Mitch
Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
#254...the third to last pick.
#254...the third to last pick.
The Cardinals' Picks:
1-31
2-63
3-95
4-131
5-167
6-204
7-204
7-254
These are your winning numbers! GO CARDS!
Geez, I don't think NE EVER signs FA's. They are loaded once again in the draft.http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/03/23/2009-compensatory-draft-picks/
Looks like NE, Tennesee, and Cinci gained some flexibility on draft day with all those extra picks in the mid rounds.
I've added the pick to my mock:#254...the third to last pick.
Comp picks are rigged. Apparently all-pro guard Alen Faneca carries as much weight as the Pat's former nickle Randall Gay, seeing how both resulted in 5th round comp picks. And did the Giants even lose anything to deserve a 3rd? The only good player I can think of is Shockey but he was traded.
How many more starts does Faneca have to make then, the guy started all 16 and made it to the probowl. I'm still wondering what the explanation is on this one.
All i can think about is that the acquired Mew Moore started 4 games, and the lost Haggans started 0, which doesn't make them equal in value, and a little value has be taken off of Faneca to compensate. Which makes me wonder when does a 'start' count? When a player starts or when he plays the majority of the snaps, and could a team cheat a little, starting their second stringer to give him the start, but playing the acquired first stringer from then on?
As the NFL explains, compensatory picks are awarded to teams that lose more or better compensatory free agents than they acquire. The number of picks a team can receive equals the net loss of compensatory free agents, up to a maximum of four. Compensatory free agents are determined by a secret formula based on salary, playing time and postseason honors. Not every free agent lost or signed is covered by the formula.
I had 26 correct (with almost all of them in the correct order), plus three more off by one round (all of which I said were possible). Two of the ones I missed, I had listed as possibilities if certain players qualified (they did). The Steelers' pick is the only one I really didn't anticipate at all. I can't explain it, but hopefully the Pittsburgh media gets an answer to that question. Faneca played 99 percent of the snaps, made the Pro Bowl and got a huge contract ($7.8 million per season, plus a little more that doesn't count in the equation). I even went back and looked for funny money in his contract and couldn't find any.
And no, being a guard doesn't have anything to do with it.
http://forums.kffl.com/showthread.php?t=247418&page=8
One of them should be #240.Two 204's... Ooops!
Gay started 13 games, Faneca started 16 games = same compensation. The number of starts is THE only measuring stick! Pro-Bowl, stats, quality of play is irrelevant!