Mason Cole as an OC in Kliff’s offense is a disaster. Wouldn’t be surprised if we try to scoop up someone if we can’t come to terms with AQ.
Things have really improved as a Cardinals fan if we are debating a 6th rd ILB and a C!
Lol he’s an old guy but he could still easily beat a 23.5in vertA stellar athlete indeed
You must be registered for see images attach
Do you do anything other than troll?Obviously he is older and slower now, but AQ was an elite athlete for OC coming out of college. Much, much, much more athletic than Mason Cole.
FTFYCouple things:
1. I should have said “Shipley was unquestionably a better athlete than Cole when he came out of college.”
2. NFL is a young man’s game, but elite offensive linemen frequently maintain their levels of play well into their 30s AND continuity on the line is extremely important.
Mason Cole as an OC in Kliff’s offense is a disaster. Wouldn’t be surprised if we try to scoop up someone if we can’t come to terms with AQ.
Lol he’s an old guy but he could still easily beat a 23.5in vert
looking at a pic of someone and judging athleticism is how you look like a clown btw. This is what all the SmartGuys did with Weaver w/o realizing the #s show him as above average for NFL LB.
Other than CB2 and WR4 they’re our most pressing issues!
Aside from QB2 of course.
It's entirely possible that Mason Cole actually isn't good. He got an "F" grade as a center from NFLCombineResults.com. I really want him to be good because I like the Wolverines and it would be great to have a top-notch center for once, but he doesn't have the physical traits you're looking for.
Gaillard doesn't have them either, apparently. He didn't work out at the Combine, but his pro day results were not good, either.
Do you do anything other than troll?
Wow WR4 a "pressing issue"
yes but if you are claiming continuity is of the most importance but then elevating a guy who has a few years left vs a young guy, it is a double standard. you can have two years of continuity or 10 but you choose the two year over the ten?For next year. Having most of the guys play all 16 last year was so important.
I’m not expecting AQ to be around too much longer, but he was fairly good last year and can actually zone block. I thought we would target a C in the 4th (like the Temple guy or Cushenberry), but the main targets went early.
This is where I stand. Like the guy...... and think he was serviceable. IMO he was a bottom 10 starting center the last three years.AQ Shipley isn't worth 3 pages.
Good guy. Average at best player. Should have been gone at least 2 years ago.
This is where I stand. Like the guy...... and think he was serviceable. IMO he was a bottom 10 starting center the last three years.
And good god...... everyone knows I love me a spider chart, but to call him athletic...... ever....... seems a bit wishy-washy to me with the amount of footage we have for him.
I just find it strange that every time I read one of your posts, it’s contents consist of some of the dumber thoughts I’ve read on here.wtf are you talking about?
do you not know how to read spider charts? or are you trolling?