Boo-hoo Jason Kidd

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I don't really care either way for Jason Kidd. The season or two after he was traded to New Jersey I hated him and especially the way the Eastern media covered him and his family. The latest news out of New Jersey is that Jason Kidd is very upset with the Nets for trading Martin to Denver. Anybody else finding it difficult to really feel sorry for Kidd?

Obviously the general managers should bear the brunt of the criticism for failed signings, trades, etc., but it's been the moves that Kidd orchestrated in Phoenix and New Jersey that have led his teams to these situations. Yes, it was Jason Kidd who went to the Phoenix Suns and urged them to go hard after Penny Hardaway. Obviously they could have resisted. They should have. But it all want to hear Jason Kidd complain that they have trouble keeping and acquiring players when his recruits are abysmal disasters.

In New Jersey it's arguably been worse. First, he urged them to get rid of Keith Van Horn and it sounds like he wanted Mutombo. He is still on their salary cap this season for over $14 million. I forget what the settlement was, but I imagine they are probably still paying for him as well.

Even worse was the Alonzo Mourning catastrophe. His acquisition was a requirement for Jason Kidd to re-sign with New Jersey last summer. Well, that essentially means that New Jersey is paying Jason Kidd over $20 million next season because Mourning hardly played for the Nets. In fact in the last year of Alonzo Mourning's contract, 2006-07, the New Jersey Nets will be paying a combined $24 million for Kidd, who will be turning 34.

Of course I Jason Kidd isn't asking for a trade right now. That would be lunacy. He's the biggest reason they are in the salary situation that meant they could not re-sign Kenyon Martin. He is also a 31-year-old point guard who just had a major knee operation and is in just the second year of a huge, seven-year, super maximum contract. No team in its right mind would give the New Jersey Nets anything valuable for him. New York is the only team stupid enough to do that, and Isaiah Thomas already gave away every asset last year to get Marbury.

Jason Kidd, you've dug your own grave... now lie in it. BTW if you had half a brain you would have signed with San Antonio last year.

Lastly, and on another subject, is Isaiah Thomas the worst GM in the NBA? Why in the world would he want to give Jamaal Crawford a contract starting at somewhere in the $7-10 million range?

And that includes my Saturday morning rant.

Joe Mama
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,910
Reaction score
10,605
Location
L.A. area
It's amazing to me that Kidd never loses his luster in the media. He had attitude problems in Dallas and his teams there always underachieved. He beat up his wife in Phoenix and became a spiteful, petty cornholio once traded. He enforced several bad personnel decisions in New Jersey and now wants out at the first sign of trouble.

And still every writer loves him. It's just weird.
 

cepstrum

Shqiptar i Qart
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Posts
609
Reaction score
0
Location
Tempe
elindholm said:
It's amazing to me that Kidd never loses his luster in the media. He had attitude problems in Dallas and his teams there always underachieved. He beat up his wife in Phoenix and became a spiteful, petty cornholio once traded. He enforced several bad personnel decisions in New Jersey and now wants out at the first sign of trouble.

And still every writer loves him. It's just weird.
You know I was pretty mad when the JK for SM trade went down, but I would now like to thank the colagelo's for their forsight.
 

fordronken

Registered User
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Posts
3,806
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles area
I say we trade Shawn Marion for Jason Kidd, re-sign KJ, then realize we have a log jam at point guard, and trade Nash for Marion. After that, we could probably use Kidd to get Stephon Marbury. I'm a little afraid of how Marbury would fit in with Amare, though. I know we'd probably want to build around Marbury, JJ, Mariona and Amare, but I think at that point we should just try to get some cap space. Nash will be a free agent in about six years.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
I wish Kidd would have signed with San Antonio last year.


That way he could have screwed over a very dangerous competitor instead of screwing over an Eastern Conference team that's going to suck anyway. :p
 

JS22

Say Vandelay!
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
5,791
Reaction score
211
Joe Mama said:
I don't really care either way for Jason Kidd. The season or two after he was traded to New Jersey I hated him and especially the way the Eastern media covered him and his family. The latest news out of New Jersey is that Jason Kidd is very upset with the Nets for trading Martin to Denver. Anybody else finding it difficult to really feel sorry for Kidd?

Obviously the general managers should bear the brunt of the criticism for failed signings, trades, etc., but it's been the moves that Kidd orchestrated in Phoenix and New Jersey that have led his teams to these situations. Yes, it was Jason Kidd who went to the Phoenix Suns and urged them to go hard after Penny Hardaway. Obviously they could have resisted. They should have. But it all want to hear Jason Kidd complain that they have trouble keeping and acquiring players when his recruits are abysmal disasters.

In New Jersey it's arguably been worse. First, he urged them to get rid of Keith Van Horn and it sounds like he wanted Mutombo. He is still on their salary cap this season for over $14 million. I forget what the settlement was, but I imagine they are probably still paying for him as well.

Even worse was the Alonzo Mourning catastrophe. His acquisition was a requirement for Jason Kidd to re-sign with New Jersey last summer. Well, that essentially means that New Jersey is paying Jason Kidd over $20 million next season because Mourning hardly played for the Nets. In fact in the last year of Alonzo Mourning's contract, 2006-07, the New Jersey Nets will be paying a combined $24 million for Kidd, who will be turning 34.

Of course I Jason Kidd isn't asking for a trade right now. That would be lunacy. He's the biggest reason they are in the salary situation that meant they could not re-sign Kenyon Martin. He is also a 31-year-old point guard who just had a major knee operation and is in just the second year of a huge, seven-year, super maximum contract. No team in its right mind would give the New Jersey Nets anything valuable for him. New York is the only team stupid enough to do that, and Isaiah Thomas already gave away every asset last year to get Marbury.

Jason Kidd, you've dug your own grave... now lie in it. BTW if you had half a brain you would have signed with San Antonio last year.

Lastly, and on another subject, is Isaiah Thomas the worst GM in the NBA? Why in the world would he want to give Jamaal Crawford a contract starting at somewhere in the $7-10 million range?

And that includes my Saturday morning rant.

Joe Mama


This post makes me smile! :D
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
562,879
Posts
5,489,345
Members
6,340
Latest member
Beers
Top