Goodyear Card
Link Guy
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2006
- Posts
- 2,190
- Reaction score
- 1,850
I like it too. It does seem to reason that they aren't going to sign a player like Clowney though...Another young guy?
I like it...
Worst case, he provides competition for the draft picks.
But a waiver pick up indicates they are hoping for more
Hood imoI like it too. It does seem to reason that they aren't going to sign a player like Clowney though...
I'll agree to disagree. You're counting on a Vance Joseph led defense to let young, unproven players play. Proof says the opposite will likely happen...Lol. *good
I'll agree to disagree. You're counting on a Vance Joseph led defense to let young, unproven players play. Proof says the opposite will likely happen...
I'm not sure what you are trying to get at here. That Chandler Jones wasn't the best edge rusher this team has ever had? That we will somehow be better on the edge this year with our current roster?Well, the 'unproven' under Vance had more sacks without CJ (48) two seasons ago than with him last season (41).
No. Not unless he is unemployed in late July and willing to work cheap.I like it too. It does seem to reason that they aren't going to sign a player like Clowney though...
I see what you’re saying but I don’t think this team can be successful led by a Vance Joseph D. If we aren’t putting points on the board we are doomed. Clowney is a run stuffer. If we are going to be successful, it’ll have to be putting opponents in the position where they have to throw the ball.I'll agree to disagree. You're counting on a Vance Joseph led defense to let young, unproven players play. Proof says the opposite will likely happen...
Two seasons ago, the big "unproven" was Simmons...and he didn't play much because he made too many mistakes early in the season. You still had Reddick, Hicks, Peterson, PP21, Murphy, Budda and Golden (brought in when CJ went down). That's a veteran group on defense, for the most part. I would say last year, even with CJ and the addition of Watt, you had more "unproven" on defense. When you have a true rookie playing CB a limited pass rush can be exposed.Well, the 'unproven' under Vance had more sacks without CJ (48) two seasons ago than with him last season (41).
I'm not sure what you are trying to get at here. That Chandler Jones wasn't the best edge rusher this team has ever had? That we will somehow be better on the edge this year with our current roster?
I see what you’re saying but I don’t think this team can be successful led by a Vance Joseph D. If we aren’t putting points on the board we are doomed. Clowney is a run stuffer. If we are going to be successful, it’ll have to be putting opponents in the position where they have to throw the ball.
Sadly it kinda doesn't. 100% reason why I am good with using limited resources for Vance. Dude isn't going to do much with them anyway.I guess it really doesn't matter what we do then... lol
I'm not as down on VJ as most here. I think that he just prioritizes stopping the pass.Sadly it kinda doesn't. 100% reason why I am good with using limited resources for Vance. Dude isn't going to do much with them anyway.
Beat me to it:championship:
That's not correct, Oaken. He makes a lot of pressures on the quarterback, but unfortunately that doesn't show up on the stat sheet. He is overall a much better pass rusher than given credit for, and I would personally feel great if they added him.All clowney really brings to the table is run defense anyway