other teams have had them and made them work.
What it really boils down to is the attitudes involved...those meetings can get brutal as they call each other out on their weaknesses.......the best we can hope for is an honest commitment from the players to put in more work learning their responsibilities in their respective schemes.
a guy that runs a 4.5 cannot commit to running a 4.38....but a guy that does not know his assignments inside out can commit to spending a few extra hours each week studying his role on the team and studying film of opponents.
It has to start with accountability, they have to put aside the ego and be honest with their teammates.
'Hi, my name is Kevin Kolb, and I have been making bad decisions that have cost us as a team"
"Hi, my name is Adrian Wilson, and I have been a liability to our pass defense all season long"
"Hi, my name is Patrick Peterson, and right now I am just ****ing lost out on that field"
they cannot expect their teammates to respond well to their feedback unless they are honest about their own shortcomings.
Guess we wait and see what happens.