Arizona Cardinals sign OL Dennis Daley

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,492
Reaction score
14,645
When said quarterback is rehabbing an ACL and going to miss a bunch of games.
Please show me anywhere where anyone definitively states Kyler is going to miss a "bunch" of games.

Pure speculation.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,266
Reaction score
40,258
Location
Colorado
i get news is slow

but, this is a league minimum guy who is taking 1/80 roster spots. Do we even know if he will play tackle?

you would think Monti just announced we signed our LT of the future
It is not the individual player, it is the overall group of players. When you say your plan is to build the lines, and then make them worse, people are justified in being critical of that.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,362
Reaction score
29,720
Location
Gilbert, AZ
i get news is slow

but, this is a league minimum guy who is taking 1/80 roster spots. Do we even know if he will play tackle?

you would think Monti just announced we signed our LT of the future
I mean, yes. In isolation this move is a nothing burger. But the timing of it (in the first week of free agency) and with the context of everyone else, it suggests that all of these were priority moves for the front office.

You don't jump at the beginning of free agency on randos and camp arms; you fill in your roster with these dudes after the draft. There's probably a plan for these guys to compete immediately for snaps; it's really the only explanation for why the players would sign a minimum salary deal now, as well.

This isn't the Bears or the Lions plan. This is the Houston Texans model and it's why they're embarrassing. There's no "out" of this cycle, because we're going to have to re-sign a bunch of dudes again next year.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,446
Reaction score
40,922
Location
UK
I mean, yes. In isolation this move is a nothing burger. But the timing of it (in the first week of free agency) and with the context of everyone else, it suggests that all of these were priority moves for the front office.

You don't jump at the beginning of free agency on randos and camp arms; you fill in your roster with these dudes after the draft. There's probably a plan for these guys to compete immediately for snaps; it's really the only explanation for why the players would sign a minimum salary deal now, as well.

This isn't the Bears or the Lions plan. This is the Houston Texans model and it's why they're embarrassing. There's no "out" of this cycle, because we're going to have to re-sign a bunch of dudes again next year.

There's like a dozen guys working in the FO and all these deals at every level will be worked on at the same time.

It's not like Monti is working down a list on his own.
 

Dayman

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
6,104
Reaction score
7,918
Location
Portland, Oregon
LOL Most sacks given up. That's a great signing right there. Cue the explanations as to why it's a great signing...
We have now signed the OT who gave up the most sacks last season and the Center who gave up the most sacks last season. If we can sign the Guard who gave up the most sacks last season, we will have the full set!
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,232
Reaction score
14,237
I mean, yes. In isolation this move is a nothing burger. But the timing of it (in the first week of free agency) and with the context of everyone else, it suggests that all of these were priority moves for the front office.
i think there is something to this-- especially in the absence of other moves

i still contend the level of angst is totally disproportionate

especially in light of a post by the one guy who has actually been paid for his takes on NFL players saying "he could be something at guard"
 

sdscard4

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Posts
3,640
Reaction score
2,686
Location
Louisville
Only we sign 2 dudes who've given up the most sacks. You gotta be freaking kidding me. These Monties are killing me
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,683
Reaction score
10,557
Based off of what? Hope?
Because this guy is an experienced starter. Our 4th OT is some undrafted free agent.

I mean yeah this guy is worse than I thought he could be when I first made the post, but he still has to be better than a guy off the street. With that said as bad as he appears to be I hope we never have to play him.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,492
Reaction score
14,645
Because this guy is an experienced starter. Our 4th OT is some undrafted free agent.

I mean yeah this guy is worse than I thought he could be when I first made the post, but he still has to be better than a guy off the street. With that said as bad as he appears to be I hope we never have to play him.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

Shouldn't a goal of a team be to avoid some of the standout worst players when considering acquisitions?
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,362
Reaction score
29,720
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Because this guy is an experienced starter. Our 4th OT is some undrafted free agent.

I mean yeah this guy is worse than I thought he could be when I first made the post, but he still has to be better than a guy off the street. With that said as bad as he appears to be I hope we never have to play him.
He's literally a guy off the street.

Or do you mean that he's better than some random bum?
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,701
Reaction score
23,787
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Because this guy is an experienced starter. Our 4th OT is some undrafted free agent.

I mean yeah this guy is worse than I thought he could be when I first made the post, but he still has to be better than a guy off the street. With that said as bad as he appears to be I hope we never have to play him.
Bad experience is worse than no experience. You cannot tell me this is the best, cheap guy with experience available. Sorry, no. "But he used to play for the Titans!" is not a reason to sign him. That kind of blind homerism GM-ship dents Monti's already battered rep at this point. This FO isn't showing consistency in what they're trying to do, and it shows.
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,854
Reaction score
8,293
Location
North of the 49th.
Bad experience is worse than no experience. You cannot tell me this is the best, cheap guy with experience available. Sorry, no. "But he used to play for the Titans!" is not a reason to sign him. That kind of blind homerism GM-ship dents Monti's already battered rep at this point. This FO isn't showing consistency in what they're trying to do, and it shows.

Monti has no reputation until the final list comes out of camp.

And Gannon has no reputation until we see how that plays on the field.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,701
Reaction score
23,787
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Monti has no reputation until the final list comes out of camp.

And Gannon has no reputation until we see how that plays on the field.
lol If you say it, it must be true. The fans and people following the NFL in general will refrain from forming opinions on him until then, I'm sure lol Gimme a break.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,578
Reaction score
15,839
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Copying the Bears and Lions in not historically a good idea.
At this point it’s either that or play the band-aid Keim philosophy.
This team is trash. We won 4 games last year with the players we had. How much worse can it get?
We are going to have to turn this roster over to get better. We are going to have to like it or lump it.
 
Top