BillsCarnage
ASFN Addict
That doesn't make any sense at all. If you beat a team, you can't lose a tie-breaker with them. You can't, that's just plain garbage! First tiebreaker should always, ALWAYS be head-to-head games. So we would, in this scenario, tie head-to-head with San Fran. We beat Carolina. Carolina beat San Fran. We go in as the five-seed and Carolina as the six-seed. Very, very simple.
What's this crap about we have to break a tie with San Fran and not Carolina? I'm not saying it isn't true, but logically speaking it makes zero sense. Why would the NFL make a boneheaded, nonsensical rule like this?
Ok everyone, this is how it works with a 3-way tie in this instance.
5th seed is up for grabs first.
- Cards are eliminated because SF has a better divisional record. Divisional foes need to be eliminated first; this is where the Cards are out of luck.
- SF is eliminated due to head-to-head with CAR
- CAR gets 5th seed
6th seed is up now.
- Cards are eliminated due to divisional record.
- SF gets 6th seed.
Swap out the Saints if you want it works out exactly the same.
So, the only way for the Cards to make the POs at this point is to have a better record than two of those 3 teams.
Last edited: