Two year contract. Maybe this is what Graves meant when he said they will be doing things we don't like.
Originally posted by arthurracoon
WHY?!?!?!?!
I WANT BILLY G!!!
Originally posted by vince56
That settles it. I'm getting a team jersey with the # 1 on it and the name "WIDE RIGHT"
Originally posted by jstadvl
% of FGs made? How many of his kick offs are inside the five or in the end zone? I like Guillermo, however, before anyone rants about this being a bad move, the guy has done a pretty decent job no?
Originally posted by arthurracoon
WHY?!?!?!?!
I WANT BILLY G!!!
Originally posted by Shane H
Why would you want a kicker who has a bad percentage and cant kick tochbacks?
Originally posted by arthurracoon
Because he is clutch in the clutch.
Originally posted by arthurracoon
Because he is clutch in the clutch.
Originally posted by Stout
Hmm...like those FGs he missed last season against Dallas that would have given us the victory in regulation instead of going to overtime? Clutch? No.
Originally posted by arthurracoon
Just like Rackers missed some FG's vs the 49ers.
Originally posted by O
Two year contract. Maybe this is what Graves meant when he said they will be doing things we don't like.
Originally posted by Northern Card
So - Bill G... has some competition, and Rackers won't be signing with someone else prior to camp. Seems fairly astute to me. And. as said - if he doesn't work out he gets cut before the season opener at no real cost against the cap....
Originally posted by Red Dawn
Odd move by the Cards. Rackers career FG% is 66%, which would rank him in the bottom 5 of current kickers. Their plan must be to use him for kickoffs, or maybe Billy G. is done.
Originally posted by spanky
Talk about a succient summary..........some people always try and read more into things than exist. Hear ya got a new PM..........any good?