Cardinals' Free Agency Day One grade

FA day one grade

  • A

    Votes: 7 5.6%
  • B

    Votes: 79 63.7%
  • C

    Votes: 33 26.6%
  • D

    Votes: 4 3.2%
  • F

    Votes: 1 0.8%

  • Total voters
    124

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
8,243
Reaction score
12,495
Location
St Louis, MO
I gave it a C. This is what I expected Monti to do, although the signings happened earlier and cost more than I thought they would.

None of these guys broke the top 100 free agents on nfl.com or the top 150 on PFF. That obviously doesn't mean they won't be good signings, but it's a little tough to get too excited about them. The D-line needed bodies, so those signings make sense from a positional standpoint. Pff said Murphy-Bunting struggled mirroring receivers and needs to play zone to be effective. That should be interesting. The team did get better today, though, so I can't complain much.

However, the problem with treating free agency like this is that you really have to nail the draft. I wasn't super impressed with his draft last year, so I'm hoping for better things this year.
I'll admit the concerning thing for me is I think other teams just got better. A lot of pressure to nail the draft and a lot of pressure on Kyler to carry (which by contract he should).
 

SoonerLou

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Posts
8,243
Reaction score
12,495
Location
St Louis, MO
They needed to add competent DT players. They did. Still lots of work to do to get us to 6 wins. I am not sure any of this gets us to 5.

Since the team won 3 games in the 8 that Kyler played, doesn't that put the minimum projected wins for next season at 6, even without an improved defense? I'd say we've already improved the one of the league's worst defense and 6 wins or more seems like a good bet. A few more free agency adds and a good draft with our 11 draft choices and 8-9 wins should be realistic.
Only thing is a couple of those wins came against Desmond Ridder and Mitch Trubisky. Cowboys (Dobbs)/Eagles wins were impressive, but a cynic could charge that to typical Cowboy sleepwalking game and Eagles defense being a disaster to end the year.

I'm not against the signings. It's just for the longest I thought we were getting one of the major defensive free agents. Maybe it's my fault for thinking that.
 
OP
OP
Totally_Red

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,931
Reaction score
4,929
Location
Iowa
I give his grades an F because he's basing it on slight differences in money, which is a bad way to grade FA, which is essentially an overpay exercise.
Cardinals are not, at least not yet, a desirable free agent destination. Better to slightly over pay than miss out completely like last year. Monti learned from last year IMO.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,837
Reaction score
41,734
Location
UK
I gave a B because you don't build teams through FA, you build through the draft.

For me these are the kind of solid roster additions that are more important to sign. There were some absolute NUTS deals by desperate teams yesterday.

We have a lot of draft capital and these were solid vets for them to work with.

And nobody can complain they are short term deals.
 

eastcoastDave

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2020
Posts
323
Reaction score
572
Location
Chesapeake, Va
I gave these signings a C. Would have preferred to sign one very good D lineman, rather than 2 rotation pieces. Maybe these guys will surprise. We’ll see. It was deflating last year seeing team after team gash the Cardinals. I liked the draft last year and with the accumulated picks the team has this year, I expect to see a real step forward on the field. I suspect Cards will draft Harrison, then a defensive lineman, then cornerback with first 3 picks. After that, they’ll go with best players available to fill the many holes the team has.
 

Fitz4Ever

Veteran
Joined
Jan 13, 2023
Posts
475
Reaction score
911
Location
Idaho
I gave it a C. I never expected us to get a big name player...we just arent there yet. THEN AGAIN...if we were to go out and grab Danille Hunter today I wouldnt be upset at all.
 

Card'em

All Star
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Posts
585
Reaction score
1,433
I am guessing we will disagree on how competitive the Cardinals actually were last year.

I'll go with the old Parcell's NFL adage, "you are what your record says you are". The Cards were a 4 win team last year with Kyler only playing 8 games. I just don't think it is realistic to say that the Cards will have trouble winning 5 games next year.

I'm guessing that the Cards will make that huge jump into middling status next season, and hopefully progress to a solid playoff team in 2025. Yep, it's a 3 year rebuild.
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
8,383
Reaction score
9,871
Location
Home of the Thunder
I gave a B because you don't build teams through FA, you build through the draft.

For me these are the kind of solid roster additions that are more important to sign. There were some absolute NUTS deals by desperate teams yesterday.

We have a lot of draft capital and these were solid vets for them to work with.

And nobody can complain they are short term deals.

Agree!

To me, the signings are exactly how a team should approach FA. 5 - 8 million a year guys.

What to do with the extra cap space? Use it to resign your home grown superstars! That's when you write a big check!

I guess Big Play Trey is next on that list for us!
 

TigToad

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 17, 2003
Posts
1,788
Reaction score
418
Location
Bally’s Sports needs to go away
Cardinals are not, at least not yet, a desirable free agent destination. Better to slightly over pay than miss out completely like last year. Monti learned from last year IMO.
I think last year was just clearing the books of the last regime’s decisions. This seems like Monti’s first go around. If these decisions give guys who make us better I am in.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,048
Location
Colorado
I'll go with the old Parcell's NFL adage, "you are what your record says you are". The Cards were a 4 win team last year with Kyler only playing 8 games. I just don't think it is realistic to say that the Cards will have trouble winning 5 games next year.

I'm guessing that the Cards will make that huge jump into middling status next season, and hopefully progress to a solid playoff team in 2025. Yep, it's a 3 year rebuild.
We can play this out. The Cardinals will be worse without DJ Humphries. The Cardinals best WR is Michael Wilson. The Cardinals are very dependent on James Conner and have no viable backup. The Cardinals still have zero pass rush. Their best CB is a bottom level NFL starter. Kyler Murray hasn't played more than 14 games in the past three seasons.

Some of these things may still change. But in terms of what happened yesterday, nothing really moves the needle.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,048
Location
Colorado
Signing a pile of defensive guys is what we needed. Our defense was so thin and so bad, yet still was better than expected. I want to see what we can do with a bit of talent and depth. Sold B.
The Cardinals were 31st in points allowed and 25th in yards allowed. How much worse did you expect them to be?
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,873
Reaction score
42,048
Location
Colorado
The issue with Hunter is going to be the years. That is why Minnesota didn't re-sign him. I am probably not giving Hunter 4 or 5 years which is what I feel he will get.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
556,344
Posts
5,435,157
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top