Cardinals/Maxx Crosby

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,985
Reaction score
42,080
Location
UK
Next to zero chance.

Firstly, I highly doubt the Raiders move him. You don't join a team as the new GM and instantly move your best player and fan favorite. That's like Keim starting in 2012 and trading Larry. The only caveat is if Maxx demands a trade.

Second, Crosby is easily a two 1sts and more player. A reasonable trade for Crosby would be a 1st, 2nd and 4th plus a future 1st. He's arguably the best defensive player in the league and he's only 27 years old.

I just don't see Monti going there.

The only way I see any trade is if there is a QB the Raiders really want, Maxx demands a trade, and they end up part of the same deal. For example, I could see a JJ McCarthy trade if Vikings want to stick with Darnold.

The Vikings wanting to trade Maxx for Kyler is up there with that dream I had about Gal Gadot.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,121
Reaction score
42,804
Location
Colorado
I am sure the Cardinals would be interested if he was available. I agree that they will likely inquire on Crosby once the Raiders, you know, have a HC and GM. I doubt moving Crosby will be a high priority unless the Raiders really want to reset (and I don't think they will) or have ammo to trade up for a QB (again...skeptical of this).

The timing is the funniest thing for me. Trying to cite sources about a trade when the team with the player doesn't have any of it's decision makers in pace is ridiculous.
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,002
Reaction score
234
Next to zero chance.

Firstly, I highly doubt the Raiders move him. You don't join a team as the new GM and instantly move your best player and fan favorite. That's like Keim starting in 2012 and trading Larry. The only caveat is if Maxx demands a trade.

Second, Crosby is easily a two 1sts and more player. A reasonable trade for Crosby would be a 1st, 2nd and 4th plus a future 1st. He's arguably the best defensive player in the league and he's only 27 years old.

I just don't see Monti going there.

The only way I see any trade is if there is a QB the Raiders really want, Maxx demands a trade, and they end up part of the same deal. For example, I could see a JJ McCarthy trade if Vikings want to stick with Darnold.

The Vikings wanting to trade Maxx for Kyler is up there with that dream I had about Gal Gadot.
I wouldn’t even trade two ones for Micah parsons….i would for a one this year and 2 next but we can bet our 401k that Monti will want to save that 2026 first for a quarterback….as far as Crosby goes…..meh he will be 28 a second is all I am offering
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,328
Reaction score
5,519
Location
Nashville TN.
Not a thing the Cardinals ever do. Would probably be a bad idea anyway considering the cost.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,121
Reaction score
42,804
Location
Colorado
I wouldn’t even trade two ones for Micah parsons….i would for a one this year and 2 next but we can bet our 401k that Monti will want to save that 2026 first for a quarterback….as far as Crosby goes…..meh he will be 28 a second is all I am offering
Outside of drafting a QB, there is no reason you shouldn't trade two 1sts for Parsons.
 

602 Native

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
2,528
Reaction score
4,925
Location
Gilbert
Probably the only way the Raiders trade Crosby is if it gets them a QB.
Thats why they want a first for Crosby to be able to trade up.

I think if we gave them our pick and maybe a 3rd the Raiders would do it.

The real question is do the Raiders think Sanders is a franchise QB?
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,416
Reaction score
36,095
Location
BirdGangThing
Next to zero chance.

Firstly, I highly doubt the Raiders move him. You don't join a team as the new GM and instantly move your best player and fan favorite. That's like Keim starting in 2012 and trading Larry. The only caveat is if Maxx demands a trade.

Second, Crosby is easily a two 1sts and more player. A reasonable trade for Crosby would be a 1st, 2nd and 4th plus a future 1st. He's arguably the best defensive player in the league and he's only 27 years old.

I just don't see Monti going there.

The only way I see any trade is if there is a QB the Raiders really want, Maxx demands a trade, and they end up part of the same deal. For example, I could see a JJ McCarthy trade if Vikings want to stick with Darnold.

The Vikings wanting to trade Maxx for Kyler is up there with that dream I had about Gal Gadot.
Negative Nancy.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,797
Reaction score
40,743
Location
Las Vegas
Thats why they want a first for Crosby to be able to trade up.

I think if we gave them our pick and maybe a 3rd the Raiders would do it.

The real question is do the Raiders think Sanders is a franchise QB?
If any team would it’s them
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,847
Reaction score
18,919
Location
The Giant Toaster
Outside of drafting a QB, there is no reason you shouldn't trade two 1sts for Parsons.
I know restructuring will occur but Dallas has 5 players on the books for $160m next year NOT including Parsons. I wonder if a team could pull a heist on Jerry since he’s already starting to lose it.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,680
Reaction score
17,043
Location
Modesto, California
I think much of the speculation stems from Maxx trying to bully the team into keeping Peirce as Head Coach last year...remember, he said he would demand a trade if Peirce was not retained.
IMO...Mark should have traded him for a bag of stale chips and a runny milkshake before he finished his sentence...but they didnt, they kept Peirce...and now he is gone....But I would bet Maxx has backed off from his trade demand
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,718
Reaction score
27,925
Location
Orlando, FL
I asked about this some time ago. I was told by a mediocre source that for some reason Brady was inclined to move him.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,522
Reaction score
16,771
Location
San Antonio, Texas
I know restructuring will occur but Dallas has 5 players on the books for $160m next year NOT including Parsons. I wonder if a team could pull a heist on Jerry since he’s already starting to lose it.
DeMarcus Lawrence is probably the more likely one that Dallas is willing to part ways with to gain cap space. Older and injury history but still can provide a pass rush IF he is healthy
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,797
Reaction score
40,743
Location
Las Vegas
DeMarcus Lawrence is probably the more likely one that Dallas is willing to part ways with to gain cap space. Older and injury history but still can provide a pass rush IF he is healthy
Umm the guy hasent been a dominant pass rusher for years and that’s with Parsons getting all the attention. Not to mention old as dirt! Noooo!
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,680
Reaction score
17,043
Location
Modesto, California
Can we interest you in a slightly used Kyler Murray, Mr. Davis? He still has tread on the tires :)
With Positional value and this draft being heavy on pass rush but light on QB...we would get Maxx and a 1st at least...even if it's a 2026 1st
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
16,249
Reaction score
17,217
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Truth is MO is not going to trade high multiple picks with his philosophy of sustainability.
But I don’t believe Crosby is happy with where the Raiders are and might want out.
I’d certainly give them this years 1st and something in 2026 but not our 1st. Let’s say a 3rd.
Raiders could take that and move up to get their qb.
 
Top