- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 10,077
- Reaction score
- 0
I believe that clause was niched by the NFL. They didn't allow it because it violated the collective barginning agreement.
Which clause...the no trade or the franchise tag?
I believe that clause was niched by the NFL. They didn't allow it because it violated the collective barginning agreement.
If we show an effort to improve this offseason and make Fitz the highest paid WR in football he will stay.
If not, then it is a crap shoot.
If the Cardinals cannot reach a contract extention this season, then they will do what they did with Karlos Dansby. Slap the franchise tag on him two years in a row. No gloom doom here.
If Larry wants to stay then why not re-sign him now. This team has a boat load of money to spend right now. What are we about 30 million under the cap. Yea show him the money!
If Larry wants to stay then why not re-sign him now. This team has a boat load of money to spend right now. What are we about 30 million under the cap. Yea show him the money!
I read that they plan to do it this coming off-season.
So what might it take to move from 4 or 5 to #1 in the upcoming draft, assuming Luck comes out? The Eli trade:
"Giants selected North Carolina State quarterback Philip Rivers with the fourth pick in the draft. The two teams then engineered a trade, with the Giants sending Rivers, their third-round pick in this draft (No. 65 overall), and first and fifth-round picks in the 2005 draft to the Chargers for Manning."