Christopher Nolan Says Digital Is All About Money, Not Quality

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,148
Reaction score
25,043
Location
Killjoy Central
Christopher Nolan Says Digital Is All About Money, Not Quality

http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=735114&affid=100055

The rush to digital and the degrading of the movie-theater experience is devaluing the work of filmmakers, director Christopher Nolan told the audience at the Producers Guild of America's Produced By Conference on Saturday.

"I want to work with the best possible image quality, and that's film," Nolan insisted. "Film has the most range, the highest resolution by far. But you won't hear that, because there's no money in sticking with the old format.

"There's a huge danger to this, and it's being motivated by economic pressure."

In the hour-long session with his producer Emma Thomas, Nolan – who also famously refuses to shoot in 3D – said that he is so old-school he insists on printing and showing dailies at the end of every day's shoot. He also refuses to use digital intermediates, a step that is almost mandatory for special effects work, because he says they degrade the image quality.

"We're seeing an incredibly rapid and precipitous shift based purely on the economics of production," said Nolan of the push to digital filmmaking. "We're being forced to buy [digital] cameras like they're iPads or iPhones, but that's not what's best for the audience."

The filmgoing experience, he added, is also being hurt by the poor quality of projection in many theaters, and by pre-show advertisements.

"I went to a theater last weekend, and they were showing ads for TV shows on the screen," he said. "They really are treating it like you're sitting there in your living room. We're reducing it to 2K [digital] projectors that show ads for TV shows, and that runs the risk of devaluing what we do as filmmakers."
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,165
Reaction score
70,358
i love Christopher Nolan. No digi, no 3d ********. Just epic filmmaking and i expect nothing less from TDKR.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
If I were Hollywood I would worry less about the quality of the images, and more on the qualities of their stories.

JMHO.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,367
Reaction score
11,463
If I were Hollywood I would worry less about the quality of the images, and more on the qualities of their stories.

JMHO.

I agree, but its not like this is Michael Bay or some hack who relies entirely on effects. Nolan's stories are superb, and in the genre of action/adventure he blows the vast majority of his peers away.
 

Stronso

Schweddy Balls
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
2,738
Reaction score
5
Location
TUCSON
Chris Nolan is a fantastic director who doesn't get caught up in the BS
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,366
Reaction score
32,018
Location
Scottsdale, Az
If I were Hollywood I would worry less about the quality of the images, and more on the qualities of their stories.

JMHO.

When a director like Ridley Scott is selling out to pretty but empty movies, I know Hollywood is in trouble.

I fear for Blade Runner 2.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
He has a point in regards to epic spectacles, but for those of us that can't afford to make movies for millions of dollars, digital is a godsend. I like Nolan, but this just makes him sound like an elitist member of the 1%.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
Now we need Terry Gilliam to jump in with his, "You can't make a good movie without shooting 2 miles of film." Or something like that.

I think one of the worst jobs in the world just might be Terry Gilliam's editor.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
He has a point in regards to epic spectacles, but for those of us that can't afford to make movies for millions of dollars, digital is a godsend. I like Nolan, but this just makes him sound like an elitist member of the 1%.

This is basically the same argument for music. Because of digital recording I am now able to hear bands that never would have been signed by a big record label and some of the music is incredible.

Young artists be it musical, cinematic or otherwise are no longer at the mercy of big money interests and are able to create pure art for arts sake without the old commercial interests poisoning the pot.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
This is basically the same argument for music. Because of digital recording I am now able to hear bands that never would have been signed by a big record label and some of the music is incredible.

Young artists be it musical, cinematic or otherwise are no longer at the mercy of big money interests and are able to create pure art for arts sake without the old commercial interests poisoning the pot.

Well, I know of no en masse group of musicians or producers upset over digital recording. The issue there is much more about compression, and that started back in the tape days. It's called the Loudness Wars, and the push to make everything louder has totally annihilated fidelity recording.

In terms of the general process, almost everyone embraces it, though it's nice to hear the occasional 2" tape recording -- which can be easily digitized.
 
Top