False, it was nowhere near contrary. It was neutral, and brought up that the play is being considered "dirty." Meaning, he is reporting on a play that people are deeming "dirty."
Cut it out now.
LOL, the original assertion was that every article who wrote about the incident said it was dirty, the absence of which (neutral) proved you wrong. Nobody would say that it was a clean play, but many analyst out there said there is nothing wrong with it.
What ariticle do you expect, one that said Horry's play was clean, and that West was dirty to back into him?