AZ 19 SF 13 Thoughts

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
In some ways this week's game was one of the most challenging games the Cardinals have played this year. You already know all of the reasons why---but---one of the reasons is that the 49ers are making progress under Jim Tomsula and, as we saw, they still are a very physical and prideful football team.

Therefore, for the Cardinals to have persevered in this game, no matter how frustrating it was at times, and to win in SF for the first time since 2008, is laudable.

BA said it so well in his press conference that it is a luxury to be able to address improvement areas following a narrow win. And clearly, that is what the team intends to do, including new Papa Peterson who called the defense in today to get, as he said, "things fixed."

What Peterson is alluding to one would assume were the breakdowns in coverage where SF TEs were left uncovered on simple crossing patterns---the first of which came on a Gabbert scramble that put Markus Golden in the dubious position of having to decide whether to abandon coverage in order to tackle the QB or stick with the coverage and hope a teammate nearby could be there to make the tackle. Golden went for the QB and the QB threw to the TE. The second of which occurred when Gabbert scrambled again, only this time has the wherewithal to spot the open TE to the opposite side of the field. Why the TE was wide open on that play remains a mystery that Peterson and his teammates are trying to fix.

Gabbert, because of his mobility, presented the defense with a real problem---which is always the case when a defense plays as much man to man as the Cardinals do. What was frustrating is how easily Gabbert was able to bolt right through the pressure as Cardinals' rushers were not staying in their lanes, or getting off their blocks in time.

What's interesting is how BA's approach to offense is having an effect on the other offenses in the NFC West. Yesterday before the game, Jim Tomsula was saying that he wanted to take many more "shots downfield" than what they did in Seattle. Meanwhile, the Rams are running a whole lot of trips, stacks and bundle formations...and late in the 4th quarter, on a key 3rd and 6, the Seahawks, up 2, threw a gutsy pass over the middle which resulted in a surprising TD. In short, being super aggressive on offense is the rage of the NFL right now and BA has his fingerprints all over the trend. Plus---the two and three TE sets are now very in vogue around the league and not just in the NFC West.

If the SF was a battle of TEs---they would have won. The Cardinals' TEs were struggling, getting flagged for false starts, missing key blocks and not having much of a role in the passing game, save for a key reception by Jermaine Gresham in the 4th quarter. BA will be working extra hard on the TEs this week in practice.

He will also be working hard to figure out why his offense is struggling so badly in short yardage situations, as the line is not getting off the ball as they should and because of what looks to be missed assignments---like why didn't Mike Iupati block the ILB in his A gap who was closest to the short-yardage run away from his side.

It is not ideal to have smallish RBs like Chris Johnson and Andre Ellington be the ball carriers on third and short. It was great to see David Johnson, use his vision and power to cut back for his short yardage TD. David Johnson would appear to be best option in this role, and if Kerywnn Williams is promoted, even though his is a short RB, he has a knack for plowing into small creases in short yardage situations.

While the defense gave up its fair share of chunk yard plays---it may have been a blessing in disguise that Chandler Catanzaro missed the extra point, because it put an added sense of urgency for the defense to keep SF out of the end zone---which they managed to do thanks to a huge dialed up blitz sack of Gabbert by Tony Jefferson and then a dropped pass over the middle and then a throw underneath the sticks to Boldin that was two yards short---which, in retrospect for SF and Tomsula, Gabbert threw all too regularly underneath the sticks on third downs, and if not mistaken, SF was something like 0-9 in 3rd down conversions.

Huge plays on defense were delivered by Tyrann Mathieu who was all over the field making plays, which included 11 solo tackles, 3 pass breakups and a superb interception. Deone Bucannon made a huge play on 2nd and 1 in the 4th quarter where Sf could take the lead where he shot the gap and tackled Draughns for a 4 yard loss, setting up another 3rd down which Gabbert did not convert.

The kicking game had its warts---but Troy Niklas' huge hit on Bruce Ellington on one of the kickoffs was big, as was Alani Fua's recovery of Ellington's muffed punt.

The WRs had key catches to set up the FGs and TDs---like Palmer's stumbling bumbling falling backward lob to J.J. Nelson which he took to the SF one yard line---and Smokey Brown's 42 yard bomb---and Fitz's textbook out pass on 3rd down to the left sideline that moved the sticks on the GW drive---a drive which was led and finished off by the Cardinals' gutsy veteran QB, Carson Palmer. Palmer and company, just like the Cardinals' defense, stepped up when the chips were on the line---and in a game that felt and looked like it was going in frustratingly and painstakingly slow motion---the Cardinals picked up the pace very resiliently and tenaciously in crunch time.

Most importantly, what BA and his coaches have managed to do is create a fine blend of coaching preparation combined with superb player ownership.
 
Last edited:

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,151
Reaction score
8,074
Location
Scottsdale
I mentioned this in another thread - that, had the 9ers had a Gurley or Bell type running back, I tend to believe the outcome of this game would've resembled the outcome of the Rams and Steelers games... We were that off yesterday, in all phases of the game.
Still, a win is a win and it's great to be 9 & 2.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
Most importantly, what BA and his coaches have managed to do is create a fine blend of coaching preparation combined with superb player ownership.

Love this last point you made. I think it's one of the most important aspects of BA as a coach and a defining characteristic. He's always talking about player ownership, the importance of his captains, and the value of his veterans.

It's not just talk. We saw in the Peter King article on game planning that BA is one of the few, if not only, coach to let the QB pick his favorite scripted pass plays to start the game. We saw it again against Seattle, when on a crucial 3rd down Drew Stanton suggested a play Palmer liked in that situation, and coach called it for the win. Yet again today, during his presser, BA said the final pass to ice the game wasn't the play he called, but an adjustment by Palmer and one BA expects him to make. And finally, putting his young players in games in crunch-time situations. They may succeed or fail, but he makes them own this team, makes them own their own play, and that keeps every player prepared in practices and games, as he regularly gives game balls out to young, impact players and plays.

That's what being a player coach is all about. It's not because he's their best friend, it's because he forces them to take ownership of the team and its success or failure.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,477
Reaction score
16,651
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Make no doubt about it, the Cardinals are a finesse team. I am not saying they are soft because a good finesse team is not soft but they sure don't win by physically imposing their will. Just look at the end when Arians needed to run out the clock, and threw the unexpected dart for the first. A good finesse team will annihilate you if you do not match their scoring early and a good finesse team will beat you in the end of a close game by becoming a thief and stealing the victory with a big play, so it makes me laugh when some say this team has to match some teams in the division with physicality... this is not what the Cardinals are and that is not a problem :)
 

splitsecond

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Posts
5,582
Reaction score
1,536
Location
Chandler, AZ
Make no doubt about it, the Cardinals are a finesse team. I am not saying they are soft because a good finesse team is not soft but they sure don't win by physically imposing their will. Just look at the end when Arians needed to run out the clock, and threw the unexpected dart for the first. A good finesse team will annihilate you if you do not match their scoring early and a good finesse team will beat you in the end of a close game by becoming a thief and stealing the victory with a big play, so it makes me laugh when some say this team has to match some teams in the division with physicality... this is not what the Cardinals are and that is not a problem :)

I am OK with this. The Greatest Show on Turf was a finesse team.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,476
Reaction score
68,720
I am OK with this. The Greatest Show on Turf was a finesse team.

I don't really believe this to be the case. Just because they could score lightning quick doesn't mean they were a finesse team. they also had a DOMINATING offensive line and a HOF RB in his prime who could grind out yards, like he did in their second NFC Title game against the Eagles when Faulk pretty much carried them, with 160 yards and 2 TDs. They dominated the line of scrimmage, Faulk averaged something ridiculous like 5.5 ypc during their 3 year heyday. That ain't finesse. It looked like we were on the same track early in the year, but injuries to the O-line and now to the RBs stable is going to make us much more one-dimensional. Still a GREAT dimension to have, but it will force us to really be a finesse team.
 

Osbern61

Insomniac
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
3,566
Reaction score
517
Location
Philadelphia
While the defense gave up its fair share of chunk yard plays---it may have been a blessing in disguise that Chandler Catanzaro missed the extra point, because it put an added sense of urgency for the defense to keep SF out of the end zone---which they managed to do thanks to a huge dialed up blitz sack of Gabbert by Tony Jefferson and then a dropped pass over the middle and then a throw underneath the sticks to Boldin that was two yards short---which, in retrospect for SF and Tomsula, Gabbert threw all too regularly underneath the sticks on third downs, and if not mistaken, SF was something like 0-9 in 3rd down conversions.

great analysis, Mitch. This thought crossed my mind as well.
 

Jay Cardinal

Die Hard Cardinals Fan
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Posts
1,339
Reaction score
323
Location
Tempe, AZ
Great post as usual Mitch. We are very fortunate to come out with a win. Mobile quarterbacks continue to give us trouble.
 

Brak

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Posts
2,736
Reaction score
2,759
I am OK with this. The Greatest Show on Turf was a finesse team.

Many of the Niner great teams were labeled "finesse" teams, and it used to piss them off and provide motivation to prove it wrong. The '94 team in particular.. which went to the SB as 19 point favorites.. and covered that by a TD. I'd be OK with that end result.
 

Catfish

Registered
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Posts
4,551
Reaction score
64
Great points all Mitch, but the one that I feel most strongly about is the one that both you and Darkside discussed---------player ownership of the games and their preparation. I love that we have reached that point in which, (especially key players and captains), have taken ownership of their responsibilities and are taking charge of what is happening and how it is happening. I have taken huge satisfaction from that this year, and it has provided some of my happiest moments as a fan of the Cardinals.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,498
Reaction score
5,756
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Two things:
1. They say the definition of ............. is doing the same thing (running in short yardage situations) over and over and expecting a different outcome.
2. What is scary, is that if Gabbert's scrambling can create problems, what about Cam Newton?
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Two things:
1. They say the definition of ............. is doing the same thing (running in short yardage situations) over and over and expecting a different outcome.
2. What is scary, is that if Gabbert's scrambling can create problems, what about Cam Newton?

The scouting report said that SF was very weak against the run. Typically, when you keep running the D eventually wears down, so it becomes more effective over time.

However, in this case. Emphasizing the run as much as we did derailed the high octane passing game, made the game much closer than it should have been, and may have contributed to two rb injuries.
 
Top