Meh, if you get 3 or 4 years out of him on a rookie contract, it's all good. Also, he's probably more plug and play be other rookie RBs that only have a year of starting in college.
The argument against Drake is his age...you may only get 3 or 4 years out of him, but in a FA contract, which may be more costly than the rookie deal.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
The argument for Drake is he did great this year and has low carries in his career, the argument against him is he has low carries because he was always hurt in college. With Taylor I would say two things, he hasn't shown he can catch the ball, had a drop today for example, and I just am always worried with a RB who's had that many carries in college.
But he's certainly very impressive, and I agree on a rookie contract if you get the same years out of him you do out of Drake you're better off money wise. Just hard to know if he can catch the ball, can he pass protect etc.
I do think its' quite possible, almost likely that Drake prices himself out for us.