arwillan
The King
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2006
- Posts
- 2,952
- Reaction score
- 0
i say let webber go to the mavs. he isnt going to help them beat the suns much, and if they get him we are the front-runners for PJ
IMHO, his offensive breakdowns last season came from him playing out of position at SF.
I would offer another opinion of Boris Diaw. In the NBA, everyone studies your tendencies and Boris has tendencies that have been learned. Its like a guy who can only drive to his right is overplayed to his right by the opposition. Guys who are excellent dribble penetrators but cant shoot outside are defended by the defender backing off. Boris must now adjust to make the opposition pay for playing to his tendencies. Here are some of Boris tendencies:
The problem with this assesment is that Boris wasn't trying to do things and being stopped. He just wasn't doing things. He was passive. He wanted the team to operate like an oiled machine where everybody passed and nobody worried about shots. He passed to move the offense, but the offense didn't work that way. He needed to be more aggressive and make plays for himself within the offense. That was his problem. He wasn't going to the basket and getting stopped because he was over scouted.
The problem with this assesment is that Boris wasn't trying to do things and being stopped. He just wasn't doing things. He was passive. He wanted the team to operate like an oiled machine where everybody passed and nobody worried about shots. He passed to move the offense, but the offense didn't work that way. He needed to be more aggressive and make plays for himself within the offense. That was his problem. He wasn't going to the basket and getting stopped because he was over scouted.
When both Boris and Amare are in the lineup, it would mean moving Amare to the left low post. If the defender comes out to deal with Diaw, it would leave Amare defended by one guy when Boris makes a dump off pass following a drive.
If PJ Brown was off the table I'd be more happy with Chris Webber than any other big that would be remaining. Sure, he isn't a strong defender like Brown or Thomas. He is a big body who can still hit the boards. He can still keep defenses honest with his passing and shooting.
I've not heard the Phoenix Suns mentioned regarding Chris Webber though, and he would probably be too expensive.
I think Chris Webber could be a very good signing for the Dallas Mavericks.
Joe
idk about expensive, iirc he was with detroit for about 900k last year
Assuming this wasn't supposed to be a joke...
Webber was still paid a billion dollars by Philadelphia last season. The Sixers bought him out and he chose to go to Detroit. Since his net salary was going to be the same no matter what, he took only the minimum from the Pistons.
The full MLE for Webber this year would be a huge pay cut, and it's unlikely he will accept less from anyone.
Posting Amare in the low block does not appear to be something Mike wants to do much - probably because his defender can lean hard on him, stressing his knees. In fact, he wasn't having Amare post low much the last year before the microfracture.
I don't think Amare would be "posted" in the classic sense, but then again he wasn't used that way before Nash either. Amare was never a "back to the basket" guy, but was more inclined to work the baseline in space. In 2003-04 Voskuhl and later McDyess were used by D'Antoni in the high post (McDyess was much more effective) and Amare averaged 20.6 ppg despite coming off his injury. The idea of using Amare exclusively at the high post came with the switch to small ball the following year.
Exactly what I was thinking. C-Webb's just a nice player these days, but one could only hope they'd play him at center against us. Diaw could actually match up with him. Webber's still a really good high-post player. He's kind of a heavier, slower Diaw with a better jump shot, and not nearly the brute he used to be. Still a better fundamental rebounder, though.
That would be a high-scoring matchup if the Suns went with a lineup that included Amare and Diaw vs. Dirk and Webb. Dirk would be in foul trouble in about 2.3 seconds.
And if Webber were to sign, he would prob. get 20-25 MPG at the backup four and spot 5 minutes when match-ups are favorable. Diop and Damp have been more than serviceable versus the Suns given their lack of rebounding and Damps prowess for offensive boards. Webber would just be icing on the cake.
I think that if this happens your looking at a 2nd unit that would consist of Jason Terry, Jerry Stackhouse, Chris Webber, & Eric Dampier. All older players but all proven scores w/ the exception of Dampier who is an above average defender down low and one of the best offensive rebounders in the NBA. Offensively that squad could hang with the Suns starters for short stretches and is ahead of the Suns 6-9 guys.
Since when has Diop and Damp been serviceable? Damp has had only a couple good games (including that massive offensive rebounding game) against the Suns. Diop I don't think has ever showed up. More then anything they both have been in foul trouble against the Suns and spent allot of time on the bench.
Also, I would love to see Diop and Webber on the court at the same time. Our forwards will run circles around your front court if that's the case. Webber can't defend that well anymore either.
I do like what C-Webb adds to your low post scoring though. He is not going to light up anybody but he is a legit threat under the basket which the Mavs really don't have in Diop and Damp at this point.
When we had no size. Hell, Greg Ostertag would've been effective against the midgets we threw out there.Diop was instrumental in the WCF versus the Suns in 06.
When we had no size. Hell, Greg Ostertag would've been effective against the midgets we threw out there.
Diop was instrumental in the WCF versus the Suns in 06.
Diop did a pretty good job on Diaw.
Fine, you guys are Gods gift to basketball.
TTYL