I'm fine with this. His advanced stats were essentially the same as Chase Edmonds'. Running backs are ENTIRELY fungible, which is why spending money on James Conner seems so silly. We probably will/would have gotten the same production from Williams.
That said, it's hilarious that Brit and others are praising this signing when it may block both Eno Benjamin and Ingram from getting more snaps. If it's good for Zaven Collins, why isn't it good for Benjamin/Ingram?
I feel like you intentionally disengage your brain sometimes for the sake manufacturing an argument.
Firstly, where did I "praise" this signing beyond saying he's a solid depth piece?
Eno Benjamin is a 7th round pick who has played 95 snaps in 2 years. Keaontay Ingram is a 6th round pick who hasn't done anything. Both are long shot disposable picks that you don't want to be relying on to be RB2 going into camp and it's wise to have a proven vet. I even said in the last 2 days that at vet min WIlliams isn't a lock to make the 53 if Eno, Ward or Ingram show up in camp. But you don;t want to go into camp without a plan B if they don't.
Zaven Collins was the #16 overall pick losing snaps to a guys who's days were numbered.
I don't think that really needs explaining to someone of your experience. Sometimes you just like to act dumb to try make a point.