So what you're saying is that going 4-12 and beating the Viking was greater than going 3-13 and one of the best rushers in the game? To each their own I guess, but that makes no sense at all to me. If we weren't 3-12 and knocking a team out of the playoffs it wouldn't be much of a big deal. The end result was still the Cardinal team watching the playoffs from home. If you take away the circumstances, how was that a better play than Q's rumble-in-the-bronx TD against Carolina??
If only the individual play, and none of the circumstances surrounding it, matters, then how did any of these moments make the list?
We've never had any plays that top a ten yard reception on fourth down, a long bomb for a TD, a long kickoff return or a 15 yard pass to a TE??
Without the significance (NFC Championship Game, Super Bowl, Playoff-clinching W, WC Game) none of those plays are near the top 10. Please explain to me why plays that lead to positive situations for the team can be counted on the list because of the positive results, yet plays that lead to negative results for the team can also be counted because we are supposed to ignore their negative effects????
Please don't try to tell me that winning that game was a positive thing because all W's are good either. Any win that doesn't go towards earning a playoff spot is a waste. There is no difference between a team going 3-13 or 4-12 other than going 3-13 should net them better players come draft day.
