Both Phoenix and Chicago Need a Trade

silverstyne

Newbie
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Posts
22
Reaction score
0
After watching both Phoenix and Chicago play this week, I can sense both teams need a heart transplant. How about a major trade:

PHOENIX TRADES
Shawn Marion
Leandro Barbosa
Marcus Banks

CHICAGO TRADES
Ben Wallace
Andres Nocioni
Chris Duhon

It works on the Real GM Trade Checker. It probably needs a little tweaking - Chicago has lots of cheap rookies that are trade fodder. I know that Coach Mike would never go for this though (offensive players vs defensive ones) In any case, what do you guys think?
 

green machine

I rule at posting
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Posts
6,126
Reaction score
11
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I don't want anything to do with Ben Wallace. He's not an impact player anymore, and he's soooooooo bad on offense it is sad.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
Bad moves for both teams. With Gordon, what do Bulls need LB for? And we can't really use Ben and wouldn't want to touch his contract anyway.
 

YouJustGotSUNSD

Custom User Title!
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
5,168
Reaction score
0
Our two most marketable and valuable players for pennies on the dollar.

thumbs down

Plus, after a coach swap I doubt they want to blow up the team anyway.

Although a coach swap and a player change at once isn't out of the range of possibilities.
 

asudevil83

Registered User
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Posts
2,061
Reaction score
1
haha.....aweful. Wallace right now = Banksx4 as far as bad contracts go. so he's basically just a huge filler in evening out contracts.

MAYBE:

Wallace
Deng
Thomas

Marion
Barbosa
 

asuhoopnut

Veteran
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Posts
180
Reaction score
0
haha.....aweful. Wallace right now = Banksx4 as far as bad contracts go. so he's basically just a huge filler in evening out contracts.

MAYBE:

Wallace
Deng
Thomas

Marion
Barbosa


Throw in Sefaloosha (sp?) and a 1st round pick from Chicago and I'm on board. It's time for a shakeup with some young talent that's definitely in need of a change of scenery after being beaten down by Skiles.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,851
I would be on board too. Wallace is EXACTLY what this offense needs. Move Amare back to PF along with Wallace at C is great. Leave Wallace behind to clean up the boards, crash the offensive glass. You then get Deng or Thabo or whoever to play SF.

Nash
Bell
Thabo/Deng
Amare
Wallace

looks pretty good to me.

I don't mind playing 4 on 5 offensively if we can get the defense of Wallace.
 

OldDirtMcGirt

Registered User
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
1,255
Reaction score
0
I don't see why Chicago would do this. Their biggest problem is a lack of guys that can't score consistently and create their own offense, so why in the world would they trade for Shawn, especially when they already have Luol Deng. The things that Shawn brings to the table (rebounding, defense, and hustle) are already strengths of the Bulls.
 

arwillan

The King
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Posts
2,952
Reaction score
0
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2429~3224~3032~2165~2166~3238&teams=21~21~21~4~4~4&te=&cash=




We get a bunch of help defensively and on the boards (what we desperately need). We also get a good scorer in deng and a guy who can finish in thomas.


They get a guy who can create his own shot in barbosa (what they desperately need). Then they get another offensive guy to cover ben wallace's lack of offense in the front court in Tucker. Banks is there mostly as a filler but his defense would fit right in out there. He can also use his quickness to get into the lane which could help chicago become somewhat less of a jump-shooting team (barbosa also contributes to this area).


http://games.espn.go.com/nba/featur...2165~2166~3238&teams=21~21~21~4~4~4&te=&cash=

that's another variation of the same trade. it makes it more friendly to chicago because they can keep noah and give up sefalosha instead.
 
Last edited:

dodie53

A. O. II
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Posts
6,320
Reaction score
2
Location
Tondo, Manila
the Bulls wouldn't trade Deng for Kobe so why would they do that trade?
and they already have Gordon.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
the Bulls wouldn't trade Deng for Kobe so why would they do that trade?
and they already have Gordon.

I'm not sayin they'd trade Deng for Marion but I bet they'd trade Deng for Kobe now.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
I'm not sayin they'd trade Deng for Marion but I bet they'd trade Deng for Kobe now.

That's Kobe who didn't want to join the Bulls without Deng on it.

But if they are trying to dump Wallace's contract, I might be willing to do Marion/Banks/Pike for Wallace/Thomas/Sefolosha/Duhon.
 
Last edited:

Divide Et Impera

Registered User
Joined
Apr 7, 2003
Posts
14,395
Reaction score
2
Location
Maricopa, AZ
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2429~3224~3032~2165~2166~3238&teams=21~21~21~4~4~4&te=&cash=




We get a bunch of help defensively and on the boards (what we desperately need). We also get a good scorer in deng and a guy who can finish in thomas.


They get a guy who can create his own shot in barbosa (what they desperately need). Then they get another offensive guy to cover ben wallace's lack of offense in the front court in Tucker. Banks is there mostly as a filler but his defense would fit right in out there. He can also use his quickness to get into the lane which could help chicago become somewhat less of a jump-shooting team (barbosa also contributes to this area).


http://games.espn.go.com/nba/featur...2165~2166~3238&teams=21~21~21~4~4~4&te=&cash=

that's another variation of the same trade. it makes it more friendly to chicago because they can keep noah and give up sefalosha instead.

WTF?!?!?!?

You do know that the Bulls do not exist as an organization solely to help the Suns, right?
 

Bufalay

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
4,679
Reaction score
786
Marion is exactly the type of player that the Bulls don't need.
 

arwillan

The King
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Posts
2,952
Reaction score
0
WTF?!?!?!?

You do know that the Bulls do not exist as an organization solely to help the Suns, right?

you do know that the bulls are 9-17 (34%) right now with a coach who was brought in in the middle of the year, right? they need to make a change.
 

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,358
Reaction score
65,717
Location
Crowley, TX
^^
That's a terrible change for the Chicago Bulls.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,705
Reaction score
57,922
I wonder what Amare is worth to the Bulls? I definitely would not want Wallace in return.
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
The Bulls aren't a realistic trade partner as we won't trade Amare & they can't use Marion. Teams like the Grizzlies, Lakers, and Raptors would have a use for Marion. But only the Lakers & Grizzlies would have pieces we would want.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
The Bulls aren't a realistic trade partner as we won't trade Amare & they can't use Marion. Teams like the Grizzlies, Lakers, and Raptors would have a use for Marion. But only the Lakers & Grizzlies would have pieces we would want.

Getting rid of Ben's contract for Marion might be enticing to the Bulls. If they decide to rebuild, trading Ben/Thomas/Sefolosha/Duhon for Marion/Banks/Marks might be good start.

Now Amare has shown his dominance and smarts on offense, I'm not opposed to having Ben starting next to him, who'd be able to set hard picks for Nash and LB to make himself useful on offense.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,076
Posts
5,405,219
Members
6,316
Latest member
Dermadent
Top