Bleacher Report says QB competition a SHAM...

JC_AZ

JC_AZ
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Posts
1,593
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa
Arizona Cardinals' Quarterback Competition Exposed as a Sham

Arizona Cardinal head coach Ken Whisenhunt promised a fair QB competition. What he delivered was a sham, writes Tom Highway.
You must be registered for see images
by Tom Highway (Contributor)
4 comments 216 reads
August 07, 2008

Share this Story

Currently UnEdited

This article has not been edited yet.


You must be registered for see images

In the Cardinals' first preseason game of 2008, coach Ken Whisenhunt revealed what many already suspected: His so-called QB competition was nothing more than a sham. QB Kurt Warner, one of the stars of the Cardinals' 2007 season, didn't even play a single snap.
And he deserves better.
Fans should not have been surprised, as hints were abundant in the past few months. It was especially obvious when Whisenhunt recently praised Leinart's play last season[FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']—[/FONT]as if we had all forgotten how bad it truly was: "Yes, Kurt did a great job for us and played well," Cardinals coach Ken Whisenhunt said. "But Matt got hurt, he was our starter, and he was making progress."
And organizationally, the fix appeared to be in. On the Cardinals' official website, a fan poll for Cardinal MVP was published after the end of the season, and Kurt Warner was intentionally omitted. And then there was the 2007 season highlight film produced by the Bidwills that featured two-dozen touchdown catches with Warner's actual throws edited out.
But for those Cardinal watchers whose memories of 2007 are clear, the 2007 Matt Leinart season did not feature any resemblance of "progress"[FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']—[/FONT][FONT='Calibri','sans-serif'][/FONT]but rather some of the worst football seen at the QB position in recent Cardinal history.
Leinart posted the lowest passer rating in the NFL (61.9) and threw for the fewest yards per game (129), all while supported by Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin, two of the best wide receivers in the league.
Through five games, he completed one touchdown to Boldin and none to Fitzgerald. He averaged only 0.4 TDs per game, threw two interceptions for every TD, and completed only about 50 percent of his passes.
Furthermore, in the months leading up the 2007 season opener, Leinart was widely reported to be more focused on off-the-field "extracurricular" activities rather than the playbook, and his failure to grasp the offense was obvious.
After Leinart was injured[FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']—[/FONT]his second season-ending injury in his last five sacks[FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']—[/FONT]Kurt Warner elevated the passing attack from the worst-in-the-NFL to one of the top three.
With Warner at QB, the receivers, and the offense in general, enjoyed a resurgence. Warner finished in the top 10 in most QB categories, including passer rating (89.8), TDs per game, and yards per game. With only 11 starts, he completed 27 TDs.
Anquan Boldin, who was injured for much of the year, finished the season with nine TDs. Larry Fitzgerald finished with 10 and made the Pro Bowl.
In the last eight games, the offense was especially explosive, with Warner completing 21 TDs. Had the defense not been decimated by injuries, the Cardinals would have been a dangerous contender in the playoffs.
Yet in the 2007's final postgame press conference, Warner's performance was dismissed with a cliché. Whisenhunt declared that a player should not lose his job to injury, and Leinart was declared the 2008 starter.
As a side note, some of the all-time greats took jobs from injured players. Fortunately for Lou Gehrig and Tom Brady, neither played for a Whisenhunt.
Fans attending camp in Flagstaff have universally described Warner as razor-sharp[FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']—[/FONT]so sharp that the Bidwills and Whisenhunt have decided to bury him on the bench away from the public eye.
So apparently, the second-best Arizona QB will start again this season opener, just as he did last year. Again, the fans' hopes for a run at the playoffs may be dashed, but the meddling Bill Bidwill[FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']—[/FONT]the PT Barnum of the NFL[FONT='Calibri','sans-serif']—[/FONT]will be smiling.
Will "The Bowtie" be smiling toward the field at his marketing gimmick that he bullied into the lineup? Or will it be a sneer toward the stands at a perceived collection of "suckers born every minute"?
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,342
Reaction score
12,011
lol. A sham because he did want him with the 2nd stringers?

Get real.
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
For crying out loud, the idiot is blaming Bill Bidwill for Warner not playing. Can someone bring this yard bird into the 20th century?
 

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
811
Location
Bakersfield, CA
Very inaccurate at times and very misleading at others. Is Bleacher Report another PFT, or what?
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
Currently UnEdited

This article has not been edited yet.

:doi:
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
If it was really a sham, wouldn't we just want Kurt to go away? Wouldn't the best way for that to happen be to throw him in behind our 2nd stringers?

I want Kurt and Matt protected by the best OL we have. If that isn't an option, sit them both in the preseason, for all I care. Matt needs the work. Kurt doesn't. No reason to risk injury now. End of story.
 

ShadowGBQ

Newbie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Posts
32
Reaction score
0
Seriously, what is wrong with this guy?

Kurt Warner impressed me last year, but if this cat wants to claim this conspiracy and rattle off all these anti-Leinart stats, I have a stat or two for him:

Number of quarterbacks on our roster who have forgotten what team they play for during a game: 1

Number of quarterbacks who only needed to take two snaps from scrimmage to beat the Rams and failed to: 1

Number of conspiracy-accusing whackjobs who worship Kurt Warner for going to church Sundays, marrying a dude & throwing 800 identical twelve yard in-routes to wide open receivers on a nintendo field for 3 years -- waaayyy too many.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,566
Reaction score
40,372
ASFN says Tom Highway is a sham.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
There's no reason to be a jerk about Brenda. Seriously.

Agreed. She is actually a very good looking older women especially in person. She just had a horrible hair cut for a few years. One of the nicest people you will ever meet as well. Met them at a charity event about a year and a half ago. Gracious and kind, the both of them.

http://premierespeakers.com/brenda_warner
 

ShadowGBQ

Newbie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Posts
32
Reaction score
0
You're right, that was rude of me, I'm sorry.

Marrying a gentleman.

I like Warner more now than ever, he had an amazing season last year given his ability and the circumstances. But he has never been a quiet, team-oriented backup since he started his first game. If Matt takes every snap this season, one can only hope Kurt (or Brenda) will not distract the team with some ill-advised, self-pitying interview or quote at some point during the year. Things could change.

Mokler -- I thought asking what was wrong with this cat was fairly tactful. Note that Tom H. was called lame, an idiot, a sham by some familiar ASFN peeps in here and I understand where they are coming from. "Columnists" who are this obnoxious, libelous and irrational should keep it on the barstool where it belongs. But I really just found the guy a good laugh. I didn't mean to harm any non-lunatics.
 
Last edited:

moklerman

Rise from the Ashes III
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
5,318
Reaction score
811
Location
Bakersfield, CA
Mokler -- I thought asking what was wrong with this cat was fairly tactful.
Most would agree but it was your method that I questioned. Pointing to low points in Warner's career and then insulting his wife hardly seemed to illustrate your dislike of the writer. I agree that the writer is way off base and ill-informed.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,669
Location
CA
I cant believe Tim Hightower would write such an article when he has only been with the Cards for a few weeks. That is no way to win a RB job. :D
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,978
Reaction score
7,313
Location
Mesa, AZ
The article is pretty stupid but anyone who honestly believes there is an open competition at QB are deluding themselves. Nothing open about it IMO.
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,662
Reaction score
1,082
Location
Needles, Ca.
For crying out loud, the idiot is blaming Bill Bidwill for Warner not playing. Can someone bring this yard bird into the 20th century?

Go you one better. Bring this yard bird into the 21st. century......:)
 

Chris_Sanders

Arizona Sports Simp
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,721
Reaction score
32,852
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Number of conspiracy-accusing whackjobs who worship Kurt Warner for going to church Sundays, marrying a dude & throwing 800 identical twelve yard in-routes to wide open receivers on a nintendo field for 3 years -- waaayyy too many.

You are done here for good. Find somewhere else to post.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
lol. A sham because he did want him with the 2nd stringers?

Get real.

There has to be more to Warner not playing than we know. Common sense dictates he takes at least a series of snaps unless he had a tweak of some sort. It would almost be an insult not to let him make a few throws if he were healthy. The kind of message you do not want to send to a guy who may end up playing more than your QB of the future. What if Matt is lousy the first three games and we lose? Do we continue down the same path? We are in a situation not unlike Green Bay was with Favre. Would Favre or the untried backup give them the best chance to win this year? Time will tell. I would not want to be the GM if the new QB falls on his butt after a 13/3 season behind Favre. Backups are there for a reason and that is to replace the starter who is normally the guy who gives you the best chance of winning. I personally am more concerned with THIS year and not any future year so I want the best QB to start and I do not care if it is Matt or Warner. A QB or any other player should not be played because of his salary but because he is the best guy to get the job done. Matt looked good in the game. If he can play like that for an entire game then he should be the starter. The future in the NFL is NOW. Odds are we will see a lot of both of these QB's this year.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,174
Posts
5,453,081
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top