AZ Cardinals Snap Counts vs Seattle

Capital Card

The Kobayashi of Kool-Aid
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
3,132
Reaction score
289
Location
Pigskin Slaughter House-Smithfield, VA
Offense and Defense ran similar number of plays against Seattle as they did against the Browns, 89 for the O and 61 for the D. Some items that I found interesting:

1. John Brown was on the field for 59 of 89 plays. I think this may have been his most invisible game of his young career.

2. With John Brown "healthy" again, Jaron was relegated back to the bench for all but 19% of offensive snaps.

3. For as active a day as Michael Floyd had, he was on the field for only 3 plays more than JB.

4. It was good to see Darren Fells back in the line-up for 56% of plays, however, Gresham got the call more often than any of the other TE's, lining up for 82% of offensive plays. Niklas only saw the field for 7%, one of his lowest totals of the season.

5. Obviously, Watford came in to spell Iupati; however, what I thought was interesting was Ted Larson being the active back-up for weeks 6-8, but not against Seattle. Not sure why they switched roles for this particular game.

6. For the DL, Gunter provided his lowest contribution in a game for the season, with his extra reps being picked up by Mauro. I'm not one to grade DL play, but I remember hearing Mauro's name get called a few time in the game. Will need to watch to see if this becomes a trend going forward.

7. Even though Okafor is healthy again, we limited his opportunities to only 66% of plays. Golden's play dropped off dramatically to only 16%, by far his smallest contribution of the season - though still more than Weatherspoon's one rep.

8. We've been consistent in keeping Freeny's snap counts right around 20-25 per game. Wasn't sure if Okafor's return would take plays away from Dwight. He did not.

9. Powers made it back on the field for all but two snaps after not playing in Cleveland, at the expense of playing time for Justin Bethel.


That is about it from my review. All stats available at Football Outsiders.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
Offense and Defense ran similar number of plays against Seattle as they did against the Browns, 89 for the O and 61 for the D. Some items that I found interesting:

1. John Brown was on the field for 59 of 89 plays. I think this may have been his most invisible game of his young career.

2. With John Brown "healthy" again, Jaron was relegated back to the bench for all but 19% of offensive snaps.

3. For as active a day as Michael Floyd had, he was on the field for only 3 plays more than JB.

4. It was good to see Darren Fells back in the line-up for 56% of plays, however, Gresham got the call more often than any of the other TE's, lining up for 82% of offensive plays. Niklas only saw the field for 7%, one of his lowest totals of the season.

5. Obviously, Watford came in to spell Iupati; however, what I thought was interesting was Ted Larson being the active back-up for weeks 6-8, but not against Seattle. Not sure why they switched roles for this particular game.

6. For the DL, Gunter provided his lowest contribution in a game for the season, with his extra reps being picked up by Mauro. I'm not one to grade DL play, but I remember hearing Mauro's name get called a few time in the game. Will need to watch to see if this becomes a trend going forward.

7. Even though Okafor is healthy again, we limited his opportunities to only 66% of plays. Golden's play dropped off dramatically to only 16%, by far his smallest contribution of the season - though still more than Weatherspoon's one rep.

8. We've been consistent in keeping Freeny's snap counts right around 20-25 per game. Wasn't sure if Okafor's return would take plays away from Dwight. He did not.

9. Powers made it back on the field for all but two snaps after not playing in Cleveland, at the expense of playing time for Justin Bethel.


That is about it from my review. All stats available at Football Outsiders.

Only thing I would comment on is #4 the TEs. Gresham only played a lot this game because Seattle plays cover 3 all day and the best way to beat it is TE's or receivers in the seams down the middle (see Gresham TD). Gresham is our best receiving TE, and while it only increased the chances of a successful play by maybe a few percent, that's what wins in the NFL. Perfect game plan for Seattle and aggressive, but hurt our running game not having Fells blocking (Iupati obviously also).

BA is a great game planner and play caller. I know some people have complained about many of his calls earlier in the season, but he really does match his personnel with his game plan, and his playcalling has been excellent. We have one of the best offenses in the NFL, if not the best.
 
Last edited:

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,407
Reaction score
4,153
Location
Monroe NC
I will comment on #5. Maybe they were worried about Massie being able to block on passing downs and wanted Watford available for RT. However when Iupati went down they had to put him in at LG since they made Larsen inactive.
 

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,370
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Tucson
I was wondering if Mauro got the snaps due to the long 1 & 2 downs, would have to see when Gunter was swapped. Mauro has played Seattle pretty well 3 games in a row now.
 
Top