacked opposing QBs more than your has. So why the hell should we be worried about you guys getting after our QB and not the other way around???
Instead of assigning a RB to help Bridges, we'll throw a TE over there and stonewall Matthews the same way we did with Jared Allen, when he didn't get so much as a tackle against us. Fortunately for us, we only have to worry about Matthews. The next closest guy for GB is Jenkins IIRC who has 4 or 5. You guys are gonna have to worry about Dockett, Campbell, Berry and Haggans every time Rodgers drops back.
I can tell you what will happen when you go 5 wide on us. Rodgers will hurt us a few times, but Davis will bring the house on him and he will be hurting for the remainder of the game. We have that effect on QBs. The better question is what you're gonna do when we go 4 wide or use our 2TE sets. This will be a much better game than you are anticipating bud.
I think both teams will throw the ball well. The team that wins the ground battle will win the game this week IMO.
I fail to see how much of what I have said this week constitutes trolling. And I'm increasingly surprised at the failure to see the difference between the 4-4 first half Packers and the 7-1 second half Packers.
Since week 8: Kurt Warner sacked 9 times in 7 games and a series.
Aaron Rodgers sacked 13 times in 7 games and three quarters.
Davis will bring the house?
Rodgers versus the blitz: 118-172 (69%), 1631 yards, 10 TD, 3 INT, 110.9 QBR, good for the second best QB in the league against the blitz after Brees.
http://cdn.cloudfiles.mosso.com/c117812/media_center/images/static/total_access/QBBlitz16.jpg
Team that wins the ground battle...
Green Bay Packers: 3.6 yards/carry allowed, first in the NFL.
Arizona Cardinals:
You must be registered for see images attach
That's as of week 16, because as I've been told numerous times all week, week 17 actually "doesn't count" because Whisenhunt and the Cardinals have the power to take a sixteen game regular schedule and make it a fifteen game regular season schedule just by exercising their will.
As far as the matchup with Matthews... taking a tight end out of the passing game entirely because he's such a handful can't be a bad thing for the Packers. But Bridges won't be able to handle him one on one.
Cold, Hard Football Facts, who really seems to be on top of their stuff, weighed in last night.
Green Bay at Arizona (-2.5)
The Cardinals are the home team, a division champ and the favorites.
But the data, the Cold, Hard Football Facts, tell us that this is a statistical bloodbath. The Packers, most notably, are No. 1 in our Defensive Hog Index and, as noted a few weeks ago, we look at them as a dark horse candidate to win it all.
In fact, we picked them this week on the SportsIllustrated.com prediction panel to win the whole steaming bratwurst. (The SI gang gives the Pack a lot of love, with six of nine so-called “experts” anticipating a Green Bay Super Bowl appearance.)
There is a huge problem for the Pack, of course: their statistical dominance has not translated into dominance on the scoreboard, as evidenced by the team’s nice-but-not-scary 11-5 record.
In this case, though, it’s literally impossible to find one area in which the Cardinals have looked like the better team this year: Green Bay top them in every single statistical indicator on the board, except for Bendability.
That’s what we like to call a preponderance of evidence in the court of pigskin jurisprudence.
Green Bay 28, Arizona 23
http://coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_3087_Real_and_spectacular_wildcard_picks.html
However, by virtue of the Cardinals "turning it on in the playoffs" last year, the fate of this game has already been sealed. Kurt has brought the spirit of the '99 Rams offense to be coupled with the '00 Ravens-esque defense the Packers are about to be bombarded with on Sunday, all skillfully hidden by the secretive and mysterious strategy of one Ken Whisenhunt, who wisely chose to hide such things all season only to unleash them tomorrow.
Of course I speak in jest, and the game may very well be close for awhile because playoff games typically
are close, but after watching every Packer game and (to this point) more than half of the Cardinals games this season, and I can't honestly convince myself that the Cardinals are a better team.
If you consider me a troll for that, then I'll suggest that you have thin skin. I don't intend to instigate anyone (unless they're really looking to be instigated) and I feel like I'm fairly well prepared to defend what I say. Sorry if it comes off otherwise.