He will be a late 2nd, 3rd rounder, IMO. I'd absolutely take a flier. He's got the fire in the gut. He doesn't take the bus.I like him. I don’t know if he’s an nfl back. But I’d spend a pick on him.
He will be a late 2nd, 3rd rounder, IMO. I'd absolutely take a flier. He's got the fire in the gut. He doesn't take the bus.I like him. I don’t know if he’s an nfl back. But I’d spend a pick on him.
He will be a late 2nd, 3rd rounder, IMO. I'd absolutely take a flier. He's got the fire in the gut. He doesn't take the bus.
I’d trade down and take him later 3rd.He will be a late 2nd, 3rd rounder, IMO. I'd absolutely take a flier. He's got the fire in the gut. He doesn't take the bus.
4 of the top 10 receiving leaders this season were rookies. That is absolutely bonkers. It also blows a huge hole in the theory about recievers needing a year to acclimate to the NFL.
However, in Marvin's defense, those top 4 guys were #1 options in their offenses by the end of the year, while Marvin clearly was not. Taking everything into consideration, his stats really weren't that bad. They just weren't nearly as good as the top players in what looks like the best rookie receiving class in a long time. Potentially ever if they keep it up.
4 of the top 10 receiving leaders this season were rookies. That is absolutely bonkers. It also blows a huge hole in the theory about recievers needing a year to acclimate to the NFL.
However, in Marvin's defense, those top 4 guys were #1 options in their offenses by the end of the year, while Marvin clearly was not. Taking everything into consideration, his stats really weren't that bad. They just weren't nearly as good as the top players in what looks like the best rookie receiving class in a long time. Potentially ever if they keep it up.
Was it Bruce Arians? I know he had very little patience when it came to rookies. LOLThere was an absolute moron today saying rookies can't be expected to contribute. A DUCKING moron
A good distinction. The drafts haven't been "bad," with low bust rates, but they have been grossly disappointing. Same major holes year after year.People need to recognize the difference between bad and disappointing.
They were worse because it was Fitz vs Boldini have neither the skillz nor time to go look it up, but:
I am 100% certain there is a thead deep in the archives here on Fitz that probably sounds much the same as this one
1st world problemsThey were worse because it was Fitz vs Boldin
I think we're mostly just frustrated that Marvin isn't Larry. Larry's first career catch was a beautiful high point. We're used to guys like Larry or Hopkins who catch everything around them while Marv's game is more finesse. Marv is a bigger, slower, Hollywood brown.i have neither the skillz nor time to go look it up, but:
I am 100% certain there is a thead deep in the archives here on Fitz that probably sounds much the same as this one