SO91
ASFN Lifer
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2006
- Posts
- 3,046
- Reaction score
- 371
Who's we?
Who's we?
While I agree with you, I think you missed my point, or maybe I should've further explained my point. I am in no way saying that Amare was never going to be a more complete player. I am saying however, that this injury forced him to learn more at an earlier age in order to still be an effective player in this league coming back from surgery. The offseason leading up to the injury and surgery, Amare was talking about becoming a "Point Center", which I always found laughable. He mentioned how he was working on his 3 point shot, and his ball handling skills, which again, I found laughable. Ball handling, sure, work on that, but don't be out on the perimeter handling the ball. That was hardly the improvement I wanted to see coming from him.Cheesebeef's point is that Stoudemire is motivated enough that he would have learned those things even had he not gotten injured, and I agree. I really don't think there's any way you can argue that crippling a professional athlete in his early 20s works to his advantage. Otherwise, you'd see guys signing up for discretionary microfracture in the hope it would improve their games.
These videos are fun, but not terribly helpful in considering the whole season. I thought Amare was beginning to look close to being all the way back by the playoffs, but it's hard to tell.
The big plus is that he is less likely to try to dunk on really tall guys like Yao anymore. He'd get into these personal battles that distracted from playing the game.
The new one, the only problem is that imo Raja Bell and Shawn Marion have too big egos to feed Amare. I have no doubt he could have averaged 30/10 last season or this season if they would simply get him the touches he should get.
Cheesebeef's point is that Stoudemire is motivated enough that he would have learned those things even had he not gotten injured, and I agree.
Disagree. Only because he had to sit on the bench for a year and observe.
Amare has also repeatedly said that even though the injury was frustrating and it set him back, the positive he took from the injury was being able to become a "student of the game", and observe. Doesn't mean that he wouldn't have picked up on things if not for the injury, but it was good for him. Amare hadn't even tapped into his potential, and was still very raw. I'm sure he picked up on a lot just sitting and watching.i just don't get this - did people not see his game grow exponentially through each of his first three seasons? Why do people think that wouldn't have continued to happen? The guy's drive is unparalleled to almost any NBA player I can think of since Kobe Bryant, not only being the first high schooler to win the Rookie of the Year award, but then he boosted his game to 20 ppg the next, then boosted it to 26 ppg and 2nd team ALL-NBA the following year and then he coming back from horrific surgery to be First Team All-NBA. That's not the hallmarks of a kid who needed to observe anything IMO.
I actually thought that he did these things better this year, than the before the injury, which is why I think you can make a case that he was better this year, but sometimes it seemed the more his offensive game came back, the less he focused on his defense. I thought he was solid on defense the first half of the year. Steve Nash continually mentioned that in interviews. He still has a long way to improve in these areas though.The problem is that the stuff Amare really needs to learn can only be done through practice such as defensive footwork, boxing out, rotations, and anticipation on rebounding.
I actually thought that he did these things better this year, than the before the injury, which is why I think you can make a case that he was better this year, but sometimes it seemed the more his offensive game came back, the less he focused on his defense. I thought he was solid on defense the first half of the year. Steve Nash continually mentioned that in interviews. He still has a long way to improve in these areas though.
Amare has also repeatedly said that even though the injury was frustrating and it set him back, the positive he took from the injury was being able to become a "student of the game", and observe. Doesn't mean that he wouldn't have picked up on things if not for the injury, but it was good for him.
What else can you do when you're not playing though? My point isn't that every player needs to get hurt in order for them to be better for hell's sake. It doesn't mean he didn't pick up on anything while he was sitting there though.sorry, I don't care what Amare has said trying to make himself feel better about his game, no injury of the sort that Amare went through is "good" for anyone IMO. Transcendant players don't need to miss an entire season in order for them to watch and see what's happening on the court to make them better.
And if he learned so much as a student of the game, how come he still can't pass worth a damn, still plays pretty mediocre defense and still picks up more fouls per minute than he did pre-injury.
While I agree with you, I think you missed my point, or maybe I should've further explained my point.
The offseason leading up to the injury and surgery, Amare was talking about becoming a "Point Center", which I always found laughable.
He had to adjust his game when he came back. He could not rely soley on athletic ability to overcome other weaknesses. He was a little more fundamental...