kerouac9
Klowned by Keim
They don’t do DVOA for individual defensive players.okay...so whats the DVOA for murph and hamilton?
Their defensive secondary analysis looks like this (from last year):
You must be registered for see images attach
They don’t do DVOA for individual defensive players.okay...so whats the DVOA for murph and hamilton?
So by that Hamiltons success rate was 8% higher than murphys? Am i reading it correctly?They don’t do DVOA for individual defensive players.
Their defensive secondary analysis looks like this (from last year):
You must be registered for see images attach
So by that Hamiltons success rate was 8% higher than murphys? Am i reading it correctly?
Be it on 1/3rd the snaps
Success rate (Suc%): The percentage plays of targeting this player on which the offense did not have a successful play. This means not only incomplete passes and interceptions, but also short completions which do not meet our baselines for success (45% of needed yards on first down, 60% on second down, 100% on third or fourth down). Defensive pass inter- ference is counted as a failure for the defensive player similar to a completion of equal yardage (and a new first down).
Sometimes raw data like this is so much better. Thanks for posting.They don’t do DVOA for individual defensive players.
Their defensive secondary analysis looks like this (from last year):
You must be registered for see images attach
I see.It’s not snaps, it’s targets.
It’s pretty noisy at that small a sample size, but you do you.I see.
But based on that definition Hamilton, when on the field, was more successful as a corner.
Even though he was technically targeted more often
They don’t do DVOA for individual defensive players.
Their defensive secondary analysis looks like this (from last year):
You must be registered for see images attach